AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and the Intel Core 3 201TE. The head-to-head table is empty, with zero recorded wins for either processor. However, the individual benchmark records for the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT provide a full picture of its measured performance, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has no recorded benchmark scores at all in the database.

For the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT, the recorded multi-threaded results show a substantial capability across several test suites. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the chip scores 23794 points, while in Cinebench R20 multi-core it scores 9993, and in Cinebench R15 multi-core it reaches 2398. The 3DMark suite shows 7683 points at 16 threads and 7680 at max threads, indicating that the processor scales effectively from 16 threads to the full thread count. The PassMark multithread score of 28053 reinforces this pattern, with integer math at 93942 and floating point math at 53808.

Single-threaded results for the AMD part are likewise recorded. Cinebench R23 single-core scores 3359, Cinebench R20 single-core scores 1410, and Cinebench R15 single-core reaches 338. The 3DMark single-thread test returns 959, while PassMark single-thread scores 3535. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1879 and 4-thread score of 3603 show moderate scaling from two to four threads, while the 8-thread score of 6141 indicates strong scaling as more cores are engaged.

The Intel Core 3 201TE has no benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its nearest rivals list is empty. The percentile rank of the Intel part is 50, meaning it sits at the midpoint of all CPUs in the database by the recorded metrics, whereas the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT holds a percentile rank of 81, placing it above the large majority of all recorded processors. The AMD chip's average benchmark score across all tests is 29879.

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT also has nearest rival entries in the database. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H posts an average score of 29868, a delta of 0 percent relative to the 5800XT. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS both score 29955, which is 0.3 percent above the 5800XT. The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29713, which is 0.6 percent below. These narrow deltas show that the 5800XT sits in a tightly contested performance band among these rivals, with differences of less than one percent in average benchmark score across the group.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear separation between these two processors, though the comparison is constrained by the absence of benchmark scores for the Intel Core 3 201TE. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT delivers measured multi-threaded performance that places it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 29879. The Intel Core 3 201TE, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile, which is the median position in the database.

The AMD processor uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel processor uses 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD part boosts to 4.80 GHz from a 3.80 GHz base, while the Intel part boosts to 4.60 GHz from a 2.90 GHz base. The AMD chip has a 105 watt TDP, while the Intel chip has a 45 watt TDP. The AMD part has a launch MSRP of $249, and the Intel part has a launch MSRP of $134.

For workloads that rely on multi-threaded throughput, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT clearly has the structural advantage in the database: twice the cores, twice the threads, and a higher boost clock. The recorded Cinebench and PassMark scores confirm that the AMD part delivers strong multi-threaded results. For systems where power draw is the primary constraint, the Intel Core 3 201TE uses less than half the TDP of the AMD part, though its performance characteristics are not recorded in the database.

The Intel processor includes integrated graphics in the form of UHD Graphics 730, while the AMD processor has no integrated graphics. This makes the Intel part viable for systems without a discrete GPU, a factor that appears directly in the specification records. The AMD part, lacking integrated graphics, requires a separate graphics card for any display output.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds of the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Intel Core 3 201TE has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE includes UHD Graphics 730. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A in the database.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT supports DDR4 memory. The Intel Core 3 201TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT has a TDP of 105 watts. The Intel Core 3 201TE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: What percentile rank does each processor hold in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT holds the 81st percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Core 3 201TE holds the 50th percentile.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT belongs to the 5000 series, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has no series designation recorded. The AMD part uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part uses 4 cores and 8 threads. The base clock of the AMD chip is 3.80 GHz versus 2.90 GHz for the Intel chip. The boost clock of the AMD chip is 4.80 GHz versus 4.60 GHz for the Intel chip. The TDP of the AMD chip is 105 watts versus 45 watts for the Intel chip.

The socket differs: the AMD part uses AMD Socket AM4, and the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The process node differs as well: the AMD part is fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The die size of the AMD chip is 74 mm², while the Intel chip has a die size of 163 mm². The AMD part has 4,150 million transistors recorded, while the Intel part has no transistor count in the database.

The cache hierarchy differs in structure. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support differs. The AMD chip supports DDR4 only, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, but the memory bandwidth differs: the AMD chip records 51.2 GB/s, and the Intel chip records 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe support differs. The AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

The AMD chip has no integrated graphics, while the Intel chip includes UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel part does not. The release dates differ: the AMD part was released on 2024-07-30, and the Intel part on 2025-01-12. The part numbers are 100-000001582 for the AMD chip and SRPKDQ5CK for the Intel chip.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT uses the Zen 3 architecture with the codename Vermeer. The generation is recorded as Ryzen 7 (Zen 3 (Vermeer)). The Intel Core 3 201TE has no architecture field recorded, but its codename is Bartlett Lake, and its generation is recorded as Core 3 (Bartlett Lake). The manufacturing process differs: the AMD part uses 7 nm technology from TSMC, and the Intel part uses 10 nm technology from Intel. The AMD chip is built on a 74 mm² die with 4,150 million transistors, while the Intel chip has a 163 mm² die with no transistor count listed.

The core and thread counts reflect different design approaches. The AMD part features 8 cores and 16 threads, indicating simultaneous multithreading support. The Intel part features 4 cores and 8 threads, also indicating multithreading support but at half the core count. The cache layout differs between the two designs: the AMD part uses a per-core L1 of 64 KB and per-core L2 of 512 KB, with a shared L3 of 32 MB. The Intel part uses a per-core L1 of 80 KB and per-core L2 of 1.25 MB, with a shared L3 of 12 MB. The Intel part has a larger per-core L2 cache, while the AMD part has a substantially larger shared L3 cache.

The memory architecture differences are notable. The AMD part supports DDR4 memory only, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory buses and both support ECC memory. The PCIe interface differs: the AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

The power envelope differs significantly. The AMD part has a TDP of 105 watts, while the Intel part has a TDP of 45 watts. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, indicating overclocking support, while the Intel part has a locked multiplier. The AMD part has no integrated graphics, while the Intel part includes UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part is a desktop segment processor, and the Intel part is also a desktop segment processor. Both are listed as active in production status.