AMD Ryzen 7 170 vs Intel Core 9 273PTE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data reveals a clear split between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 wins 3 of the 11 shared benchmark tests, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE wins 8. The most decisive AMD victory comes in passmark_extended_instructions, where the Ryzen 7 170 scores 18107 against Intel's 15952, a 13.5% advantage. The AMD part also leads in passmark_data_encryption with 16078 versus 14253, a 12.8% gap, and edges out the Intel chip in passmark_data_compression, 265920 to 258704, a narrower 2.8% margin.

The Intel Core 9 273PTE counters with several larger wins. Its most dramatic advantage is in passmark_find_prime_numbers, where it scores 142 versus the AMD's 49, a 65.5% lead. The Intel part also dominates passmark_physics, scoring 1917 against 890, a 53.6% difference. In passmark_floating_point_math, Intel delivers 60673 versus 44979, a 25.9% advantage. The Intel chip leads passmark_multithread by 13.7% (24054 to 20760) and passmark_single_thread by 8.9% (3433 to 3128). Smaller Intel wins appear in passmark_integer_math (82411 vs 79738, 3.2%) and passmark_random_string_sorting (28973 vs 27804, 4%).

The average benchmark scores tell a different story from the head-to-head results. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 posts an average benchmark score of 43689, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE averages 31143. That discrepancy stems from the benchmark sets included in each processor's profile. The AMD part's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 at 43704 (0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 7 260 at 43717 (-0.1% delta). The Intel part's nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-12700F at 31081 (0.2% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS at 31074 (0.2% delta). These rival groups are not directly comparable because they draw from different test suites.

The head-to-head tests are the only place where both CPUs face identical workloads. There, the Intel part's overall edge is consistent but not universal. The AMD chip wins all three tests involving data compression, encryption, and extended instructions, which suggests a specialized strength in those areas. The Intel part wins every other category, including prime number finding, physics, floating point, integer math, multithreading, sorting, and single-thread performance.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 170 wins in workloads that stress data manipulation and instruction set extensions. Its 12.8% lead in data encryption and 13.5% lead in extended instructions indicate that cryptographic tasks and SIMD-heavy code run faster on the Zen 3+ architecture. The 2.8% advantage in data compression is smaller but still positive. These three wins cluster around tasks that frequently appear in database workloads, compression utilities, and security-related processing.

The Intel Core 9 273PTE wins in raw computational throughput. The 65.5% margin in prime number finding is the largest single gap in the dataset, pointing to a substantial advantage in integer-heavy algorithmic loops. The 53.6% lead in physics tests suggests stronger performance in simulation and collision-detection workloads. The 25.9% advantage in floating-point math indicates that scientific computing and 3D rendering tasks will favor the Intel part. The multithread score, which is 13.7% higher, shows that the Intel chip handles parallel workloads better overall, likely due to its higher core and thread counts.

Single-thread performance also belongs to Intel, with a 8.9% lead. That matters for lightly threaded applications like many legacy games and productivity tools. The Intel chip's smaller wins in integer math (3.2%) and random string sorting (4%) are less dramatic but still consistent. The Intel part does not lose any test that depends on general arithmetic or memory sorting.

The AMD part's wins are narrow in relative terms except for encryption and extended instructions. The Intel part's wins are often much larger. For users who prioritize encryption or compression, the AMD chip is the clear choice. For nearly everything else measured, the Intel chip delivers higher scores.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward conclusion. The Intel Core 9 273PTE wins the majority of head-to-head tests, including the multithread and single-thread flagship metrics. Its 13.7% multithread advantage and 8.9% single-thread advantage make it the stronger general-purpose processor in this comparison. The 65.5% lead in prime number finding and 53.6% lead in physics further reinforce that position.

The AMD Ryzen 7 170 is not without merit. Its wins in encryption, extended instructions, and data compression are meaningful for specific workloads. A user whose primary tasks involve encrypting data, compressing files, or running AVX-optimized code would see better results on the AMD part. The AMD chip also carries a much lower TDP (35 versus 45), which is a relevant factor for systems with limited cooling or battery constraints, although the database does not include direct power consumption measurements.

The Intel part belongs in the desktop segment with Socket 1700, while the AMD part is a mobile processor on Socket FP7. That distinction matters for system builders. The Intel chip's launch MSRP is $549. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. The Intel chip also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD part supports only DDR5. These platform differences are as important as the raw scores for anyone choosing between them.

For a desktop workstation where performance per watt is not the primary concern, the Intel Core 9 273PTE delivers higher scores in most categories. For a mobile system or a compact build that prioritizes encryption and compression throughput, the AMD Ryzen 7 170 offers a competitive alternative with its lower TDP and specialized strengths.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE scores 3433 in passmark_single_thread, compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 170's 3128, an 8.9% difference.

Q: How much faster is the AMD chip in encryption?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 170 scores 16078 in passmark_data_encryption, which is 12.8% higher than the Intel Core 9 273PTE's 14253.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gap is in passmark_find_prime_numbers, where the Intel Core 9 273PTE scores 142 versus the AMD's 49, a 65.5% lead for Intel.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 7 170 and the Intel Core 9 273PTE support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 170 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has an average benchmark score of 43689, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE averages 31143, though these figures come from different benchmark suites.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, produced on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The AMD part belongs to the Ryzen 7 generation, while the Intel part is designated as Core 9.

Cache structures differ substantially. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, with 36 MB of shared L3. The Intel part's larger L2 and L3 caches contribute to its higher scores in many tests, particularly those that benefit from larger working sets.

The AMD part integrates Radeon 680M graphics, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD chip supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, whereas the Intel chip supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The Intel part's newer PCIe generation offers higher bandwidth per lane, though the AMD part has more total lanes.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 supports dual-channel DDR5 only, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel Core 9 273PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with a higher recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part's broader memory compatibility gives system builders more flexibility, and its higher bandwidth figure suggests better memory throughput.

The production status for both is Active. The AMD part was released on 2025-09-30, and the Intel part on 2026-03-08. The AMD chip has a 35 TDP, while the Intel chip has a 45 TDP. Both have locked multipliers, meaning neither supports user overclocking via the multiplier.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification field. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks are 3.20 GHz for AMD and 1.40 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 4.75 GHz for AMD and 5.50 GHz for Intel. The Intel chip's higher boost clock partially compensates for its much lower base clock.

The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD chip's process node is 6 nm, and the Intel chip's is 10 nm. The AMD die size is 210 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Intel part. The AMD part has a part number of 100-000000989, and the Intel part has a part number of SA4QJ.

Market segments differ: the AMD Ryzen 7 170 is a Mobile processor, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE is a Desktop processor. The AMD chip supports DDR5 memory only, whereas the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bus width is dual-channel for both. The AMD part has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and the Intel part has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The integrated graphics differ as noted: Radeon 680M on AMD versus UHD Graphics 730 on Intel. The AMD part has a launch MSRP of null, while the Intel part has a launch MSRP of $549. The AMD chip's release date is 2025-09-30, and the Intel chip's is 2026-03-08. TDP values are 35 for AMD and 45 for Intel. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.