AMD Ryzen 7 170 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 Comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 170
Snapdragon X1E-80-100
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 170 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100
The AMD Ryzen 7 170 and Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 are both mobile processors with a 35 W TDP, but they represent different design philosophies. The Ryzen 7 170 is an 8-core, 16-thread part based on Zen 3+ architecture, while the Snapdragon X1E-80-100 is a 12-core, 12-thread part using Qualcomm's Oryon cores. The recorded benchmark data shows a clear performance differential, though the Snapdragon's lack of benchmark scores in the database limits direct comparison. The Ryzen 7 170 holds an 88th percentile rank among all CPUs, while the Snapdragon sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0 in the database. This page analyzes the available data, focusing on the Ryzen 7 170's measured performance and the architectural differences that define both processors.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen 7 170 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100. The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has an empty benchmarks array, meaning no PassMark scores are recorded for it. The Ryzen 7 170, however, has a full set of PassMark results, allowing an analysis of its strengths and weaknesses in absolute terms.
The Ryzen 7 170's strongest measured performance appears in the PassMark data compression test, where it scores 265,920. This result dwarfs its other scores, indicating a high throughput for compression workloads. The floating point math score is 44,979, while integer math reaches 79,738. The random string sorting test yields 27,804, and extended instructions score 18,107. Data encryption records 16,078. The single-thread score is 3,128, and the multithread score is 20,760. The find prime numbers test shows a score of 49, and the physics test records 890.
The average benchmark score for the Ryzen 7 170 is 43,689. Its nearest rivals in the database provide context for this figure. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 has an average score of 43,704, a delta of 0 percent relative to the Ryzen 7 170. The AMD Ryzen 7 260 scores 43,717, which is 0.1 percent lower than the Ryzen 7 170. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 scores 43,431, 0.6 percent higher than the Ryzen 7 170. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 scores 43,326, 0.8 percent higher. These small deltas place the Ryzen 7 170 in a tight cluster with other recent AMD mobile parts. The Ryzen 7 170 sits at the 88th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 88 percent of the processors in the database.
The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has no recorded scores, so its percentile rank of 50 and average score of 0 cannot be interpreted as a measure of its actual performance. The data simply shows a lack of benchmark entries. This means the head-to-head comparison is incomplete. The Ryzen 7 170's multithread score of 20,760 and single-thread score of 3,128 serve as the only numerical performance data points from this pair. The Snapdragon's 12 cores and 12 threads suggest a different threading model, but without scores, no performance inference can be made.
The Ryzen 7 170's data encryption score of 16,078 and extended instructions score of 18,107 indicate that it handles cryptographic and SIMD workloads with moderate efficiency. The integer math score of 79,738 is notably higher than the floating point score of 44,979, suggesting that the processor is more efficient with integer operations. The physics score of 890 appears low relative to the multithread score, which might reflect the specific workload of that test. The find prime numbers score of 49 is the lowest raw number, but this test often produces small scores across processors.
The nearest rival deltas show that the Ryzen 7 170 is statistically tied with the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745, as the delta is 0 percent. Against the Ryzen 7 260, the Ryzen 7 170 is 0.1 percent faster, which is negligible. Against the Ryzen AI 9 465 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, the Ryzen 7 170 is 0.6 percent and 0.8 percent faster, respectively. These differences are within a single percentage point, indicating that the Ryzen 7 170 performs nearly identically to its closest competitors in the database.
FAQ
Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen 7 170?
A: The average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen 7 170 is 43,689. This places it at the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database, meaning it outperforms 88 percent of recorded processors.
Q: Does the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 have any benchmark scores in the database?
A: No. The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has an empty benchmarks array, so no PassMark scores are recorded. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile rank is 50, but these figures reflect the absence of data rather than measured performance.
Q: How does the Ryzen 7 170 compare to its nearest rivals in average score?
A: The Ryzen 7 170's average score of 43,689 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 scores 43,704 (0 percent delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 260 scores 43,717 (0.1 percent lower than the Ryzen 7 170), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 scores 43,431 (0.6 percent higher), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 scores 43,326 (0.8 percent higher). All deltas are less than 1 percent.
Q: What are the highest and lowest PassMark scores for the Ryzen 7 170?
A: The highest recorded score for the Ryzen 7 170 is 265,920 in the data compression test. The lowest recorded score is 49 in the find prime numbers test. Other scores include 79,738 for integer math, 44,979 for floating point math, and 20,760 for multithread.
Q: What is the TDP for both processors?
A: Both the AMD Ryzen 7 170 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 have a TDP of 35 watts. This is one of the few specifications where the two processors match exactly.
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 170 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Ryzen 7 170 uses simultaneous multithreading to double its thread count, whereas the Snapdragon has one thread per core.
The Verdict
The recorded data does not permit a performance verdict between the AMD Ryzen 7 170 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 because the database lacks any benchmark scores for the Snapdragon. The Ryzen 7 170 has a complete set of PassMark results, showing an average score of 43,689 and an 88th percentile rank. The Snapdragon has no scores, a 50th percentile rank, and an average score of 0. These figures for the Snapdragon should be read as missing data, not as a measured performance level.
