AMD Ryzen 7 250 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data presents an unusual matchup. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 arrives with a full suite of benchmark results, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 currently has no recorded benchmark scores. This means the Ryzen 7 250 holds wins in every measured category by default, though the qualitative picture is more balanced.

For workloads that rely on raw multi-threaded throughput, the Ryzen 7 250 shows strong results. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14,676 and Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2,302 indicate solid sustained performance across all 8 cores and 16 threads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25,089 reinforces this, placing the chip firmly in the upper tier of mobile processors. Integer math results are particularly strong at 91,565 in PassMark, suggesting good performance in general-purpose computing tasks such as compilation, spreadsheet operations, and database queries.

Single-thread performance is also a clear strength for the AMD part. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,715 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,678 demonstrate that the Zen 4 architecture scales well at lower core counts. This benefits lightly threaded applications like web browsing, office productivity, and many legacy games that rely on one or two fast cores.

The Ryzen 7 250 also shows advantages in specialized computational tasks. Its PassMark floating-point math score of 53,285 and extended instructions score of 21,613 point to capable performance in scientific computing, 3D rendering, and encryption workloads. Data compression at 300,708 and data encryption at 17,661 further support this pattern.

For the Snapdragon X2E-94-100, the absence of benchmark data means no direct wins can be credited. However, its specifications suggest that it targets a different workload profile. With 18 cores and 18 threads, it offers more parallel execution units than the Ryzen 7 250. The higher base clock of 4.45 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz indicate that its designers prioritized frequency scaling. The triple-channel LPDDR5X memory interface with 228.6 GB/s of bandwidth is significantly wider than the AMD chip's dual-channel DDR5 at 89.6 GB/s. This points toward memory-bandwidth-intensive tasks such as large dataset manipulation, AI inference, and media processing.

The architecture difference is stark: the Snapdragon uses a 3 nm process node versus the Ryzen's 4 nm node, and it carries a larger die at 220 mm² compared to 178 mm². The Snapdragon's cache hierarchy also differs substantially, with 288 KB of L1 per core and 16 MB of L2 per module, though its shared L3 is smaller at 9 MB versus the AMD's 16 MB. These structural differences suggest the Snapdragon may excel in workloads that benefit from massive L2 capacity and high memory bandwidth, while the AMD part leans on its larger L3 cache and higher boost clock for burst performance.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally divergent design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 is built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point, and fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process. It integrates 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 uses a 3 nm process from the same foundry, with a larger 220 mm² die and no transistor count recorded.

Core counts diverge sharply. The Ryzen 7 250 has 8 cores and 16 threads, relying on simultaneous multithreading to double its logical processors. The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has 18 cores and 18 threads, with no multithreading. This gives the AMD part a higher thread-per-core ratio, while the Qualcomm chip offers nearly double the physical cores.

Clock speeds tell a similar story. The Ryzen 7 250 has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, a 1.80 GHz boost headroom. The Snapdragon has a base clock of 4.45 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, a much smaller 0.25 GHz boost range. The AMD chip's higher boost frequency should help in short, single-threaded bursts, while the Snapdragon's near-flat frequency curve suggests consistent throughput across all cores.

Cache layouts are entirely different. The Ryzen 7 250 uses 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Snapdragon uses 288 KB of L1 per core, 16 MB of L2 per module, and only 9 MB of shared L3. The Snapdragon's L2 is organized per module rather than per core, which is typical of ARM-derived designs. Its total cache footprint, when accounting for 18 cores, is likely much larger than the AMD's, but the shared L3 deficit could hurt in scenarios with high cache thrash.

Memory support also differs. The Ryzen 7 250 supports DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Snapdragon supports LPDDR5X in a triple-channel configuration with 228.6 GB/s of bandwidth. That is a 2.55 times bandwidth advantage for the Qualcomm part, which is crucial for memory-bound workloads. PCIe connectivity also differs: the AMD chip has Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Snapdragon has Gen 5 with 12 lanes, offering newer signaling but fewer lanes.

