CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD Ryzen 7 250

CORE STATE Hawk Point

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 16 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 28W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

Intel

INTEL

Core 3 N355

CORE STATE Twin Lake

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 8 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 1.9 Base / 3.9 GHz Turbo

CACHE 6 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 15W

ARCHITECTURE Twin Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

2,005

871

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

282

122

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

8,356

3,631

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

1,179

512

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

19,896

8,647

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

2,808

1,220

passmark_data_compression

300,708

117,435

passmark_data_encryption

17,661

8,121

passmark_extended_instructions

21,613

5,968

passmark_find_prime_numbers

passmark_floating_point_math

53,285

22,695

passmark_integer_math

91,565

33,894

passmark_multithread

25,089

10,174

passmark_physics

1,147

625

passmark_random_string_sorting

35,861

14,706

passmark_single_thread

3,678

2,153

passmark_singlethread

3,678

2,153

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 250 vs Intel Core 3 N355

During this direct matchup, AMD AMD Ryzen 7 250 processor stands as the clear leader. Its benchmark figures demonstrate significant advantages in every single-threaded scenarios. Whether you're putting together a high-performance PC, AMD AMD Ryzen 7 250 processor offers superior capability for the price. This silicon handles heavy computations with efficiency. This is particularly obvious in practical applications.

Gaming results furthermore support AMD AMD Ryzen 7 250 processor in this evaluation. Higher frame rates and improved consistent delivery result from the better single-threaded capability. Those who game will notice better gameplay, specifically in CPU-limited situations. This benefit continues throughout various scenarios. Esports scenarios notably advantages from this capability advantage.

At the end of the day: AMD AMD Ryzen 7 250 processor claims this matchup clearly. Users wanting performance will certainly select AMD AMD Ryzen 7 250 processor over Intel Intel Core 3 N355 CPU. This benchmark evidence confirms this assessment. Your scenarios might improve from its stronger power. It's a obvious winner in this tier.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

7 250

3 N355

Core Specs

Cores

8 0.0%

Threads

8 -50.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.3

1.9 -42.4%

Boost Clock (GHz)

5.1

3.9 -23.5%

Frequency (GHz)

3.3

1.9 -42.4%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

5.1

3.9 -23.5%

Multiplier

1 -97.0%

SMP CPUs

1 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

96 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (shared)

L3 Cache

16 MB (shared)

6 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

15 -46.4%

Configurable TDP

15-30 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Twin Lake

Codename

Hawk Point

Twin Lake

Generation

Ryzen 7 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))

Core 3 (Alder Lake-N)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

25,000 million

—

Die Size

178 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5

Memory Bus

Dual-channel

Single-channel

Memory Bandwidth

89.6 GB/s

38.4 GB/s

ECC Memory

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket FP8

Intel BGA 1264

PCIe

Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 3, 9 Lanes(CPU only)

AI/NPU

XDNA NPU

16 TOPS

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

Radeon 780M

UHD Graphics 770

Other

Market

Mobile

Production Status

Active

Part Number

100-000001722

SRPNT

Package

FP8, FP7, FP7r2

FC-BGA16F

Tj Max

100°C

105°C

View Ryzen 7 250 Details View Core 3 N355 Details