AMD Ryzen 7 7700 vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS Comparison

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 outperforms the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS in every single head-to-head test recorded. Out of 15 comparisons, the Ryzen 7 7700 claims 15 wins, leaving the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS with zero. This is a decisive victory for the desktop chip, though the context of their different market segments—desktop versus mobile—explains the performance gap. The Ryzen 7 7700 is the faster processor, but the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is designed for a different purpose.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest performance disparity emerges in specialized instruction workloads. In the PassMark extended instructions test, the Ryzen 7 7700 scores 96,902 against a mere 22,298 for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, a staggering 334.6% advantage. This suggests the desktop chip handles complex, AVX-heavy or cryptographic-style workloads with far greater efficiency. Similarly, the PassMark random string sorting test shows a 168.5% delta, with the Ryzen 7 7700 posting 101,836 versus 37,922. The prime number finding test also heavily favors the desktop part, with a score of 197 against 84, a 134.5% difference.

Multi-core rendering benchmarks continue the trend, though with smaller margins. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen 7 7700 achieves 18,760 points, which is 26.9% ahead of the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS’s 14,784. The older Cinebench R15 multi-core test shows a 24% lead for the Ryzen 7 7700 (3,047 vs. 2,458). PassMark multithread results reinforce this, with the Ryzen 7 7700 scoring 34,470, a 29.4% improvement over the 26,646 of the mobile chip.

Single-threaded performance also favors the Ryzen 7 7700, albeit by smaller margins. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the desktop chip scores 1,930, which is 11.9% higher than the 1,724 of the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. The Cinebench R15 single-core test shows a 13.4% lead (308 vs. 271.5). PassMark single-thread results show a 10% delta, with scores of 4,063 for the Ryzen 7 7700 and 3,692 for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.

Other workloads show consistent, if less dramatic, wins. PassMark data compression gives the Ryzen 7 7700 a 30.2% edge (405,084 vs. 311,199), and data encryption shows a 26.6% lead (23,858 vs. 18,838). Integer math scores are 110,295 for the Ryzen 7 7700, an 18.2% advantage over 93,342. Floating-point math follows a similar pattern, with the desktop chip scoring 66,246 against 55,739, an 18.9% lead. The PassMark physics test shows a substantial 46.4% gap, with scores of 1,978 and 1,351 respectively.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 7 7700 wins in every benchmark category present in the data. This includes multi-threaded productivity, single-threaded responsiveness, and specialized instruction processing. For users running CPU-intensive applications like video rendering, 3D modeling, or heavy data analysis, the Ryzen 7 7700 offers a clear performance advantage across the board. Its largest wins are in workloads that leverage extended instructions or require high memory bandwidth, where it demonstrates a 334.6% and 168.5% lead respectively.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS does not win any benchmark, but its profile suggests a different strength: efficiency. With a TDP of 28 watts compared to the Ryzen 7 7700’s 65 watts, the mobile chip is designed for laptops where power consumption and heat dissipation are critical. It offers 8 cores and 16 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 7700, but operates at lower clock speeds, with a base of 3.30 GHz and a boost of 5.10 GHz. The data indicates that the Ryzen 7 7700 is the superior choice for performance, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is positioned for portable systems where the performance deficit is a trade-off for lower power draw.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on the Zen 4 architecture, but they are distinct implementations. The Ryzen 7 7700 uses the Raphael codename and is fabricated on a 5 nm process node at TSMC, with a die size of 71 mm² and 6,570 million transistors. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses the Hawk Point codename and is fabricated on a more advanced 4 nm process node, also at TSMC, but with a larger die size of 178 mm² and a significantly higher transistor count of 25,000 million. The smaller process node and larger transistor count for the mobile chip likely contribute to its efficiency, though the desktop chip’s smaller die and lower complexity may aid in raw clock speed.

Cache configurations differ notably. Both chips have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core. However, the Ryzen 7 7700 has 32 MB of shared L3 cache, double the 16 MB found on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. This larger L3 cache on the desktop part is a significant factor in its superior multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, as it allows more data to be stored closer to the cores.

Memory support is similar, with both chips supporting DDR5 and dual-channel memory. The Ryzen 7 7700 has a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS offers a slightly higher 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. The platforms diverge on PCIe: the Ryzen 7 7700 provides Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), whereas the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The desktop chip’s newer PCIe standard and more lanes offer greater expansion potential.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Ryzen 7 7700 includes Radeon Graphics, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS features the Radeon 780M, which is a more capable integrated solution for mobile use. The Ryzen 7 7700 is an unlocked multiplier processor, allowing for overclocking, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is locked. The desktop chip uses an AMD Socket AM5, while the mobile chip uses an AMD Socket FP7. The Ryzen 7 7700 was released on 2023-01-13 with a launch MSRP of $329, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS was released on 2024-04-15.

The Verdict

From the data, the verdict is clear for performance-focused users: the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is the superior processor. It wins in every tested benchmark, with particularly decisive leads in extended instructions (334.6%), random string sorting (168.5%), and prime number finding (134.5%). Its higher base and boost clocks (3.80 GHz and 5.30 GHz vs. 3.30 GHz and 5.10 GHz), larger L3 cache (32 MB vs. 16 MB), and higher TDP (65W vs. 28W) all contribute to its dominance. The Ryzen 7 7700 is the pick for a desktop workstation where maximum compute throughput is the priority.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is not without merit, but its strengths lie elsewhere. With a TDP of just 28 watts, it is engineered for mobile platforms where battery life and thermal management are paramount. Its 4 nm process node and higher transistor count (25,000 million vs. 6,570 million) suggest a more integrated design, including a more powerful Radeon 780M integrated GPU. For a laptop user who needs solid 8-core/16-thread performance without the power draw of a desktop chip, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the appropriate choice. The data shows a performance gap, but it is a gap that comes with the benefit of portability and efficiency. Therefore, the choice depends on the use case: raw performance dictates the Ryzen 7 7700; mobile efficiency dictates the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-threaded performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is faster in single-threaded tests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 1,930 compared to the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS’s 1,724, an 11.9% lead.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS win any benchmark against the Ryzen 7 7700?

A: No. The head-to-head data shows 15 benchmarks where the Ryzen 7 7700 wins and 0 where the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS wins.

Q: What is the largest performance difference between the two chips?

A: The largest difference is in the PassMark extended instructions test, where the Ryzen 7 7700 scores 96,902 versus 22,298 for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, a 334.6% delta.

Q: How do the memory bandwidths compare?

A: The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Ryzen 7 7700 has 83.2 GB/s. Both support DDR5 memory.

Q: Are both processors based on the same architecture?

A: Yes, both are based on Zen 4 architecture. However, the Ryzen 7 7700 uses the Raphael codename on a 5 nm process, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses the Hawk Point codename on a 4 nm process.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 7700 unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7700 has an unlocked multiplier. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS does not, as its multiplier is locked.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 7700 | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Series | 7000 series | 8000 series |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.30 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 28 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | AMD Socket FP7 |

| Codename | Raphael | Hawk Point |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |

| Transistors | 6,570 million | 25,000 million |

| Die Size | 71 mm² | 178 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 32 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 24 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics | Radeon 780M |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2023-01-13 | 2024-04-15 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |