CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD Ryzen 7 260

CORE STATE Hawk Point

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.8 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 16 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 45W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

Intel

INTEL

Core 3 N355

CORE STATE Twin Lake

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 8 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 1.9 Base / 3.9 GHz Turbo

CACHE 6 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 15W

ARCHITECTURE Twin Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

2,562

871

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

361

122

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

10,679

3,631

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

1,507

512

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

25,427

8,647

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

3,589

1,220

passmark_data_compression

351,517

117,435

passmark_data_encryption

20,267

8,121

passmark_extended_instructions

26,544

5,968

passmark_find_prime_numbers

passmark_floating_point_math

59,462

22,695

passmark_integer_math

96,737

33,894

passmark_multithread

28,078

10,174

passmark_physics

1,218

625

passmark_random_string_sorting

42,383

14,706

passmark_single_thread

3,736

2,153

passmark_singlethread

3,736

2,153

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 260 vs Intel Core 3 N355

Benchmark hunters examining AMD's AMD Ryzen 7 260 chip against Intel Core 3 N355 (Intel) might notice right away that AMD's AMD Ryzen 7 260 chip takes the crown. This processor excels in intensive scenarios, rendering it ideal for power users. Its technical upgrades over Intel Core 3 N355 (Intel) lead into measurable everyday benefits. Whether it's professional work, AMD's AMD Ryzen 7 260 chip consistently surpasses its competitor. The gap is substantial enough to affect practical scenarios.

The score gap between AMD's AMD Ryzen 7 260 chip and Intel Core 3 N355 (Intel) becomes notably clear in multi-threaded scenarios. Applications like code compilation demonstrate AMD's AMD Ryzen 7 260 chip's strengths. Its greater cores give significant throughput for intensive scenarios. Such throughput leads into faster execution periods. Efficiency benefits are noticeable and substantial.

Ultimately: AMD's AMD Ryzen 7 260 chip takes this matchup decisively. Consumers prioritizing power will seriously choose AMD's AMD Ryzen 7 260 chip over Intel Core 3 N355 (Intel). This benchmark evidence demonstrates this recommendation. Your scenarios can gain from the better performance. It's a clear winner in this class.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

7 260

3 N355

Core Specs

Cores

8 0.0%

Threads

8 -50.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.8

1.9 -50.0%

Boost Clock (GHz)

5.1

3.9 -23.5%

Frequency (GHz)

3.8

1.9 -50.0%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

5.1

3.9 -23.5%

Multiplier

1 -97.4%

SMP CPUs

1 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

96 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (shared)

L3 Cache

16 MB (shared)

6 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

15 -66.7%

Configurable TDP

35-54 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Twin Lake

Codename

Hawk Point

Twin Lake

Generation

Ryzen 7 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))

Core 3 (Alder Lake-N)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

25,000 million

—

Die Size

178 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5

Memory Bus

Dual-channel

Single-channel

Memory Bandwidth

89.6 GB/s

38.4 GB/s

ECC Memory

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket FP8

Intel BGA 1264

PCIe

Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 3, 9 Lanes(CPU only)

AI/NPU

XDNA NPU

16 TOPS

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

Radeon 780M

UHD Graphics 770

Other

Market

Mobile

Production Status

Active

Part Number

100-000001724

SRPNT

Package

FP8, FP7, FP7r2

FC-BGA16F

Tj Max

100°C

105°C

View Ryzen 7 260 Details View Core 3 N355 Details