AMD Ryzen 7 170 vs Intel Core i7-14701E Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 170 and Intel Core i7-14701E are both 8-core, 16-thread processors, but the recorded benchmark data shows two very different performance profiles. The Intel part dominates the majority of the head-to-head tests, winning 10 of the 11 comparisons, while the AMD processor secures a single, but notable, victory. The data shows a clear split between raw computational throughput and specific cryptographic workloads, which forms the basis of this analysis.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most significant disparity appears in the PassMark physics test. The Intel Core i7-14701E scores 2399, which is 62.9% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 170's score of 890. This is the largest percentage gap in the entire comparison, indicating a substantial advantage in a workload that often scales with core frequency and architecture efficiency.

Similarly, the prime number finding test shows a massive divergence. The Intel processor produces a score of 176, while the AMD chip only manages 49, resulting in a 72.2% deficit for the Ryzen part. This workload is highly sensitive to single-core performance and clock speed, where the Intel part's data shows a clear edge.

In floating-point math, the Intel Core i7-14701E again leads decisively. Its score of 61873 is 27.3% higher than the Ryzen 7 170's 44979. This advantage is mirrored in single-threaded performance, where the Intel processor scores 4305 compared to 3128, a 27.3% difference in both the `passmark_single_thread` and `passmark_singlethread` metrics. The consistency of these two figures confirms the Intel part's superior per-core capability.

The multi-threaded test reinforces this trend. The Intel Core i7-14701E delivers a score of 26112, which is 20.5% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 170's 20760. This is notable because both processors have the same core and thread count, meaning the performance gap is not due to a difference in parallelism but rather to the efficiency and speed of each individual core.

The Intel part also leads in the remaining computational tests, though by smaller margins. In integer math, it scores 81325 against 79738, a 2% lead. In data compression, the Intel processor scores 282939 versus 265920, a 6% advantage. Random string sorting shows a 4.6% gap, with scores of 29158 and 27804 respectively. The extended instructions test shows a narrower margin, with Intel leading 18528 to 18107, a 2.3% difference.

The AMD Ryzen 7 170's only victory comes in data encryption. It scores 16078, which is 8.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-14701E's 14862. This suggests that the AMD processor's architecture, which is based on the Zen 3+ design, has a specific strength in handling encryption algorithms that the Intel Raptor Lake architecture does not match.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the Intel Core i7-14701E is the superior processor for general-purpose and high-intensity computing tasks. Its wins in physics, prime number finding, floating-point math, and multi-threaded workloads indicate that it is better suited for applications that demand high clock speeds and efficient instruction execution. The 27.3% lead in single-thread score is particularly significant, as it suggests better responsiveness in everyday applications and games that rely on fewer, faster cores.

The AMD Ryzen 7 170, however, has a clear niche. Its 8.2% advantage in data encryption shows that for workloads involving cryptographic operations, it can outperform the Intel part. This could be relevant for specific server or security-focused applications. Additionally, the AMD processor has a 35 TDP rating, which is lower than the Intel part's 65 TDP, indicating it may be a more power-efficient choice for systems where thermal output is a primary concern.

Users who prioritize maximum compute performance, especially in heavily threaded applications like video rendering or scientific simulations, should look toward the Intel Core i7-14701E. Those who require strong encryption performance or have strict power consumption limits should consider the AMD Ryzen 7 170.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectural designs. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i7-14701E, in contrast, uses the Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-R, and is built on Intel's 10 nm process. The die size also differs, with the AMD chip measuring 210 mm² and the Intel chip measuring 257 mm².

Cache configurations show a significant difference. The AMD processor features 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, with 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and a much larger 2 MB of L2 cache per core, along with 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This larger cache allocation on the Intel side likely contributes to its higher performance in cache-sensitive workloads.

The integrated graphics also differ. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 includes a Radeon 680M, while the Intel Core i7-14701E includes UHD Graphics 770. Both processors support ECC memory, but their platform capabilities diverge elsewhere. The AMD part uses the AMD Socket FP7 and supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The Intel part uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which offers a newer interconnect standard.

Specification Differences

The most direct comparison shows both processors have 8 cores and 16 threads. The base clock speeds differ, with the AMD Ryzen 7 170 running at 3.20 GHz and the Intel Core i7-14701E at 2.60 GHz. However, the boost clock tells a different story, with the Intel part reaching 5.40 GHz compared to the AMD part's 4.75 GHz. This higher boost clock explains the Intel part's advantage in single-threaded tests.

Memory support is another point of divergence. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 supports only DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel Core i7-14701E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also in a dual-channel configuration, though its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database.

The market segment and release dates also differ. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 is a mobile processor released in September 2025, while the Intel Core i7-14701E is a desktop processor released in June 2024. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both have different part numbers: 100-000000989 for AMD and Q49FSRNJK for Intel.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-threaded benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E scores 4305, which is 27.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 170's score of 3128.

Q: Is there any test where the AMD Ryzen 7 170 outperforms the Intel Core i7-14701E?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 170 wins the data encryption test, scoring 16078 compared to the Intel part's 14862, an 8.2% advantage.

Q: What is the difference in multi-threaded performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E scores 26112 in the multi-thread test, while the AMD Ryzen 7 170 scores 20760, giving the Intel processor a 20.5% lead.

Q: Do both processors have the same core and thread counts?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 7 170 and Intel Core i7-14701E have 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 7 170 has 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has a TDP of 35, and the Intel Core i7-14701E has a TDP of 65.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14701E is the clear choice for compute-heavy tasks that benefit from high clock speeds and large caches. Its wins in physics, floating-point math, and prime number finding indicate strength in scientific and engineering applications. The 20.5% lead in multi-threaded performance also makes it suitable for video encoding, 3D rendering, and other parallel workloads where every bit of throughput counts. The 33 MB L3 cache and higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz give it an edge in gaming and real-time applications that are sensitive to memory latency and single-core speed.

The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has a more specialized role. Its 8.2% win in data encryption points to a specific advantage in cryptographic tasks, such as VPN termination, secure file transfers, or database encryption. Its lower TDP of 35 also makes it a better fit for mobile or compact systems where heat dissipation and power draw are constrained. The mobile market segment and AMD Socket FP7 platform indicate it is designed for laptops, where its combination of Zen 3+ architecture and integrated Radeon 680M graphics might offer a balanced feature set for portable devices.