For users who require a processor with proven benchmark results, the Ryzen 7 170 is the only option with recorded data in this pair. Its nearest rivals in the database, all AMD parts, score within 1 percent of its average, indicating that the Ryzen 7 170 is a competitive mobile processor in its class. The multithread score of 20,760 and single-thread score of 3,128 provide concrete reference points for workload expectations.
The Snapdragon X1E-80-100's architectural specifications, such as 12 cores and a 4 nm process node, cannot be translated into performance estimates without benchmark data. The database shows no wins for either processor in a head-to-head comparison, as no head-to-head benchmarks exist. Therefore, the verdict is limited to the Ryzen 7 170's measured performance, while the Snapdragon remains unquantified.
The Ryzen 7 170's 88th percentile rank suggests it outperforms the majority of CPUs in the database, but that rank is based solely on its own scores. The Snapdragon's 50th percentile rank is a default value due to missing data. In the absence of Snapdragon scores, the Ryzen 7 170 is the only processor in this pair with a measurable performance profile. Users who prioritize verified benchmark data would select the Ryzen 7 170, while those considering the Snapdragon would need to rely on external information not present in this database.
Specification Differences
The AMD Ryzen 7 170 and Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 differ across nearly every major specification. The Ryzen 7 170 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Snapdragon has 12 cores and 12 threads. The Ryzen 7 170's base clock is 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.75 GHz. The Snapdragon's base clock is 3.40 GHz with a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The TDP is identical at 35 watts for both.
The socket types differ: the Ryzen 7 170 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Snapdragon uses Qualcomm BGA 2073. The Ryzen 7 170's process node is 6 nm, while the Snapdragon is built on a 4 nm process. Both are fabricated by TSMC, but the die size differs: the Ryzen 7 170 has a die size of 210 mm², while the Snapdragon has no recorded die size.
Cache configurations are substantially different. The Ryzen 7 170 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Snapdragon has 288 KB of L1 cache per core, 12 MB of L2 cache per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. These cache sizes reflect different design goals, with the Ryzen 7 170 using a per-core L2 and the Snapdragon using a per-module L2.
Memory support differs: the Ryzen 7 170 supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Snapdragon supports LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a higher memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported on the Ryzen 7 170 but not on the Snapdragon. PCIe lanes also differ: the Ryzen 7 170 has Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Snapdragon has Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only).
The integrated graphics differ: the Ryzen 7 170 uses Radeon 680M, while the Snapdragon uses Adreno X1-85. The release dates are different: the Ryzen 7 170 was released on 2025-09-30, while the Snapdragon was released on 2024-04-23. The part numbers are 100-000000989 for the Ryzen 7 170 and X1E80100 for the Snapdragon. Both processors have a locked multiplier, and neither has a recorded launch MSRP.
Architecture Differences
The architectural differences between the AMD Ryzen 7 170 and Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 are fundamental. The Ryzen 7 170 uses the Zen 3+ architecture, with the codename Rembrandt-R, and belongs to the Ryzen 7 generation. The Snapdragon uses the Oryon codename, with no explicit architecture listed in the database, and belongs to the Snapdragon X (Elite) generation.
The process node difference is significant: 6 nm for the Ryzen 7 170 versus 4 nm for the Snapdragon. Both use TSMC as the foundry, but the smaller node for the Snapdragon generally allows for more transistors in a given area, though the Snapdragon's die size is not recorded. The Ryzen 7 170's die size of 210 mm² provides a physical reference point.
Core and thread organization reveals a key design divergence. The Ryzen 7 170 has 8 cores and 16 threads, indicating support for simultaneous multithreading. The Snapdragon has 12 cores and 12 threads, meaning each core handles exactly one thread. This suggests the Snapdragon relies on physical core count rather than multithreading for parallel performance.
Cache architecture differs in both size and organization. The Ryzen 7 170 uses a per-core L1 of 64 KB and a per-core L2 of 512 KB, with a shared 16 MB L3. The Snapdragon uses a per-core L1 of 288 KB, which is significantly larger, and a per-module L2 of 12 MB, with a smaller shared 6 MB L3. The larger L1 cache on the Snapdragon may benefit single-thread workloads, while the Ryzen 7 170's larger L3 cache could help with multi-threaded shared data.
Memory architecture also differs. The Ryzen 7 170 supports DDR5 with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and ECC memory. The Snapdragon supports LPDDR5X with a bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s and no ECC support. The higher bandwidth on the Snapdragon indicates a design aimed at memory-intensive tasks, while the Ryzen 7 170's ECC support targets reliability-sensitive applications.
The integrated graphics units are distinct: Radeon 680M on the Ryzen 7 170 and Adreno X1-85 on the Snapdragon. The PCIe configuration differs, with the Ryzen 7 170 offering 20 Gen 4 lanes versus 12 Gen 4 lanes on the Snapdragon, which affects expandability and data transfer capacity. The release dates place the Snapdragon about 17 months earlier than the Ryzen 7 170, reflecting different market timing. Both processors have a locked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported according to the database.