AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX and Intel Core 5 213PTE are both 8-core, 16-thread processors, yet they deliver sharply contrasting performance profiles based on benchmark data. The data shows the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX wins 9 of 15 head-to-head tests, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE wins 6, but the Intel part takes decisive wins in modern multi-core and single-core workloads. The Ryzen 7 7745HX leverages a 5 nm process with a higher base clock, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE counters with a higher boost clock and newer release date, making the choice dependent on specific workload priorities.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX has an average benchmark score of 33091, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 32924. The difference is minimal, with the AMD part holding a 0.5% edge.

Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins decisively, scoring 21751 compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX’s 18452.5. This represents a 15.2% advantage for Intel in this heavily multi-threaded rendering test.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which is slightly higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX’s 5.10 GHz boost clock.

Q: What is the difference in process node technology?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD part’s smaller process node is a key architectural difference.

Q: Which processor has a higher single-thread score in PassMark?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX wins the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 3947, compared to the Intel Core 5 213PTE’s 3718. This gives AMD a 6.2% advantage in this specific test.

Q: What are the memory support differences between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX supports DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX and Intel Core 5 213PTE is substantial. The AMD part is built on Zen 4 architecture from the Dragon Range codename, using a 5 nm process at TSMC with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. In contrast, the Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename on a 10 nm process at Intel, with no transistor or die size data available. This process node difference is significant—the smaller 5 nm node typically enables higher efficiency and density, which is reflected in the AMD part’s higher base clock of 3.60 GHz versus the Intel part’s 2.10 GHz.

Cache configurations also diverge. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 213PTE has larger per-core caches: 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, but a smaller 24 MB of shared L3. This means Intel dedicates more cache closer to each core, while AMD provides a larger shared pool.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD part supports only DDR5 with a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but its bandwidth is capped at 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity is another divergence: the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX offers Gen 5 with 28 lanes (CPU only), whereas the Intel Core 5 213PTE offers Gen 5 with only 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ, with AMD using Radeon 610M and Intel using UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part is unlocked for overclocking, while the Intel part is locked. Market segments also differ: AMD targets mobile, while Intel targets desktop.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split based on workload priorities. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX is the stronger choice for data-intensive and encryption-heavy tasks. It wins PassMark data compression by 46.8%, data encryption by 59.3%, and extended instructions by 79.4%. It also dominates in integer math (13.6% ahead), multithread (27.3% ahead), and random string sorting (47.7% ahead). For users processing large datasets, compressing files, or running encryption workloads, the AMD part is the evident winner.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE, however, takes the crown in modern rendering and single-core-heavy applications. It wins Cinebench R23 multi-core by 15.2% and single-core by 39.7%, which is a massive margin. It also leads in floating-point math by 10.4% and physics by 22.8%. For 3D rendering, scientific simulations, or any workload that relies heavily on floating-point calculations or high single-thread performance, the Intel part is superior. The Intel part also has a higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which likely contributes to its single-thread dominance.

Given that both processors share the same 83rd percentile vs all CPUs, they are globally comparable in overall performance. The decision hinges on whether the user needs AMD’s raw integer and data-crunching throughput or Intel’s floating-point and single-thread efficiency. Mobile users should note the AMD part is designed for laptops, while the Intel part is a desktop chip.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX has a base clock of 3.60 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has a base clock of 2.10 GHz. Conversely, the Intel part has a higher boost clock at 5.20 GHz versus AMD’s 5.10 GHz. Thermal design power (TDP) also differs: the AMD part has a TDP of 55, while the Intel part has a TDP of 45.

The process node is a major difference, with AMD using 5 nm at TSMC and Intel using 10 nm at Intel. The AMD part has a transistor count of 6,570 million and a die size of 71 mm², while these figures are not available for the Intel part. Cache per core differs: AMD uses 64 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 per core, while Intel uses 80 KB L1 and 2 MB L2 per core. Shared L3 cache is 32 MB on AMD and 24 MB on Intel.

Memory support differs, with AMD supporting only DDR5 and Intel supporting both DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is higher on AMD at 83.2 GB/s versus Intel’s 76.8 GB/s. PCIe lanes differ, with AMD offering 28 lanes versus Intel’s 16 lanes, both Gen 5. The integrated graphics are Radeon 610M on AMD and UHD Graphics 730 on Intel. The AMD part is multiplier unlocked, while the Intel part is not. The socket differs: AMD uses AMD Socket FL1, while Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The release date also differs, with AMD launching in 2023-01-03 and Intel in 2026-03-08. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results reveal a clear pattern of workload-specific dominance. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX wins 9 of 15 tests, with its largest victories coming in PassMark extended instructions (79.4% ahead, 28966 vs 16146) and data encryption (59.3% ahead, 22967 vs 14413). These are massive deltas that indicate a strong architectural advantage for AMD in specialized instruction sets and cryptographic workloads.

AMD also wins PassMark data compression by 46.8% (383322 vs 261083) and random string sorting by 47.7% (44474 vs 30106). In integer math, AMD leads by 13.6% (105773 vs 93109). The AMD part also wins PassMark multithread by 27.3% (32581 vs 25590) and PassMark single-thread by 6.2% (3947 vs 3718). In Cinebench R15 multi-core, AMD wins by 36.2% (2986 vs 2192), which is a substantial margin in an older benchmark.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins 6 tests, but its victories are concentrated in the most modern and demanding benchmarks. The most striking win is Cinebench R23 single-core, where Intel leads by 39.7% (3070 vs 1850). This is a decisive single-thread advantage. Intel also wins Cinebench R23 multi-core by 15.2% (21751 vs 18452.5), which is notable because it flips the multi-core narrative from the older R15 test. Intel also wins PassMark floating-point math by 10.4% (71722 vs 64297) and PassMark physics by 22.8% (2199 vs 1697). The Intel part wins Cinebench R15 single-core by 4.7% (309 vs 294.5) and PassMark find prime numbers by a razor-thin 0.6% (157 vs 156).

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX is the clear winner in data handling and security-related workloads. Its victories in data compression, encryption, and extended instructions make it ideal for file archiving, database operations, and cryptographic tasks. The 46.8%, 59.3%, and 79.4% margins in these tests are the largest of any benchmark comparison, indicating a fundamental advantage in these areas. AMD also wins in integer math and random string sorting, making it well-suited for general-purpose computing that involves heavy integer calculations, such as code compilation or financial modeling. The PassMark multithread win of 27.3% further reinforces its strength in heavily threaded integer workloads.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE is the winner in rendering, physics simulation, and single-threaded applications. The 39.7% single-core lead in Cinebench R23 is the most significant single-thread delta in the comparison, making Intel the better choice for applications that depend on one or two fast cores, such as many legacy games or lightly threaded productivity tools. The 15.2% win in Cinebench R23 multi-core shows that Intel’s newer architecture scales better in modern renderers. The 22.8% win in PassMark physics suggests superiority in game physics calculations. The 10.4% lead in floating-point math makes the Intel part preferable for scientific computing, 3D modeling, and any workload that relies on floating-point precision.

In summary, the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX wins where data is processed, compressed, or encrypted, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE wins where floating-point math and single-thread speed are paramount. The AMD part is for mobile users who need raw integer throughput, while the Intel part is for desktop users who prioritize render performance and single-thread responsiveness.