AMD Ryzen 7 3750H vs Intel Core i7-4910MQ Comparison

The Intel Core i7-4910MQ and AMD Ryzen 7 3750H are both quad-core, eight-thread mobile processors, but they come from different eras and design philosophies. The Intel part is a 2014 Haswell chip, while the AMD is a 2019 Zen+ part. The benchmark data reveals a split decision: the AMD chip wins most single-threaded and older multi-threaded tests, while the Intel chip takes the newer Cinebench R23 multi-core test and a single Geekbench score. Their overall average benchmark scores are remarkably close, with the Intel at 1716 and the AMD at 1690, placing them at the 41st and 40th percentiles of all CPUs respectively. This makes the choice heavily dependent on which specific workloads you prioritize.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result is in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, where the Intel Core i7-4910MQ posts a score of 5326 against the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H's 3897. This is a 36.7% victory for Intel, suggesting a significant advantage in sustained, modern multi-threaded rendering workloads. The margin is substantial and indicates that the older Haswell architecture, despite its age, handles this particular threaded workload more efficiently.

However, the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H dominates the older Cinebench R15 tests. In the R15 multi-core test, AMD scores 734 versus Intel's 536, a 27% lead for AMD. The single-core R15 result is even more lopsided, with AMD at 144 and Intel at just 75, a 47.9% difference. This is a massive gap in a legacy benchmark, suggesting that the Ryzen 7 3750H's architecture is far more efficient in this specific test scenario.

The Geekbench results are a mixed bag. In the multi-core test, the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H edges out a win with a score of 3446 versus Intel's 3368, a narrow 2.3% margin. But the single-core Geekbench test flips in favor of Intel, with a score of 1116 compared to AMD's 950, giving Intel a 17.5% advantage. This split highlights that the two processors have different performance profiles depending on the benchmark's coding and workload.

In the Cinebench R23 single-core test, the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H takes a clear win with 971 points versus Intel's 752, a 22.6% advantage. This shows that in the most recent Cinebench iteration, AMD has the stronger single-threaded performance. Overall, AMD wins 4 of the 6 head-to-head benchmarks, but Intel's single R23 multi-core win is so large that it keeps the average scores nearly identical.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-4910MQ has a slightly higher average benchmark score of 1716, compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H's 1690. This puts the Intel part at the 41st percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD part sits at the 40th percentile.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H win in all single-core tests?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H wins the Cinebench R15 single-core test (144 vs 75) and the Cinebench R23 single-core test (971 vs 752). However, the Intel Core i7-4910MQ wins the Geekbench single-core test with a score of 1116 versus AMD's 950.

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-4910MQ better for modern multi-threaded workloads?

A: Yes, the data supports this. In the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, the Intel Core i7-4910MQ scores 5326, which is 36.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H's 3897. This is the most recent multi-threaded benchmark in the data set.

Q: What is the TDP difference between these two processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-4910MQ has a TDP of 47 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H has a lower TDP of 35 watts. This indicates the AMD part is designed for lower power consumption.

Q: Which processor has more cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-4910MQ has a larger L3 cache at 8 MB shared, compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H's 4 MB shared. However, the AMD part has more L1 and L2 cache per core, with 96 KB and 512 KB respectively, versus Intel's 64 KB and 256 KB.

Q: How do these CPUs compare to their nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-4910MQ is nearly identical in average score to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U, with a 0% deltaPct, and is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-990X. The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-3770K and 0.1% behind the Intel Core i7-980.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent distinct architectural generations. The Intel Core i7-4910MQ is built on the Haswell architecture using a 22 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H uses the Zen+ architecture, specifically the Picasso codename, and is manufactured on a 12 nm node by GlobalFoundries. This process difference is significant, with AMD's node being newer and denser.

The transistor counts reflect this. The Intel chip contains 1,400 million transistors on a 177 mm² die, while the AMD chip packs 4,940 million transistors into a 210 mm² die. This massive difference in transistor count is a key architectural distinction, likely enabling more complex logic and features in the AMD design.

Memory support also differs. The Intel Core i7-4910MQ supports DDR3 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s. The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H supports DDR4 memory, also dual-channel, but its memory bandwidth is not specified in the data. The Intel chip uses an Intel Socket G3, while the AMD chip uses an AMD Socket FP5.

The integrated graphics are also different. Intel uses the Intel HD 4600, while AMD uses the Radeon Vega 10. The PCIe support differs as well: Intel has Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while AMD lists simply Gen 3. The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $570, whereas the AMD part has no listed launch MSRP. The Intel part is end-of-life, while the AMD part is still active in production.

The Verdict

The data paints a clear picture of two processors with different strengths. If your primary workload is modern multi-threaded rendering, specifically as measured by Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core i7-4910MQ is the clear choice, offering a 36.7% performance advantage over the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H. This is a decisive win in a relevant, current benchmark.

However, if you rely on legacy benchmarks or a broader mix of workloads, the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is generally faster. It wins the Cinebench R15 multi-core and single-core tests by 27% and 47.9% respectively, and also wins Geekbench multi-core by 2.3% and Cinebench R23 single-core by 22.6%. The AMD part also does this with a lower 35-watt TDP, making it more power-efficient. The Intel part only counters with a win in Geekbench single-core and the R23 multi-core test.

For a typical user running a variety of applications, the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H's wins in more benchmark categories suggest it is the more versatile performer. The Intel chip's massive R23 multi-core win is notable, but it appears to be an outlier in an otherwise AMD-favorable dataset. The choice ultimately comes down to whether that single R23 multi-core result is your most critical workload.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The Intel Core i7-4910MQ has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H has a lower base clock of 2.30 GHz but a higher boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The TDP differs, with Intel at 47 watts and AMD at 35 watts.

The cache hierarchy is different. Intel has 64 KB of L1 and 256 KB of L2 per core, plus 8 MB of shared L3. AMD has 96 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, but only 4 MB of shared L3. The process node is 22 nm for Intel and 12 nm for AMD. The transistor count is 1,400 million for Intel versus 4,940 million for AMD, and the die size is 177 mm² for Intel versus 210 mm² for AMD.

Memory support is a major difference: Intel uses DDR3 while AMD uses DDR4. The Intel chip has a specified memory bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s, while the AMD chip has no listed bandwidth. The sockets are incompatible: Intel Socket G3 for the Intel part and AMD Socket FP5 for the AMD part. The integrated graphics are Intel HD 4600 versus Radeon Vega 10. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $570, while the AMD part has none listed. The Intel part is end-of-life, while the AMD part is active.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is the winner for most general-purpose tasks. It has a decisive advantage in Cinebench R15, both single-core and multi-core, which are older but still commonly used benchmarks. It also wins in the more recent Cinebench R23 single-core test and Geekbench multi-core. This makes it a strong choice for everyday computing, legacy software, and applications that rely on single-threaded performance or a balanced mix of threads. Its lower TDP also makes it better suited for thinner, more power-efficient laptops.

The Intel Core i7-4910MQ is the winner for specific modern multi-threaded rendering workloads, as evidenced by its 36.7% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core. This is a significant advantage for tasks like video rendering or 3D modeling that heavily utilize all cores in the most current Cinebench iteration. It also wins in Geekbench single-core, which could be relevant for certain single-threaded applications that are optimized for that benchmark. However, its higher TDP and end-of-life status are drawbacks to consider.