AMD Ryzen 7 5705G vs Intel Core 3 305 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G against the Intel Core 3 305. However, the Intel Core 3 305 has a full set of recorded benchmark scores, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has no benchmark entries at all in the database. This means a direct comparison of measured performance is impossible from the recorded data. The only comparative signals come from the Intel chip's percentile placement and its nearest rival deltas.

The Intel Core 3 305 sits at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 18,302. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i3-14100 scores 18,318 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core 5 330 scores 18,345 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core 7 360 scores 18,374 (0.4% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 2600E scores 18,230 (0.4% lower). These deltas are all under half a percent, indicating that the Core 3 305 delivers performance statistically indistinguishable from its immediate competitors in the database.

For the Core 3 305 specifically, the Cinebench results show a multicore score of 13,123 in R23 and a single-core score of 1,852 in the same test. In R20, the multicore score is 5,511 and the single-core score is 777. The R15 results are 1,322 multicore and 186 single-core. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 15,439, a single-thread score of 3,977, and specialized workloads including data compression at 146,857, data encryption at 11,019, floating point math at 42,284, integer math at 32,295, and prime number finding at 115.

The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has no recorded scores, so no win-loss tally exists between the two processors. The database shows zero wins for either side. Any statement about which processor outperforms the other must rely solely on the architectural and specification differences recorded, not on direct measurements.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed. The Intel Core 3 305, by contrast, has 17 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and PassMark tests.

Q: How does the Intel Core 3 305 compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Core 3 305 has an average benchmark score of 18,302. The Intel Core i3-14100 is 0.1% higher at 18,318, the Intel Core 5 330 is 0.2% higher at 18,345, the Intel Core 7 360 is 0.4% higher at 18,374, and the AMD Ryzen 5 2600E is 0.4% lower at 18,230. All four rivals are within 0.4% of the Core 3 305's score.

Q: What is the Core 3 305's best single-thread result?

A: The highest single-thread score recorded is 3,977 in the PassMark single-thread test. The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1,852, the R20 single-core score is 777, and the R15 single-core score is 186.

Q: What process node does each processor use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G uses a 7 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core 3 305 uses a 3 nm process from Intel.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G supports DDR4 with a dual-channel memory bus and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 3 305 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel memory bus and 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel Core 3 305 does not.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design points. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G is a Zen 3 part built on TSMC's 7 nm process, using the Cezanne codename. It is a desktop part on AMD Socket AM4 with 8 cores and 16 threads, base clock of 3.80 GHz, boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and a 65 W TDP. The transistor count is listed at 10,700 million on a 180 mm² die. Cache is organized per core: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The integrated graphics are Radeon Graphics with 512 shader processors.

The Intel Core 3 305 uses the Wildcat Lake codename, built on Intel's 3 nm process. It is a mobile part on Intel BGA 1516 with 6 cores and 6 threads, base clock of 1.50 GHz, boost clock of 4.30 GHz, and a 15 W TDP. Cache is structured differently: 192 KB of L1 total, 2.5 MB of L2 total, and 6 MB of shared L3. The integrated graphics are Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core. The database records no transistor count or die size for this part.

The memory architecture also diverges sharply. The AMD part uses DDR4 with dual-channel support and a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel part uses DDR5 and LPDDR5X with single-channel support and a higher memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. PCIe support differs as well: the AMD chip provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel chip provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes from the CPU.

The generation labels confirm the split: the AMD side is listed as Ryzen 7 (Zen 3, Cezanne), while the Intel side is Core 3 (Wildcat Lake). Neither processor supports ECC memory. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier; the Intel part is locked. The AMD part's part number is 100-000001800, while the Intel part's is SAE3L.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear split in use cases, but it does not support a head-to-head performance verdict because the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has no benchmark scores in the database. What the data does show is that the Intel Core 3 305 is a measured performer sitting at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18,302 and all nearest rivals within 0.4%. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has zero recorded measurements, so its percentile of 50 and average score of 0 reflect the absence of data, not actual performance.

For users who need a mobile processor with a low 15 W TDP, the Intel Core 3 305 is the only option between the two that fits a mobile socket and a low-power envelope. It also offers a newer 3 nm process, DDR5/LPDDR5X memory support, and a higher memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. Its 6 cores and 6 threads with a 4.30 GHz boost clock are recorded, and its benchmark scores are available across all major test suites.

For users who need a desktop processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, a 65 W TDP, and an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G is the only option between the two that fits those criteria. It uses the AM4 socket, supports DDR4 dual-channel memory, and has a higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its larger cache structure (16 MB L3, 512 KB L2 per core, 64 KB L1 per core) and higher core count are documented.

The data does not indicate which processor is faster. It indicates which processor is measured (Intel) and which is not (AMD). Any claim of superiority would be unsupported by the database.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 7 5705G | Intel Core 3 305 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 6 |

| Base clock | 3.80 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.60 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Process node | 7 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 cache | 64 KB per core | 192 KB |

| L2 cache | 512 KB per core | 2.5 MB |

| L3 cache | 16 MB | 6 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR4 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 lanes | Gen 4, 6 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon Graphics 512SP | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) |

| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release date | 2025-02-23 | 2026-04-15 |

| Mult multiplier unlocked | Yes | No |

| Transistors | 10,700 million | Not recorded |

| Die size | 180 mm² | Not recorded |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $309 |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 3 305 wins in every measurable benchmark category because it is the only one of the two with recorded scores. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13,123 and single-core score of 1,852, along with PassMark multithread score of 15,439 and single-thread score of 3,977, provide a full performance profile. Its 72nd percentile placement and average score of 18,302, within 0.4% of four nearest rivals, show it holds its own against comparable processors in the database. It also wins on process technology (3 nm vs. 7 nm), memory bandwidth (59.7 GB/s vs. 51.2 GB/s), and memory type support (DDR5 and LPDDR5X vs. DDR4). Its 15 W TDP makes it suitable for mobile systems, and its Gen 4 PCIe connectivity is newer than the AMD part's Gen 3.

The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G wins on core count and thread count (8 cores, 16 threads vs. 6 cores, 6 threads), which indicates a structural advantage for heavily parallel workloads, though no benchmark data confirms it. It also has a higher boost clock (4.60 GHz vs. 4.30 GHz), a larger L3 cache (16 MB vs. 6 MB), and a dual-channel memory bus compared to the Intel part's single-channel bus. The AMD part supports more PCIe lanes (16 vs. 6), has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, and uses the desktop AM4 socket. Its 65 W TDP is higher, reflecting a desktop design point rather than mobile efficiency. The AMD part also has a documented transistor count of 10,700 million and a die size of 180 mm², neither of which is recorded for the Intel part.

For users prioritizing measured performance, low power consumption, and modern memory standards, the Intel Core 3 305 is the only choice with data backing it. For users prioritizing core count, overclocking flexibility, and desktop socket compatibility, the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G offers the structural specifications, but the database provides no evidence of its actual performance level.