AMD Ryzen 7 3750H vs Intel Core i7-6700TE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H and Intel Core i7-6700TE are both 35W, 4-core, 8-thread processors, yet they deliver surprisingly different performance profiles depending on the workload. The data shows a clear generational and architectural split: the Ryzen 7 3750H, a 2019 mobile part based on Zen+, tends to dominate in older Cinebench R15 tests and Geekbench multicore, while the Intel Core i7-6700TE, a 2015 desktop Skylake chip, fights back in Cinebench R23 multicore and Geekbench single-core. Neither CPU holds a universal advantage, making the choice highly dependent on which benchmark suite—and thus which real-world application—matters most to you.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H boosts up to 4.00 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-6700TE tops out at 3.40 GHz. The Ryzen also starts at a slightly lower 2.30 GHz base clock versus the Intel’s 2.40 GHz.

Q: How do their cache configurations differ?

A: The Intel Core i7-6700TE has a larger 8 MB shared L3 cache, whereas the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H offers only 4 MB of shared L3. However, the AMD part provides more L1 (96 KB per core vs. 64 KB) and L2 (512 KB per core vs. 256 KB) per core.

Q: Which processor wins the most head-to-head benchmark comparisons?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H wins 4 of the 6 head-to-head benchmark tests. The Intel Core i7-6700TE wins the remaining 2 tests.

Q: What is the single biggest performance gap between them?

A: In Cinebench R15 single-core, the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H scores 144 versus the Intel’s 74, a massive 94.6% advantage. This is the largest delta in either direction across all compared tests.

Q: Are both CPUs on the same manufacturing process?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H uses a 12 nm process from GlobalFoundries, while the Intel Core i7-6700TE uses a 14 nm process from Intel.

Q: Do both support the same memory type?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Intel part lists a specific memory bandwidth of 34.1 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure is listed for the AMD part.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is the clear winner for legacy benchmark workloads and heavily threaded tasks that scale with its higher clock speeds. Its 38.2% lead in Cinebench R15 multicore (734 vs. 531) and 9.3% lead in Geekbench multicore (3446 vs. 3154) show that older rendering and productivity suites favor the AMD chip’s Zen+ architecture. The Ryzen also dominates in Cinebench R23 single-core with a 30.5% advantage (971 vs. 744), making it the better choice for lightly threaded applications that rely on per-core speed within that benchmark.

The Intel Core i7-6700TE wins in the two tests that matter most for modern multi-threaded rendering: Cinebench R23. Its 5273 multicore score beats the AMD’s 3897 by 26.1%, a significant reversal that suggests the Intel chip’s larger 8 MB L3 cache helps in sustained, memory-heavy workloads. The Intel part also edges out the AMD in Geekbench single-core (1028 vs. 950, a 7.6% lead), indicating a slight advantage in certain single-threaded integer workloads. If your primary concern is Cinebench R23 performance or specific single-threaded Geekbench tasks, the Intel CPU is the one to pick.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is built on the Zen+ architecture (codenamed Picasso) using a 12 nm process from GlobalFoundries. This is a mobile-focused design with an integrated Radeon Vega 10 GPU. The Intel Core i7-6700TE uses the older Skylake architecture on a 14 nm process from Intel, paired with HD Graphics 530. The process node difference (12 nm vs. 14 nm) is notable, though the Intel chip compensates with a larger shared L3 cache (8 MB vs. 4 MB).

The cache hierarchy diverges significantly: AMD allocates more L1 (96 KB per core) and L2 (512 KB per core) cache, while Intel relies on double the shared L3. The Intel part is a desktop segment processor on Socket 1151, whereas the AMD is a mobile part on AMD Socket FP5. Both CPUs lack ECC memory support and have locked multipliers. The AMD part includes 4,940 million transistors on a 210 mm² die, while transistor and die size data are not provided for the Intel chip.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 3750H | Intel Core i7-6700TE |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 2.30 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.00 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Architecture | Zen+ | Skylake |

| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | Intel |

| L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 34.1 GB/s |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP5 | Intel Socket 1151 |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 | HD Graphics 530 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2019-01-05 | 2015-08-31 |

| Transistors | 4,940 million | Not listed |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | Not listed |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result is in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H scores 144 against the Intel Core i7-6700TE’s 74. That 94.6% delta is enormous and suggests the Intel chip’s Skylake architecture was severely underperforming in this particular test, likely due to thermal or power management characteristics in the benchmark environment. The AMD also wins Cinebench R15 multicore decisively, scoring 734 vs. 531 (a 38.2% advantage), reinforcing its strength in older rendering benchmarks.

In Cinebench R23, the tables turn dramatically. The Intel Core i7-6700TE scores 5273 in multicore, beating the AMD’s 3897 by 26.1%. This is the largest win for Intel and indicates that the newer R23 test rewards the Intel chip’s larger L3 cache and desktop-class design. However, in Cinebench R23 single-core, the AMD strikes back with a 971 score versus Intel’s 744, a 30.5% lead. This split between R15 and R23 results is unusual and points to differing optimization characteristics between benchmark versions.

Geekbench results are closer. The AMD wins multicore with 3446 vs. 3154 (9.3% ahead), but the Intel wins single-core with 1028 vs. 950 (7.6% ahead). These modest deltas suggest that in general-purpose computing, the two CPUs are more evenly matched than the Cinebench extremes imply. The overall win count (4 for AMD, 2 for Intel) aligns with the AMD’s slightly higher average benchmark score of 1690 versus Intel’s 1666, though both sit at the 40th percentile among all CPUs.

The Verdict

The data does not crown a single winner. The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is the better pick for anyone working with older Cinebench R15 workloads or Geekbench multicore tasks, where its higher boost clock and per-core cache configuration deliver leads of 38.2% and 9.3%, respectively. It also crushes the Intel chip in Cinebench R23 single-core by 30.5%, making it the stronger choice for lightly threaded rendering tasks.

The Intel Core i7-6700TE is the right choice for Cinebench R23 multicore workloads, where its 26.1% advantage (5273 vs. 3897) is substantial. Its 8 MB L3 cache and desktop platform design clearly help in sustained, heavily threaded rendering. It also wins Geekbench single-core by 7.6%, making it slightly better for certain single-threaded applications.

Choose the AMD if your software stack resembles older Cinebench or multi-core Geekbench scenarios. Choose the Intel if you prioritize modern Cinebench R23 multicore performance or specific single-threaded Geekbench results. Both are 35W, 4-core/8-thread parts with DDR4 support, so platform compatibility and integrated graphics preferences (Radeon Vega 10 vs. HD Graphics 530) may also factor into the decision. The benchmark data ultimately shows a split decision: the AMD wins more tests, but the Intel wins the most demanding modern render test by a wide margin.