AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS vs Intel Core i5-11600 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results paint a clear picture of two very different processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS dominates the majority of the shared benchmark suite, winning 13 of the 15 recorded comparisons. The Intel Core i5-11600 manages only two wins, but they are significant ones.

The AMD chip's biggest victories come in heavily threaded workloads. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Ryzen 7 7735HS scores 2153.4 against the Intel's 1538, a 28.6% advantage. PassMark integer math shows a similar story: 85309 for the AMD versus 60158 for Intel, a 29.5% gap. Data encryption is even more lopsided, with the Ryzen scoring 18237 against 11060, a 39.4% edge. The AMD processor also leads by 25.6% in data compression (293278 versus 218062) and by 25.9% in floating-point math (47865 versus 35478). Multithread performance follows the trend, with the Ryzen 7 7735HS scoring 23166 versus 17918, a 22.7% advantage.

The Intel Core i5-11600 fights back hard in the Cinebench R23 tests. In multi-core, Intel scores 15269 against AMD's 13106, a 16.5% win. The single-core R23 result is even more striking: 2155 versus 1546, giving Intel a 39.4% lead. That is the largest single-benchmark margin in either direction across the entire comparison.

The remaining results are closer. Cinebench R15 single-core sees the AMD chip ahead by 12.5% (248 versus 217). PassMark single-thread scores are nearly identical: 3296 for AMD versus 3284 for Intel, a razor-thin 0.4% difference. The AMD processor also wins the other workload tests: extended instructions by 21.7% (20050 versus 15698), physics by 17% (1073 versus 891), random string sorting by 17.1% (30388 versus 25178), and find prime numbers by 5.1% (59 versus 56).

The average benchmark score puts the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS slightly ahead at 25147 versus 24563 for the Intel. Both processors sit at the 77th percentile among all CPUs in the database, meaning they land in the same overall performance tier despite their very different workload strengths.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i5-11600 wins decisively. It scores 2155 in R23 single-core against the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS's 1546, a 39.4% advantage.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS beat the Intel chip in multi-threaded workloads?

A: Mostly yes, but not in every test. The AMD wins Cinebench R15 multi-core by 28.6% and PassMark multithread by 22.7%, but the Intel wins Cinebench R23 multi-core by 16.5%.

Q: How close are these two CPUs in overall average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS averages 25147, while the Intel Core i5-11600 averages 24563. That is a difference of roughly 2.4% in the AMD's favor.

Q: What is the TDP difference between these processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-11600 has a TDP of 65 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS is rated at 35 watts.

Q: Do both processors support DDR4 memory?

A: No. The Intel Core i5-11600 supports DDR4 memory, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS supports DDR5.

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-11600 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-11600 is the choice for workloads that depend on high-frequency, single-thread execution. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2155 is a standout result, 39.4% ahead of the AMD part. If the primary use case is lightly threaded applications, older games, or tasks that rely on strong per-core performance, the Intel chip has a measurable edge. The R23 multi-core win of 16.5% also suggests that some modern multi-threaded rendering workloads favor Intel's design, likely due to clock speed behavior.

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS is the more balanced performer across a wider range of tasks. It wins in 13 out of 15 head-to-head tests, including all PassMark workloads. For data compression, encryption, integer math, floating-point math, physics simulation, and extended instruction sets, the AMD processor delivers 17% to 39.4% higher scores. That makes it the stronger option for content creation, scientific computing, data processing, and any workload that scales well with the 8 cores and 16 threads. The Ryzen also holds a slight edge in single-thread PassMark performance, 3296 versus 3284, so there is no meaningful penalty in basic desktop responsiveness.

Users who need a laptop processor with strong all-around throughput should favor the AMD chip. Users building a desktop where single-core speed is the priority, especially for certain gaming or legacy application scenarios, should look at the Intel part. The AMD wins the majority, but the Intel wins the tests that matter most for specific use cases.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every fundamental specification. The Intel Core i5-11600 is a desktop part with 6 cores and 12 threads, a base clock of 2.80 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS is a mobile processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, a base clock of 3.20 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.75 GHz.

Thermal design power differs substantially: Intel is rated at 65 watts, AMD at 35 watts. The Intel chip uses the Intel Socket 1200, while the AMD uses the AMD Socket FP7. Memory support diverges completely, with Intel supporting DDR4 and AMD supporting DDR5. The AMD processor also has a dual-channel memory bus with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel has a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory support is present on the AMD chip but not on the Intel.

The Intel processor carries a launch MSRP of $213. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP in the database. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i5-11600 is built on Rocket Lake architecture using Intel's 14 nm process with a die size of 276 mm². The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS uses Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process with a die size of 210 mm². The smaller process node and die size allow the AMD chip to achieve higher performance at a significantly lower TDP.

Cache configurations also differ. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L3 pool on the AMD processor helps in multi-threaded and data-heavy workloads.

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS includes integrated Radeon 680M graphics, while the Intel Core i5-11600 has no integrated graphics listed in the database. The AMD part also supports ECC memory and DDR5, reflecting its newer design. PCIe support is identical: both offer Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip is marked end-of-life, while the AMD chip is listed as active production. Release dates are roughly two years apart, with Intel launching in March 2021 and AMD in March 2023.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS is the better all-around processor based on the recorded data. It wins 13 of 15 head-to-head benchmarks, holds a higher average benchmark score (25147 versus 24563), does so at a 35-watt TDP, and includes integrated graphics and ECC support. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with 16 MB of shared L3 cache and DDR5 memory support makes it the stronger choice for multi-threaded productivity, data work, and modern mobile computing.

The Intel Core i5-11600 is not without merit. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score is 39.4% higher, and it wins R23 multi-core by 16.5%. For desktop builders who prioritize single-thread performance and do not need integrated graphics, the Intel part remains competitive. The 65-watt TDP is higher, but desktop platforms typically have more cooling headroom. Its 6-core, 12-thread design with 12 MB of L3 cache is sufficient for many mainstream tasks.

Choose the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS for laptops, mobile workstations, or any system where efficiency and multi-threaded throughput matter most. Choose the Intel Core i5-11600 for a desktop build where single-core response and R23 multi-core rendering performance are the priority. The data does not support calling one a clear overall winner; it supports matching the processor to the workload.