AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX vs Intel Core 5 211E Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and Intel Core 5 211E represent two distinct approaches to processor design, one a mobile-focused part and the other a desktop-oriented chip. The benchmark data shows a clear split in performance characteristics, with the AMD part dominating multi-threaded workloads while the Intel chip takes single-threaded and floating-point tasks. The head-to-head comparison reveals 8 wins for the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and 3 wins for the Intel Core 5 211E across the recorded PassMark tests.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most significant single-workload victory for the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX comes in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where it scores 159 against Intel's 43, a delta of 269.8 percent. This is an extreme outlier in the dataset and indicates a massive advantage in this specific integer-heavy calculation. The physics test shows the next largest gap, with the AMD part scoring 1681 versus 702, a 139.5 percent lead. Both results point to the AMD architecture handling these particular instruction patterns far more efficiently.

The PassMark multithread score is another key differentiator. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX records 31517, which is 32.2 percent ahead of the Intel Core 5 211E's 23833. This aligns with the overall average benchmark score trend: the AMD part sits at 60104 while the Intel chip averages 37829. The extended instructions test shows a 28 percent lead for AMD (27638 versus 21592), and random string sorting favors AMD by 29.7 percent (44494 versus 34308). Data encryption also goes to AMD with a 21.8 percent margin (21840 versus 17938). Integer math favors AMD at 100328 versus 88117, a 13.9 percent gap. Data compression is closer, with AMD ahead by 4.9 percent (363759 versus 346757).

The Intel Core 5 211E wins the floating point math test, scoring 66402 against AMD's 61972, a 6.7 percent advantage. It also takes the single-thread benchmark with a score of 4006 versus 3879, a 3.2 percent margin. These two wins show that the Intel design retains an edge in specific scalar and floating-point execution, even while trailing in most other categories.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different foundries and process nodes. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX uses a 5 nm process from TSMC with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The Intel Core 5 211E uses a 10 nm process from Intel with a much larger 257 mm² die. This die size difference is substantial and reflects the different transistor densities achievable at these nodes, though transistor counts are not recorded for the Intel part.

Core configurations differ significantly. The AMD chip has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel chip has 10 cores and 16 threads. Despite having fewer physical cores, the AMD part delivers higher multi-threaded scores, indicating the Zen 4 architecture extracts more performance per core. The cache hierarchy also differs: the AMD part uses 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. The Intel part uses 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and only 20 MB shared L3. The larger shared L3 on the AMD side likely contributes to its advantage in data compression and random string sorting.

Clock speeds favor the AMD part. It has a 3.60 GHz base clock and a 5.10 GHz boost clock, compared to the Intel chip's 2.70 GHz base and 4.90 GHz boost. The power envelope differs as well, with the AMD part rated at 55 W TDP and the Intel part at 65 W TDP. The AMD chip also features an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel chip is locked. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FL1 and the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700, making them incompatible with each other's platforms.

Memory support shows a split. The AMD part supports DDR5 only with dual-channel memory and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel chip supports ECC memory, while the AMD chip does not. PCIe lanes also differ: the AMD part has 28 Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part has 16 Gen 5 lanes. Integrated graphics differ, with the AMD part using Radeon 610M and the Intel part using UHD Graphics 730.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX wins in all multi-threaded and most integer-heavy workloads. The multithread score of 31517 versus 23833 makes it the clear choice for parallel processing tasks such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computation. The physics simulation score of 1681 versus 702 reinforces this, as physics engines often scale well with thread count. The find prime numbers result, with a 269.8 percent lead, suggests the AMD architecture handles this particular loop-heavy workload far better, which could translate to certain encryption or hashing tasks.

The data compression advantage of 4.9 percent, combined with the 29.7 percent lead in random string sorting, indicates the AMD part manages memory bandwidth and cache access more effectively for data manipulation tasks. The 32.2 percent multithread lead makes it the better option for any workload that can utilize 16 threads, which is a common scenario in content creation and compilation.

The Intel Core 5 211E wins in floating point math with a 6.7 percent margin. This could benefit workloads like scientific simulations, financial modeling, or any task that relies heavily on FPU throughput. The single-thread win of 3.2 percent gives it an edge in lightly-threaded applications such as legacy software, certain games, or productivity applications that do not scale beyond a few cores. The higher single-thread score of 4006 versus 3879 also suggests snappier response in everyday desktop use.

The Intel part also brings ECC memory support, which the AMD part lacks. This makes it suitable for stability-critical applications like file servers or workstation use where data integrity is paramount. The support for DDR4 memory also allows for lower-cost system builds using existing memory modules.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher overall benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX has an average benchmark score of 60104, while the Intel Core 5 211E averages 37829.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX has 8 cores. Both have 16 threads.

Q: Which chip has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 211E boosts to 4.90 GHz.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The AMD part supports DDR5 only. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX does not.

Q: Which processor ranks higher in the overall CPU percentile?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX is in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 211E is in the 86th percentile.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX for multi-threaded performance. It wins 8 out of 11 head-to-head benchmarks, including the multithread test by 32.2 percent and the physics test by 139.5 percent. Its average benchmark score of 60104 is roughly 59 percent higher than the Intel part's 37829. The 92nd percentile ranking versus the 86th percentile confirms its higher standing in the overall CPU hierarchy. Users running parallel workloads should select the AMD part based on these measurements.

The Intel Core 5 211E wins in single-thread and floating-point math. Its single-thread score of 4006 beats the AMD part's 3879, and its floating point score of 66402 beats 61972. It also offers ECC memory support and DDR4 compatibility, features absent from the AMD part. The Intel chip's 86th percentile ranking still places it among capable processors, but its lower multithread scores limit its appeal for heavily parallel tasks. The Intel part suits workloads that prioritize single-thread latency and floating-point throughput, plus users requiring ECC memory. For everything else, the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX is the stronger choice according to the recorded data.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX | Intel Core 5 211E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Base Clock | 3.60 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 55 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FL1 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 71 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 32 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | false | true |

| PCIe Lanes | Gen 5, 28 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Multiplier Unlocked | true | false |

| Launch MSRP | null | $221 |