AMD Ryzen 7 170 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 170 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 occupy different positions in the mobile processor landscape, and the recorded data shows a clear split in their intended workloads. The Ryzen 7 170 is built around a conventional high-performance x86 architecture with simultaneous multithreading, while the Snapdragon X1E-84-100 uses a 12-core, 12-thread Oryon arrangement that prioritizes power efficiency through a smaller process node.

For the AMD Ryzen 7 170, the benchmark suite reveals a processor that excels in sustained multi-threaded and single-threaded compute tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 3128 places it in a strong position for lightly threaded applications such as web browsing, office productivity, and legacy software that relies on high per-core performance. The multi-thread score of 20760, combined with an integer math score of 79738 and a floating-point math score of 44979, indicates that the chip handles complex scientific calculations, financial modeling, and content creation workloads with substantial headroom. The data compression score of 265920 further reinforces this, showing a processor that can manage large dataset operations efficiently. The extended instructions score of 18107 and the data encryption score of 16078 both point to a capable execution engine for modern instruction sets and security-related tasks.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100, by contrast, has no benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its percentile ranking against all CPUs is 50, which reflects an absence of measured data rather than a performance ceiling. The processor's design parameters tell a different story from the AMD part. It uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, compared to the 6 nm node for the Ryzen 7 170, which suggests a focus on power efficiency and thermal management. The base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 4.20 GHz are higher than the Ryzen's 3.20 GHz base and 4.75 GHz boost, but the Snapdragon lacks simultaneous multithreading, meaning its 12 cores handle 12 threads. The memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s for LPDDR5X is significantly higher than the Ryzen's 76.8 GB/s for DDR5, which can benefit memory-intensive workloads such as large in-memory databases or high-resolution media processing.

The wins for each processor are therefore defined by the data available. The Ryzen 7 170 wins in every measured benchmark because it has recorded scores, while the Snapdragon has no measured wins. However, the architectural differences suggest that the Snapdragon's advantage would lie in scenarios where memory bandwidth and power efficiency matter more than raw thread execution, such as fanless designs or battery-constrained environments.

The Verdict

The database shows that the AMD Ryzen 7 170 holds an 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 sits at the 50th percentile due to its lack of benchmark data. For users who require proven, measured performance across a broad range of tasks, the Ryzen 7 170 is the only option with verified results. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, enabled by Zen 3+ architecture on the Rembrandt-R codename, deliver a multi-thread score of 20760 and a single-thread score of 3128. These figures, combined with the nearest rival comparisons, place the Ryzen 7 170 within a tight performance cluster. The closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745, has an average score of 43704, which is 0% different from the Ryzen 7 170's average benchmark score of 43689. The AMD Ryzen 7 260 is 0.1% behind, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 is 0.6% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is 0.8% ahead. This indicates that the Ryzen 7 170 delivers performance that is essentially at parity with its closest competitors, making it a predictable and consistent choice for workloads that demand multi-threaded capability.

For the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100, the absence of measured scores means that any performance assessment must rely solely on its specifications. The 12-core, 12-thread configuration, the 4 nm process, and the 135.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are all notable, but without benchmark data, the database cannot confirm real-world behavior. Users who prioritize the highest memory bandwidth in a mobile package and value the efficiency of a smaller process node might consider the Snapdragon, but the lack of measured results introduces uncertainty. The Ryzen 7 170, with its active production status and confirmed benchmark performance, offers a safer choice for those who need verified numbers.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Since the head-to-head benchmark array for these two processors is empty, the comparison must draw from the individual benchmark scores recorded for the AMD Ryzen 7 170 and the architectural specifications of the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100. The Ryzen 7 170 delivers a single-thread score of 3128, which is a strong result for a mobile processor. Its multi-thread score of 20760 reflects the benefit of 16 threads over 8 physical cores. In integer math, the score of 79738 shows a high throughput for arithmetic and logic operations, while the floating-point math score of 44979 indicates robust handling of decimal calculations, which is relevant for scientific simulations and 3D rendering.

The data compression benchmark for the Ryzen 7 170 returns 265920, a figure that demonstrates efficient handling of data reduction algorithms. The random string sorting score of 27804 and the extended instructions score of 18107 further support the processor's capability in data manipulation and modern instruction workloads. The physics score of 890 and the find prime numbers score of 49 are lower in absolute terms but still represent measured performance in specific computational tasks. The data encryption score of 16078 shows the processor can handle cryptographic operations with reasonable speed.

For the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100, there are no equivalent scores to compare. The database records no benchmarks for this processor, so any head-to-head comparison must be limited to the differences in their specifications. The Snapdragon has a higher base clock of 3.80 GHz versus the Ryzen's 3.20 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz versus the Ryzen's 4.75 GHz. The Snapdragon also has more cores (12 versus 8) but fewer threads (12 versus 16) due to the lack of SMT. The memory bandwidth difference is stark: the Snapdragon's 135.2 GB/s is nearly double the Ryzen's 76.8 GB/s. These specifications suggest that the Snapdragon could outperform the Ryzen in memory-bound tasks, but the absence of benchmark data prevents any confirmation.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-thread performance based on the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has a recorded single-thread score of 3128. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has no benchmark scores in the database, so no direct comparison can be made.

Q: How do the core and thread counts differ between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads. The Ryzen uses simultaneous multithreading to double its thread count, whereas the Snapdragon does not.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two processors?

A: The Ryzen 7 170 supports dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Snapdragon X1E-84-100 supports dual-channel LPDDR5X with a memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s, which is substantially higher.

Q: Are there any benchmark results for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark scores for the Snapdragon X1E-84-100, resulting in an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile ranking of 50.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 170 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 7 170 has an average benchmark score of 43689. The closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745, scores 43704 (0% difference). The AMD Ryzen 7 260 scores 43717 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 scores 43431 (0.6% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 scores 43326 (0.8% ahead).

Q: Which processor uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the AMD Ryzen 7 170 uses a 6 nm process from the same foundry.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 170 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 diverge significantly in their underlying architectures. The Ryzen 7 170 is based on the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It has a die size of 210 mm² and uses an AMD Socket FP7. The processor includes 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.75 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The memory controller supports dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and includes ECC memory support. The integrated graphics are handled by the Radeon 680M. The processor provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes for the CPU and has an unlocked multiplier set to false. Its production status is active, with a release date in September 2025.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 uses the Oryon codename under the Snapdragon X (Elite) generation. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, which is smaller than the Ryzen's node. The processor uses a Qualcomm BGA 2073 socket and has 12 cores with 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. The cache structure includes 288 KB of L1 per core, 12 MB of L2 per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The memory support is dual-channel LPDDR5X with a bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s, and there is no ECC memory support. The integrated graphics are the Adreno X1-85. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 12 lanes for the CPU. The multiplier is not unlocked, and the production status is active with a release date in April 2024.

The architectural differences highlight a trade-off between raw compute capability and memory throughput. The Ryzen 7 170 uses a larger process node but compensates with simultaneous multithreading and a higher boost clock, yielding measured performance in the database. The Snapdragon X1E-84-100 uses a smaller node for better power characteristics and provides a higher memory bandwidth, but its lack of benchmark data leaves its real-world performance unquantified. The cache configurations also differ, with the Snapdragon offering more L1 per core and more L2 per module, while the Ryzen provides a larger shared L3 cache. These structural choices reflect different design priorities: the Ryzen targets multi-threaded x86 compatibility, while the Snapdragon aims for efficiency and high memory throughput in a compact package.