AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U and Intel Core 5 213PTE occupy different corners of the processor market, one built for efficient mobile systems and the other for desktop towers. The recorded data shows a clear split in workload dominance, with Intel taking the majority of benchmark wins while AMD holds specific strengths in encryption, extended instructions, and sorting tasks. The Intel part also posts a higher average benchmark score, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD chip sits in the 81st percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins 12 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons, establishing itself as the stronger option for raw compute throughput. Its most decisive victories come in prime number finding, where it leads by 50.3%, and physics calculations, where it is ahead by 47.5%. The Intel processor also takes every Cinebench test, both single-core and multi-core, with a consistent 8.1% advantage across all six versions of that benchmark suite.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U wins 5 comparisons, and its victories are concentrated in specific instruction-level workloads. The largest gap is in extended instructions, where AMD leads by 18.5%. Data encryption shows a 9.9% edge for AMD, and random string sorting goes to AMD by 6.7%. The single-thread PassMark result is essentially a tie, with AMD ahead by only 0.4%. These wins point to AMD's architecture handling certain cryptographic and string manipulation tasks more efficiently despite the overall performance deficit.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. AMD uses a 6-core, 12-thread configuration built on Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. Intel counters with an 8-core, 16-thread design based on the Bartlett Lake codename, produced on Intel's 10 nm process. The Intel part has no listed transistor count or die size in the database.

Cache layouts differ substantially. AMD provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Intel gives each core 80 KB of L1, 2 MB of L2, and 24 MB of shared L3. The larger per-core caches on Intel likely contribute to its lead in physics and prime number tests, which benefit from fast data reuse.

Memory support separates the two as well. AMD uses DDR5 only with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus with 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs, with AMD offering Gen 4 across 20 lanes while Intel provides Gen 5 across 16 lanes.

The platform targets diverge clearly. AMD is a mobile processor on Socket FP7 with a 28 W TDP, while Intel is a desktop part on Socket 1700 with a 45 W TDP. The integrated graphics also differ, with AMD using Radeon 760M and Intel using UHD Graphics 730. Both processors have locked multipliers, so neither supports unlocked overclocking.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results show a uniform pattern. Across R15, R20, and R23, both single-core and multi-core, Intel wins every test by 8.1%. The R23 multi-core scores show Intel at 21751 against AMD's 19982, a gap of 1769 points. Single-core R23 shows Intel at 3070 versus AMD's 2821. This consistency indicates a fundamental per-clock performance advantage for Intel in rendering workloads.

The PassMark suite reveals a more varied picture. Floating point math heavily favors Intel, with 71722 against AMD's 45265, a 36.9% lead. Integer math also goes to Intel at 93109 versus 74875, a 19.6% advantage. Multi-thread performance shows Intel ahead at 25590 versus 22795, a 10.9% gap. Physics testing nearly doubles AMD's score, with Intel at 2199 and AMD at 1154.

AMD's counterattacks come in specific areas. Extended instructions show AMD at 19130 versus Intel's 16146, a 18.5% win. Data encryption favors AMD at 15843 versus 14413, a 9.9% edge. Random string sorting goes to AMD at 32114 versus 30106, a 6.7% margin. The PassMark single-thread test shows AMD at 3732 and Intel at 3718, a razor-thin 0.4% difference that effectively makes them equal in that metric.

Prime number finding produces the largest single delta in the entire comparison. Intel scores 157 while AMD scores 78, giving Intel a 50.3% advantage. This extreme disparity suggests a significant architectural difference in how the two processors handle the specific instruction patterns used by that workload.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has an average benchmark score of 32924, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U has an average score of 30254, placing it in the 81st percentile.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U supports DDR5 only.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U has a TDP of 28 W. The Intel Core 5 213PTE has a TDP of 45 W.

Q: Which processor wins in data compression?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins by a narrow margin, scoring 261083 against AMD's 260925, a difference of 0.1%.

The Verdict

The Intel Core 5 213PTE is the clear choice for workloads that depend on sustained multi-threaded compute, floating point math, physics simulation, and prime number calculations. Its 8.1% lead across all Cinebench versions and its 50.3% advantage in prime number finding make it the stronger rendering and scientific computing processor. The 45 W TDP and desktop socket reflect its positioning as a full-power desktop part.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U suits tasks involving encryption, extended instruction sets, and random string sorting, where it leads by 9.9%, 18.5%, and 6.7% respectively. Its 28 W TDP and mobile socket indicate a design focused on power efficiency rather than peak throughput. For users running cryptographic workloads or applications that leverage specialized instruction extensions, the AMD part delivers measurable advantages despite its lower core count.

The data shows Intel winning 12 comparisons and AMD winning 5, with the overall average score favoring Intel by roughly 8.8%. The single-thread PassMark results are effectively identical, so neither processor has a meaningful edge in lightly threaded general tasks. The choice between them comes down to whether the workload favors Intel's raw compute power or AMD's efficiency and specialized instruction handling.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U | Intel Core 5 213PTE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.50 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2024-04-15 | 2026-03-08 |

| Launch MSRP | Not available | $221 |