AMD Ryzen 7 8700G vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Intel Core 5 213PTE are both 8-core, 16-thread desktop processors, yet benchmark results show them pulling in opposite directions across different workloads. The AMD part wins 9 of the 15 head-to-head comparisons, while the Intel chip takes 6, with the margins often being substantial. The data reveals a clear split: the Ryzen 7 8700G dominates data processing, encryption, and multi-threaded throughput, while the Core 5 213PTE excels in raw single-core speed and specific compute tasks like prime number calculation and physics simulation.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G establishes its strongest territory in memory and data-heavy operations. Its wins include passmark data compression (386811 vs 261083, a 48.2% advantage), passmark data encryption (22842 vs 14413, a 58.5% lead), and passmark random string sorting (46025 vs 30106, a 52.9% margin). The extended instructions test is the largest single win for AMD, at 80% ahead (29067 vs 16146). These are workloads that stress cache bandwidth and instruction-level parallelism, where the Ryzen’s Zen 4 architecture appears particularly efficient. The AMD chip also wins passmark multithread (31690 vs 25590, up 23.8%) and passmark integer math (103107 vs 93109, up 10.7%), indicating strong general-purpose multi-core scaling.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE takes the opposite side of the ledger. Its most decisive wins come in single-core oriented tests: cinebench r23 singlecore is 40.8% higher (3070 vs 1817), and cinebench r15 singlecore is 7.4% higher (309 vs 286). The Intel part also wins cinebench r23 multicore by 21.3% (21751 vs 17128), which is notable because it contradicts the AMD win in cinebench r15 multicore (2693 vs 2192, up 22.9% for AMD). The other Intel victories are passmark find prime numbers (157 vs 103, up 34.4%), passmark physics (2199 vs 1647, up 25.1%), and passmark floating point math (71722 vs 63815, up 11%). This pattern suggests the Intel chip has a higher peak clock advantage that pays off in latency-sensitive or branch-heavy workloads, while the AMD chip excels where memory bandwidth and cache throughput matter more.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G uses the Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 178 mm² and 25,000 million transistors. It is part of the 8000 series, codenamed Phoenix, and uses the AMD Socket AM5. The Intel Core 5 213PTE is codenamed Bartlett Lake, built on a 10 nm Intel process, and uses the Intel Socket 1700. The process node difference alone explains a significant portion of the efficiency and clock behavior: AMD’s smaller node allows for a lower base clock of 4.20 GHz but a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while Intel’s larger node runs a lower base of 2.10 GHz but a higher boost of 5.20 GHz.

Cache configurations differ markedly. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L3 on the Intel side (24 MB vs 16 MB) likely contributes to its strong single-core results, while the AMD chip’s smaller but faster cache hierarchy seems to favor the repetitive data operations in the compression and encryption tests. Memory support also diverges: the Ryzen 7 8700G supports only DDR5 with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while the Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but with a lower bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The AMD part does not support ECC memory, while the Intel part does. PCIe lanes also differ: AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are a major differentiator: the Ryzen 7 8700G features the Radeon 780M, while the Intel part has the UHD Graphics 730. The Ryzen also has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the Intel multiplier is locked.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single margin in the entire comparison is the passmark extended instructions test, where the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G scores 29067 against the Intel Core 5 213PTE’s 16146, an 80% advantage. This is a synthetic workload that heavily exercises SIMD and specialized instruction sets, and the Zen 4 architecture’s execution units clearly handle it far more efficiently. The next biggest win for AMD is passmark data encryption at 58.5% (22842 vs 14413), followed by random string sorting at 52.9% (46025 vs 30106) and data compression at 48.2% (386811 vs 261083). These three tests all involve moving large amounts of data through memory, and the Ryzen’s higher memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s appears to be a decisive factor.

For the Intel part, the standout win is cinebench r23 singlecore, where it scores 3070 against AMD’s 1817, a 40.8% gap. This is a massive single-threaded margin that reflects the Intel chip’s higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz versus 5.10 GHz, but the difference is far larger than the clock gap suggests, indicating a more efficient single-core pipeline in the Bartlett Lake design. The Intel chip also wins cinebench r23 multicore by 21.3% (21751 vs 17128), which is surprising given that AMD wins cinebench r15 multicore by 22.9% (2693 vs 2192). The discrepancy between the two Cinebench versions suggests that the r23 workload scales better with the Intel’s cache layout or clock behavior under sustained multi-core load, while the r15 version favors AMD. The Intel part also wins passmark find prime numbers by 34.4% (157 vs 103) and passmark physics by 25.1% (2199 vs 1647), both of which are integer-heavy, latency-bound tasks.

The passmark single-thread test is a narrow win for AMD, at 3928 vs 3718, a 5.6% margin. This is interesting because the Intel part wins the Cinebench single-core tests by much larger margins, suggesting that the two benchmarks measure different aspects of single-thread performance. The passmark multithread test also goes to AMD by 23.8% (31690 vs 25590), reinforcing the theme that AMD’s advantage lies in sustained multi-threaded throughput across diverse workloads, while Intel’s advantage is more concentrated in specific single-threaded and floating-point scenarios.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G boosts to 5.10 GHz.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G support ECC memory?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 8700G does not support ECC memory. The Intel Core 5 213PTE does support ECC.

Q: Which chip wins the most head-to-head benchmark comparisons?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G wins 9 of the 15 head-to-head tests, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE wins 6.

Q: What is the biggest single benchmark margin between the two?

A: The passmark extended instructions test, where the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G scores 29067 versus the Intel Core 5 213PTE’s 16146, an 80% advantage for AMD.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has 16 MB.

Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is built on a 4 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE is built on a 10 nm process by Intel.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear use-case split. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is the better choice for workloads that involve heavy data manipulation, encryption, compression, and random sorting. Its 48.2% lead in data compression, 58.5% lead in data encryption, and 52.9% lead in string sorting make it the superior processor for database operations, file archiving, and any task that moves large volumes of data through memory. The 80% advantage in extended instructions also suggests it is better suited for scientific or media-processing applications that leverage SIMD instructions. Additionally, the Radeon 780M integrated graphics are far more capable than the UHD Graphics 730, making the Ryzen 7 8700G the obvious pick for a system without a discrete GPU.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE is the better choice for single-threaded performance and specific compute tasks. Its 40.8% lead in cinebench r23 singlecore is the largest single-threaded margin in the comparison, and the 21.3% win in cinebench r23 multicore shows it can scale well in certain multi-threaded rendering workloads. The wins in physics (25.1%) and prime number finding (34.4%) indicate strength in simulation and mathematical workloads. However, the Intel part loses the passmark single-thread test by 5.6%, so its single-thread advantage is not universal across all benchmarks. For users who prioritize raw clock speed in lightly-threaded applications and can benefit from 24 MB of L3 cache, the Intel part is the data-backed choice. For everyone else, the AMD chip’s broader multi-threaded wins and integrated graphics make it the more versatile processor according to the benchmark results.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 8700G | Intel Core 5 213PTE |

|---|---|---|

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Cores | 8 | 8 |

| Threads | 16 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 4.20 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Phoenix | Bartlett Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Transistors | 25,000 million | N/A |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | N/A |

| Release Date | 2024-01-07 | 2026-03-08 |

| Launch MSRP | $329 | $221 |