AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS vs Intel Core i5-1350P Comparison

# AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS vs Intel Core i5-1350P

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS and Intel Core i5-1350P are two mobile processors that land in the same performance tier, with the AMD part holding a narrow but consistent lead across every Cinebench iteration in the data. The Ryzen 7 5800HS posts an average benchmark score of 4827, placing it just ahead of the Core i5-1350P’s 4776, a 1.1% difference that mirrors the head-to-head results. Both CPUs sit at the 59th percentile among all tested processors, meaning they occupy virtually the same position in the overall performance landscape. The real story here is not about dramatic gaps, but about how two very different architectures—Zen 3 on 7nm versus Raptor Lake on 10nm—arrive at nearly identical outcomes.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head Cinebench results paint a picture of near-total parity with a slight AMD edge. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Ryzen 7 5800HS scores 1682 against the Core i5-1350P’s 1664, a 1.1% win for AMD. The single-core R15 test shows a 237-to-234 margin, a 1.3% advantage for the Ryzen part. Moving to Cinebench R20, the pattern repeats: AMD leads 7009 to 6935 in multi-core (1.1% delta) and 989 to 979 in single-core (1% delta). The R23 results continue the trend, with AMD winning multi-core 16690 to 16514 (1.1%) and single-core 2356 to 2331 (1.1%).

None of these margins exceed 1.3%, so the practical difference in day-to-day use will be imperceptible in most workloads. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS wins all six head-to-head tests, but the largest victory is just 1.3%—a statistical tie in real-world terms. What matters more is that the Intel part, despite having four additional cores (12 versus 8), cannot translate that core count into a multi-core advantage. The Ryzen’s per-core efficiency and higher effective throughput per thread keep it ahead even in heavily threaded Cinebench workloads. The Core i5-1350P’s single-core scores are also slightly lower across the board, indicating that its higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz does not overcome the Ryzen’s architectural efficiency at 4.40 GHz.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS wins every benchmark category in the data, so the use-case split is less about raw performance and more about platform characteristics. The Ryzen part’s 8-core/16-thread configuration with Zen 3 architecture delivers consistent results across both single-threaded and multi-threaded tests, making it a strong choice for sustained workloads like video rendering or software compilation where the 35W TDP allows for stable operation. The Intel Core i5-1350P, with its 12 cores (likely a mix of performance and efficiency cores) and 16 threads, offers a different kind of flexibility—its lower 28W TDP suggests it can fit into thinner, more power-constrained chassis, though the benchmark data does not show a performance benefit from that efficiency.

For users prioritizing raw Cinebench scores, the Ryzen 7 5800HS is the clear winner, albeit by a razor-thin margin. For users who need PCIe Gen 4 support—which the Intel part provides with 20 lanes—the Core i5-1350P offers a platform advantage that the Ryzen’s Gen 3 PCIe cannot match. The Intel chip also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, whereas the Ryzen is limited to DDR4, giving the Intel platform more memory flexibility for future upgrades. Neither chip is unlocked for overclocking, so the decision rests on these non-benchmark features.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS uses Zen 3 architecture on a 7nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 180 mm² and 10,700 million transistors. It is built on the Cezanne codename and targets the mobile segment with a 35W TDP. The Intel Core i5-1350P uses Raptor Lake architecture on Intel’s 10nm process, with the Raptor Lake-P codename and a 28W TDP. Intel’s die size and transistor count are not listed in the data, so direct density comparisons are not possible.

Cache layouts differ significantly. The Ryzen 7 5800HS has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i5-1350P has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip’s larger per-core L2 (2 MB versus 512 KB) likely helps with certain access patterns, but the Ryzen’s larger L3 (16 MB versus 12 MB) provides more shared cache for the whole package. The Ryzen’s integrated graphics is Radeon Vega 8, while the Intel part uses Iris Xe Graphics 80EU—both are onboard solutions, but the data does not include graphics benchmarks.

Memory support diverges: the Ryzen 7 5800HS is dual-channel DDR4 only, with a listed memory bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s, while the Core i5-1350P supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, though no bandwidth figure is provided. PCIe connectivity also differs, with the Ryzen offering Gen 3 and the Intel part offering Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The Intel chip’s newer PCIe standard is a meaningful architectural advantage for users with Gen 4 NVMe drives or discrete GPUs.

Specification Differences

The most obvious specification difference is core count: the AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-1350P has 12 cores and 16 threads. The thread count is identical, but Intel’s higher core count does not yield higher benchmark scores. Base clocks differ dramatically—the Ryzen runs at 2.80 GHz, while the Intel part lists a base clock of 1900.00 MHz (1.90 GHz). The boost clocks are closer: 4.40 GHz for AMD versus 4.70 GHz for Intel. The TDP also differs, with the Ryzen rated at 35W and the Intel part at 28W.

Socket and platform details set them apart: the Ryzen 7 5800HS uses AMD Socket FP6, while the Core i5-1350P uses Intel BGA 1744. The process node is 7nm for AMD and 10nm for Intel. Memory support is DDR4-only for AMD versus DDR4/DDR5 for Intel. PCIe generation is Gen 3 for AMD versus Gen 4 with 20 lanes for Intel. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $320, while the AMD part has no listed launch MSRP. The Ryzen 7 5800HS was released on January 11, 2021, while the Core i5-1350P followed on January 3, 2023—a two-year gap that explains the Intel part’s newer platform features.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has better multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS scores 16690 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, beating the Intel Core i5-1350P’s 16514 by 1.1%. Despite having 12 cores to the Ryzen’s 8, the Intel chip cannot overcome the AMD part’s per-thread efficiency.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-1350P have a higher boost clock than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS?

A: Yes, the Intel part has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz versus 4.40 GHz for the AMD chip. However, this does not translate into higher single-core benchmarks—the Ryzen wins every single-core Cinebench test by about 1-1.3%.

Q: Which processor supports DDR5 memory?

A: Only the Intel Core i5-1350P supports DDR5, along with DDR4. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS is limited to DDR4 memory, with a listed memory bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS has a TDP of 35W, while the Intel Core i5-1350P has a TDP of 28W. This makes the Intel part potentially easier to cool in thin-and-light laptops.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, neither the Ryzen 7 5800HS nor the Core i5-1350P has an unlocked multiplier, so both are locked for overclocking.

Q: How do they compare in average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800HS has an average benchmark score of 4827, and the Core i5-1350P scores 4776. Both sit at the 59th percentile among all CPUs, indicating they belong to the same performance class.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear, if narrow, victory for the AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS across all six Cinebench tests, with margins ranging from 1% to 1.3%. If raw processing power is the sole criterion, the Ryzen 7 5800HS is the pick—it wins every benchmark and does so with a lower core count, which speaks to the efficiency of its Zen 3 architecture. The Intel Core i5-1350P, however, offers platform advantages that the benchmarks do not capture: PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 lanes, dual memory support (DDR4 and DDR5), and a lower 28W TDP that may enable thinner laptop designs. The Intel part also carries a launch MSRP of $320, while the AMD chip has no listed price.

For a builder prioritizing raw Cinebench performance, the Ryzen 7 5800HS is the safer choice, but the margins are so small that real-world applications will likely show no perceptible difference. For a builder who values modern connectivity—PCIe Gen 4 for fast SSDs or external GPUs—and memory flexibility, the Core i5-1350P is the more forward-looking option, despite its slightly lower scores. Both CPUs are locked, both are mobile parts, and both sit at the 59th percentile, so the decision ultimately hinges on platform features rather than benchmark bragging rights. The AMD part wins the performance comparison; the Intel part wins the platform comparison. Choose accordingly.