AMD Ryzen 7 9700F vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a complete sweep: the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F wins all 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons against the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445. The margins are not uniform, however, and the spread reveals distinct performance characteristics that go beyond simple core-count arithmetic.

The largest single gap appears in the find prime numbers test, where the 9700F scores 183 against 56 for the AI 7 445, a delta of 226.8%. This workload is highly sensitive to integer throughput per thread, and the 9700F's higher boost clock and larger L3 cache likely explain the outsized advantage. Data encryption shows a 104.3% delta (21488 vs 10519), while extended instructions lands at 112.9% (33688 vs 15826). These are compute-heavy, latency-sensitive operations where clock speed and cache depth matter more than raw core count.

The multithread benchmark tells a slightly different story. The 9700F scores 36470 against 18115, a 101.3% delta. That is almost exactly double, which aligns with the 8-core versus 6-core configuration combined with the 16-thread versus 12-thread spread. The physics test shows a 117.4% delta (2122 vs 976), again favoring the desktop part by a margin larger than the core ratio would suggest.

Floating point math shows a 98% delta (77955 vs 39362), integer math 107.1% (120788 vs 58332), and random string sorting 95.4% (45890 vs 23488). These hover near the doubling threshold, indicating that the 9700F's advantage scales with both its additional cores and its per-core efficiency. Data compression at 95.5% (421988 vs 215812) is the closest margin relative to the overall pattern, yet still represents a near-total doubling of throughput.

The single-thread tests are the most moderate. Both the passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread records show 4691 for the 9700F against 3591 for the AI 7 445, a 30.6% delta. This is the smallest advantage in the entire comparison, but it is still substantial. A 30.6% lead in single-core performance is consistent with the 5.50 GHz boost clock of the 9700F versus the 4.60 GHz boost of the AI 7 445, though the architecture differences discussed below also play a role.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the Zen 5 architecture and a 4 nm process node from TSMC, but they diverge sharply in nearly every other structural detail. The 9700F belongs to the 9000 series with the Granite Ridge codename, while the AI 7 445 uses the Gorgon Point codename in the Ryzen AI 400 generation. The 9700F is a desktop part on AMD Socket AM5; the AI 7 445 is a mobile part on AMD Socket FP8.

Core and thread counts differ: 8 cores and 16 threads for the 9700F versus 6 cores and 12 threads for the AI 7 445. The generation field reveals a key distinction: the AI 7 445 is listed as "Zen 5 / Zen 5c", indicating a hybrid core arrangement, whereas the 9700F uses homogeneous Zen 5 cores. This mixed-core design likely explains why the AI 7 445's multithread scores do not scale proportionally with its thread count relative to the 9700F.

Cache architecture differs significantly. Both use 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, but the L3 cache is dramatically different: 32 MB shared for the 9700F versus only 4 MB for the AI 7 445. This 8x difference in L3 capacity is one of the most consequential gaps in the comparison. The 9700F also has a larger die at 70.6 mm² with 8,315 million transistors, while the AI 7 445 has no recorded die size or transistor count, suggesting a smaller physical footprint for mobile integration.

Clock speeds favor the desktop part heavily. The 9700F runs at 3.80 GHz base and 5.50 GHz boost, while the AI 7 445 runs at 2.00 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost. The base clock gap of 1.80 GHz is enormous and explains why the 9700F maintains large leads even in lightly threaded workloads. Thermal design power also reflects the segment difference: 65 watts for the 9700F versus 28 watts for the AI 7 445.

Platform support diverges as well. The 9700F uses PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), while the AI 7 445 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes. Memory support overlaps on DDR5 dual-channel with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, but the AI 7 445 adds LPDDR5X support, which is typical for mobile designs. Both support ECC memory. The 9700F has no integrated graphics; the AI 7 445 includes Radeon 840M graphics. The 9700F has an unlocked multiplier; the AI 7 445 does not.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 4691 in the passmark single-thread test, compared to 3591 for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, a 30.6% delta.

Q: How does the multithread performance compare?

A: The 9700F scores 36470 in passmark multithread, while the AI 7 445 scores 18115, a 101.3% delta. The 9700F delivers roughly double the multithread throughput.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache size?

