AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and Intel Core 5 213PTE?

A: Both processors feature 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX boosts to 5.10 GHz.

Q: What is the difference in their average benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX has an average benchmark score of 60,104, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 32,924. This places the AMD part in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, versus the 83rd percentile for the Intel part.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX does not.

Q: What are the market segments for these two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX is a mobile processor, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE is a desktop processor.

Q: How do their memory bandwidth figures compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX has a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, whereas the Intel Core 5 213PTE has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split based on workload type. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX delivers a decisive overall performance advantage, winning 9 out of 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons. Its average benchmark score of 60,104 is nearly double that of the Intel Core 5 213PTE's 32,924. The AMD processor also sits at the 92nd percentile, while the Intel chip is at the 83rd percentile.

For users focused on data compression, encryption, extended instruction sets, integer math, multithreaded performance, random string sorting, and single-thread tasks, the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX is the clear choice based on the recorded data. Its wins in multithreaded performance (23.2% ahead) and data encryption (51.5% ahead) are substantial.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins only two benchmarks: floating-point math and physics. In those tests, it leads by 13.6% and 23.6%, respectively. This suggests that for workloads heavily reliant on floating-point calculations or physics simulations, the Intel part has a definitive advantage.

The choice between the two depends on the primary use case. For general-purpose computing, data handling, and multithreaded applications, the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX is the stronger performer. For specialized floating-point or physics-based tasks, the Intel Core 5 213PTE holds the edge. The Intel chip also offers ECC memory support and a lower 45 W TDP, which may be relevant for specific system requirements.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results show a dominant performance profile for the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX. In PassMark data compression, the AMD chip scores 363,759 versus 261,083 for the Intel part, a 39.3% advantage. Data encryption shows an even larger gap: 21,840 for AMD against 14,413 for Intel, a 51.5% lead. Extended instructions also favor AMD heavily, with a score of 27,638 compared to Intel's 16,146, a 71.2% difference.

In integer math, the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX scores 100,328, which is 7.8% ahead of the Intel Core 5 213PTE's 93,109. The multithreaded test shows AMD at 31,517 versus Intel's 25,590, a 23.2% win. Random string sorting sees AMD at 44,494 and Intel at 30,106, a 47.8% margin. Single-thread performance is closer: AMD scores 3,879 against Intel's 3,718, a 4.3% lead. The find prime numbers test is nearly identical, with AMD at 159 and Intel at 157, a 1.3% edge.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE's wins are in floating-point math and physics. In floating-point math, Intel scores 71,722 against AMD's 61,972, a 13.6% advantage. In the physics test, Intel scores 2,199 versus AMD's 1,681, a 23.6% lead. These two wins indicate specific strengths in computational areas that rely on floating-point operations.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and Intel Core 5 213PTE differ in several key specifications. The AMD chip has a base clock of 3.60 GHz, while the Intel chip has a base clock of 2.10 GHz. The boost clocks are closer: 5.10 GHz for AMD and 5.20 GHz for Intel. The TDP differs, with AMD rated at 55 W and Intel at 45 W.

The sockets are incompatible: AMD uses AMD Socket FL1, while Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor is unlocked, meaning the multiplier can be adjusted, whereas the Intel chip is locked. The integrated graphics differ as well: AMD includes Radeon 610M, while Intel includes UHD Graphics 730.

The memory support varies. AMD supports DDR5 only, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, but AMD has a higher memory bandwidth at 83.2 GB/s versus Intel's 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory is supported only on the Intel chip. PCIe lanes also differ: AMD offers Gen 5 with 28 lanes (CPU only), while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX is built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Dragon Range codename, part of the 8000 series. It uses a 5 nm process node from TSMC and contains 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. Its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

Cache configurations differ between the two. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with a shared 32 MB L3 cache. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, with a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The AMD processor also has a higher total cache capacity in the L3 segment.

The market segments diverge: the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX is a mobile processor, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE is a desktop processor. The release dates also differ, with the AMD chip released on 2025-04-22 and the Intel chip on 2026-03-08. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221; the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX is the clear winner in data-heavy and multithreaded workloads. Its 39.3% lead in data compression and 51.5% lead in data encryption make it suitable for file archiving, database operations, and security-related tasks. The 71.2% advantage in extended instructions indicates strong performance in specialized instruction sets, which benefits applications that leverage AVX or similar extensions. The 23.2% multithreaded advantage supports rendering, video encoding, and other parallel workloads.

The AMD chip also wins in integer math by 7.8%, random string sorting by 47.8%, and single-thread performance by 4.3%. These results suggest broad competence across general productivity tasks, sorting algorithms, and single-threaded applications. Its 92nd percentile ranking places it among the top processors in the database.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins specifically in floating-point math and physics. The 13.6% lead in floating-point math is significant for scientific computing, simulations, and 3D rendering that rely on floating-point operations. The 23.6% lead in the physics test indicates strength in physics simulation workloads, which are common in game engines and engineering software.

The Intel chip also offers ECC memory support, which is a critical feature for reliability-sensitive environments such as servers or workstations where data integrity is paramount. Its lower 45 W TDP may make it easier to cool in constrained desktop systems. The dual memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility in system configuration. The Intel part achieves these wins while being a desktop processor, whereas the AMD chip is designed for mobile platforms, which may influence system-level design choices.