AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Intel Core 5 211E Comparison

The benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U and the Intel Core 5 211E presents a clear split in performance characteristics. The Intel part wins the majority of the head-to-head tests, but the AMD chip secures decisive victories in specific workloads that reveal its architectural strengths. This analysis breaks down the recorded scores, the underlying design choices, and what the data means for each processor’s intended role.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 5 211E dominates the Cinebench suite, though by narrow margins. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 20389 against the AMD’s 19982, a 2% difference. The single-core result is similar: 2878 versus 2821, also a 2% edge for Intel. This pattern repeats across the entire Cinebench series. R20 multi-core shows 8563 for Intel and 8392 for AMD, while R15 multi-core records 2055 against 2014. The consistency of these small deltas suggests the Intel chip holds a slight per-core clock advantage in sustained rendering workloads.

The Passmark suite reveals larger gaps. The Intel processor’s most significant win is in floating point math, scoring 66402 against AMD’s 45265, a 31.8% advantage. Data compression shows a 24.8% lead for Intel (346757 versus 260925), and integer math favors Intel by 15% (88117 versus 74875). Extended instructions and data encryption follow the same trend, with Intel leading by 11.4% and 11.7% respectively. The multi-thread Passmark score gives Intel a 4.4% edge, and single-thread performance is 6.8% higher for Intel (4006 versus 3732).

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U wins two tests, and both are substantial. In find prime numbers, AMD scores 78 against Intel’s 43, a massive 81.4% advantage. The physics test also goes to AMD with 1154 versus 702, a 64.4% lead. These two results indicate a fundamental difference in how the processors handle specific instruction patterns, likely tied to their core architectures rather than raw clock speeds.

The overall benchmark average confirms Intel’s lead. The Intel Core 5 211E records an average score of 37829, while the AMD chip sits at 30254. The Intel processor places in the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database, compared to AMD’s 81st percentile. The nearest rival data for Intel includes the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at a 0.2% lower score, and the Intel Core i9-14901E at 0.2% higher, placing the Core 5 211E in a tightly contested performance tier.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U uses the Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with the Hawk Point codename. It integrates 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The cache layout is 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. This is a mobile-focused design with a 28 W TDP, using the AMD Socket FP7.

The Intel Core 5 211E is a desktop part based on the Bartlett Lake codename, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It packs 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The cache hierarchy is different: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. The TDP is 65 W, nearly double AMD’s figure, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700. The die size is 257 mm² versus AMD’s 178 mm², though the transistor count is not recorded for Intel.

Memory support differs significantly. The AMD part supports DDR5 only, with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but with a lower recorded bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity also diverges: AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The integrated graphics are Radeon 760M for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel, with no comparative performance data in the records.

The release dates are distinct, with AMD launching in April 2024 and Intel in January 2025. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $221, while AMD’s launch price is not listed in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U wins in prime number finding and physics simulation, according to the Passmark results. The 81.4% lead in prime numbers and the 64.4% lead in physics point to efficiency in integer-heavy, branch-predictable workloads. These are common in certain scientific calculations and legacy single-threaded applications. The lower TDP of 28 W also suggests it can sustain these workloads in thermally constrained environments, though the database does not include power efficiency measurements.

The Intel Core 5 211E wins in nearly every other measured category. Floating point math shows its largest margin at 31.8%, which is relevant for financial modeling, engineering simulations, and any workload that relies heavily on vectorized math. Data compression at 24.8% ahead indicates strong performance for archive handling and database operations. The multi-thread score of 23833 versus 22795 confirms Intel’s edge in heavily parallel tasks, even with a lower boost clock, likely due to its additional 4 cores. The single-thread score of 4006 versus 3732 gives Intel the lead in responsive, lightly-threaded applications as well.

The Cinebench results, where Intel wins every test by 2%, show that in pure rendering throughput, the two processors are closely matched, with Intel holding a slight but consistent advantage. The AMD chip’s wins are narrower in scope but much larger in magnitude, suggesting specialized strengths rather than general-purpose superiority.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E records higher multi-core scores across all Cinebench versions. In Cinebench R23, it scores 20389 versus the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U’s 19982, and in Passmark multi-thread, it scores 23833 versus 22795.

Q: How large is the AMD processor’s win in the prime numbers test?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U scores 78 in Passmark find prime numbers, while the Intel Core 5 211E scores 43. This gives AMD an 81.4% advantage, the largest margin in any recorded benchmark between these two processors.

Q: Does the Intel processor support DDR4 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 5 211E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U supports only DDR5.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U has a 28 W TDP, while the Intel Core 5 211E has a 65 W TDP. The Intel part is a desktop processor, and the AMD part is a mobile processor.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has an average benchmark score of 37829, placing it in the 86th percentile. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U has an average score of 30254, placing it in the 81st percentile.

Specification Differences

The recorded specifications show clear distinctions. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core 5 211E uses Intel’s 10 nm process. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel chip has 10 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks differ: 3.50 GHz for AMD versus 2.70 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are identical at 4.90 GHz. TDP is 28 W for AMD and 65 W for Intel.

Cache configurations vary. AMD uses 64 KB L1 per core and 1 MB L2 per core, with 16 MB shared L3. Intel uses 80 KB L1 per core and 2 MB L2 per core, with 20 MB shared L3. Memory support favors Intel’s flexibility with DDR4 and DDR5, though AMD’s DDR5 bandwidth is higher at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. PCIe generation differs, with AMD on Gen 4 and Intel on Gen 5, though Intel has fewer lanes at 16 versus AMD’s 20. The Intel processor has a recorded launch MSRP of $221. The release dates are April 2024 for AMD and January 2025 for Intel.

The Verdict

The data points to the Intel Core 5 211E as the stronger general-purpose processor. It wins 15 of the 17 recorded head-to-head benchmarks, holds a higher average score, and ranks higher in the database percentile. Its wins in floating point math, data compression, and integer math are substantial, and its Cinebench results show a consistent, if small, advantage across all rendering tests. The additional 4 cores and 16 MB of L3 cache likely contribute to its multi-threaded performance, and the higher single-thread score confirms its capability in lightly-threaded tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U is not without merit. Its wins in prime numbers and physics are decisive, and its 28 W TDP makes it suitable for mobile platforms where power draw is a constraint. The database does not include power efficiency benchmarks, but the TDP figure alone indicates a very different design target. For workloads that align with its strengths, such as certain integer-heavy calculations or physics simulations, the AMD chip delivers exceptional performance per its recorded scores.

The choice depends on the use case. For desktop systems requiring broad performance across rendering, math, and compression tasks, the Intel Core 5 211E is the clear pick based on the data. For mobile deployments or specialized integer workloads, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U offers specific advantages that the Intel processor cannot match. The benchmark records show two capable processors, with Intel holding the overall edge and AMD excelling in niche areas.