A: The 9700F has 32 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AI 7 445 has only 4 MB. This is an 8x difference in L3 capacity.

Q: Do both processors use the same architecture?

A: Both use Zen 5, but the AI 7 445 is listed as "Zen 5 / Zen 5c", indicating a mix of full and compact cores, while the 9700F uses homogeneous Zen 5 cores.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds?

A: The 9700F boosts to 5.50 GHz, while the AI 7 445 boosts to 4.60 GHz. The base clocks are 3.80 GHz and 2.00 GHz, respectively.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The AI 7 445 includes Radeon 840M graphics. The 9700F has no integrated graphics (N/A).

The Verdict

The data points to a clear performance hierarchy: the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is the stronger processor in every measured workload. Its 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs versus the 79th percentile of the AI 7 445 confirms the gap in absolute terms. The 9700F's average benchmark score of 69996 dwarfs the AI 7 445's 26936, a difference that places them in entirely different performance classes.

The nearest rival data reinforces this. The 9700F sits within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69875), 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70163), 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69515), and 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700K (69355). These are all high-end desktop or mobile HX parts. The AI 7 445, by contrast, trades within 0.1% of the Intel Core i7-1370P (26900), 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7545U (26849), 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G (27051), and 0.6% behind the Intel Core i9-9900K (27097). The AI 7 445 competes with mid-range mobile and older desktop parts, not with the 9700F's peer group.

The 9700F is the choice for anyone prioritizing raw compute throughput, particularly in multi-threaded workloads, math-heavy tasks, or data processing. The AI 7 445 is the choice for mobile integration, where its 28-watt TDP, LPDDR5X support, and integrated Radeon 840M graphics provide platform capabilities the 9700F cannot offer. The 9700F requires a discrete GPU; the AI 7 445 does not.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 9700F | AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.50 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 28 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | AMD Socket FP8 |

| Codename | Granite Ridge | Gorgon Point |

| Generation | Ryzen 7 (Zen 5 (Granite Ridge)) | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |

| Transistors | 8,315 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 70.6 mm² | Not recorded |

| L3 Cache | 32 MB (shared) | 4 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 24 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | N/A | Radeon 840M |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Launch MSRP | $289 | Not recorded |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

The 9700F also carries a release date of 2025-09-15, while the AI 7 445 lists 2026-01-04. Both are marked as Active in production status. The part numbers differ: 100-000001902 for the 9700F and 100-000001935 for the AI 7 445.

Where Each One Wins

The 9700F wins in every recorded benchmark category. It leads by the smallest margin in single-thread workloads (30.6%), which still represents a meaningful advantage for responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. It leads by the largest margin in find prime numbers (226.8%), a workload that rewards high clock speeds and deep caches. Data encryption (104.3%), extended instructions (112.9%), and physics (117.4%) all show leads exceeding 100%, indicating that the 9700F's advantages compound in compute-intensive scenarios. The multithread, floating point, integer, random string sorting, and data compression tests all show deltas between 95% and 107%, making the 9700F roughly twice as fast in aggregate threaded workloads.

The AI 7 445 does not win a single benchmark in the head-to-head data. Its strengths are contextual rather than direct. It operates at 28 watts TDP versus 65 watts, which is critical for mobile battery life and thermal budgets. It includes integrated Radeon 840M graphics, enabling a complete system without a discrete GPU. It supports LPDDR5X memory, which is standard for compact laptops. It uses PCIe Gen 4 rather than Gen 5, but 14 lanes are sufficient for typical mobile peripherals. Its smaller cache and lower clocks are consistent with its power envelope.

For desktop users with a discrete GPU, the 9700F delivers superior performance in all measured dimensions. For mobile users prioritizing power efficiency, integrated graphics, and platform flexibility, the AI 7 445 provides a viable alternative. The data does not support any scenario where the AI 7 445 outperforms the 9700F in raw compute, but the mobile part's platform features are not captured in these CPU benchmarks. The choice ultimately depends on the use case: sustained high-throughput computing versus compact, low-power integration.