Integrated graphics differentiate the platforms. The Ryzen 7 250 uses Radeon 780M, while the Snapdragon uses Adreno X2-90. Neither has recorded graphics benchmarks in the database. The thermal design power differs as well: the Ryzen 7 250 is rated at 28 W, while the Snapdragon has no TDP recorded. The AMD part uses Socket FP8, while the Snapdragon uses Qualcomm BGA 2343. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pairing, and the Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has no individual benchmark scores. All measured wins therefore belong to the AMD Ryzen 7 250. The most decisive margins are in multi-core workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14,676 places the Ryzen 7 250 at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the Snapdragon sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero due to missing data.

Looking at the Ryzen 7 250's nearest rivals provides context for its performance level. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T averages 38,194 with a delta of 0.1 percent against the AMD chip's 38,221. The Intel Core i5-13600HX averages 38,261, a 0.1 percent deficit. The Intel Core i5-14490F averages 38,149, a 0.2 percent advantage. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H averages 38,312, a 0.2 percent deficit. These four rivals cluster within 0.4 percent of each other, indicating that the Ryzen 7 250 is right in the middle of a tight pack of competitive mobile and desktop processors.

Within the Ryzen 7 250's own benchmark suite, the strongest results appear in integer math (91,565), floating-point math (53,285), and data compression (300,708). The weakest recorded score is the PassMark find prime numbers test at 73, which is likely a scaled metric rather than an absolute count. The single-thread PassMark score of 3,678 is nearly identical to the multi-thread score of 25,089 when accounting for the core count, suggesting good scaling efficiency.

Because the Snapdragon has no scores, any comparison must rely on architectural inference. The Snapdragon's 18 physical cores at a 4.45 GHz base clock could theoretically generate high multi-thread throughput, but without measured data, no quantitative claim can be made. The 228.6 GB/s memory bandwidth gives it a structural advantage in bandwidth-limited workloads, but the 9 MB shared L3 could become a bottleneck with 18 cores contending for it.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has 18 cores and 18 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 250 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 250 boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 boosts to 4.70 GHz. The AMD chip also has a lower base clock of 3.30 GHz compared to 4.45 GHz for the Snapdragon.

Q: How does memory bandwidth compare?

A: The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 provides 228.6 GB/s over a triple-channel LPDDR5X interface, while the Ryzen 7 250 provides 89.6 GB/s over a dual-channel DDR5 interface.

Q: Which chip has a larger shared L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 250 has 16 MB of shared L3, while the Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has 9 MB of shared L3. However, the Snapdragon has 16 MB of L2 per module, versus 1 MB per core for the AMD.

Q: What are the process nodes?

A: The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 uses a 3 nm process, while the Ryzen 7 250 uses a 4 nm process. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores for the Snapdragon?

A: No, the database contains no benchmark scores for the Snapdragon X2E-94-100. The Ryzen 7 250 has 15 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark tests.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 250 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 18 |

| Threads | 16 | 18 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 4.45 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | Not recorded |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Qualcomm BGA 2343 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Not recorded |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Glymur |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | 220 mm² |

| Transistors | 25,000 million | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 288 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 16 MB per module |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB shared | 9 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Triple-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 228.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 lanes | Gen 5, 12 lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M | Adreno X2-90 |

| Part Number | 100-000001722 | X2E94100 |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2026-04-05 |

The release dates place the Ryzen 7 250 in early 2025 and the Snapdragon in early 2026, a 15-month gap. The Ryzen 7 250 is built for a conventional x86 ecosystem with a 28 W TDP, while the Snapdragon targets the Arm ecosystem with no recorded power envelope. The AMD chip has 4 more PCIe lanes but older Gen 4 signaling, while the Snapdragon uses newer Gen 5 with fewer lanes. Neither chip supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.