AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U

CORE STATE Hawk Point
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.2 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 213PTE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,557
2,192
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
219
309
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
6,491
9,135
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
916
1,289
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
15,456
21,751
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,182
3,070
passmark_data_compression
205,703
261,083
passmark_data_encryption
12,319
14,413
passmark_extended_instructions
15,410
16,146
passmark_find_prime_numbers
66
157
passmark_floating_point_math
34,865
71,722
passmark_integer_math
56,738
93,109
passmark_multithread
18,218
25,590
passmark_physics
983
2,199
passmark_random_string_sorting
24,797
30,106
passmark_single_thread
3,563
3,718
passmark_singlethread
3,563
3,718

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U vs Intel Core 5 213PTE

# AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U vs Intel Core 5 213PTE

The recorded data shows a clear performance hierarchy between these two processors. The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins all 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons against the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U, with margins ranging from 4.2% to 58% depending on the workload. The AMD part holds a 76th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 83rd percentile, and the average benchmark score difference is substantial: 32924 for Intel versus 23709 for AMD.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE dominates every measured workload category in the database. There are no benchmark wins recorded for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U in the head-to-head comparison. The Intel processor's largest advantages appear in compute-heavy tasks that scale with core count and raw execution throughput. For single-threaded performance, the Intel part leads by 4.2% in PassMark single-thread tests and by 28.9% in Cinebench R23 single-core, indicating a significant per-thread advantage.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel processor extends its lead further. Cinebench R23 multicore shows the Intel part scoring 21751 against the AMD's 15456, a 28.9% advantage. PassMark multithread results follow a similar pattern: 25590 versus 18218, a 28.8% gap. The Intel processor also leads decisively in floating-point math (71722 versus 34865, a 51.4% margin) and integer math (93109 versus 56738, a 39.1% margin). Physics calculations show a 55.3% gap, and prime number finding shows the largest disparity at 58%.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U is not without competitive traits, but the data places it behind in every recorded metric. Its closest margins against the Intel part appear in PassMark extended instructions (4.6% behind) and single-thread performance (4.2% behind). The AMD processor's strongest absolute scores are in PassMark integer math, floating-point math, and data compression, but each of those still trails the Intel competitor by large margins.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U uses the Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm process node manufactured by TSMC, with the Hawk Point codename. It belongs to the 8000 series and the Ryzen 5 generation. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename on a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel, belonging to the Core 5 generation.

Core and thread counts differ: the AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 8 cores and 16 threads. Clock speeds also differ substantially. The AMD processor has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Intel processor has a lower base clock of 2.10 GHz but a higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The thermal design power reflects this: the AMD part is rated at 28 watts, while the Intel part is rated at 45 watts.

Cache hierarchies are configured differently. The AMD part provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. These cache allocations align with the Intel processor's higher core count and generally larger per-core resources.

Memory support differs in scope. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, while the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The AMD part has a higher recorded memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part records 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics also differ. The AMD processor includes Radeon 740M graphics, while the Intel processor includes UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7, and the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor's production status is active, and the Intel processor's production status is also active.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite shows consistent Intel advantages across all versions. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 2192 against the AMD's 1557, a 29% gap. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Intel part scores 309 against 219, a 29.1% gap. Cinebench R20 multicore shows 9135 versus 6491, a 28.9% gap, and Cinebench R20 single-core shows 1289 versus 916, also a 28.9% gap. Cinebench R23 multicore records 21751 versus 15456, a 28.9% gap, and Cinebench R23 single-core records 3070 versus 2182, again a 28.9% gap. The consistency of these margins suggests the Intel processor holds a stable advantage across rendering workloads of varying lengths and thread counts.

PassMark results show a wider spread of margins. Data compression favors the Intel part at 261083 versus 205703, a 21.2% gap. Data encryption shows a narrower 14.5% gap (14413 versus 12319). Extended instructions show the smallest recorded difference: 16146 versus 15410, a 4.6% gap. Prime number finding shows the largest gap in the entire comparison: 157 versus 66, a 58% difference. Floating-point math shows 71722 versus 34865, a 51.4% gap, and integer math shows 93109 versus 56738, a 39.1% gap.

The PassMark multithread test records 25590 for the Intel part and 18218 for the AMD part, a 28.8% gap. Physics calculations show 2199 versus 983, a 55.3% gap. Random string sorting shows 30106 versus 24797, a 17.6% gap. Single-thread PassMark results show 3718 versus 3563, a 4.2% gap. The pattern is clear: the Intel processor leads in every test, with the smallest margins in single-thread and extended-instruction workloads and the largest margins in prime number finding, physics, and floating-point math.

The Verdict

The data directs a straightforward conclusion: the Intel Core 5 213PTE outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U across every recorded benchmark. The Intel processor's 8 cores and 16 threads provide a structural advantage over the AMD part's 6 cores and 12 threads, and its higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz exceeds the AMD part's 4.90 GHz. The Intel processor also reaches the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, compared to the AMD part's 76th percentile.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U remains a viable processor for its intended segment, but the data does not place it ahead of the Intel Core 5 213PTE in any measured category. Its advantages are limited to platform characteristics: a smaller process node (4 nm versus 10 nm), higher memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s), and a lower thermal design power (28 watts versus 45 watts). These traits favor efficiency-oriented mobile designs, while the Intel processor targets desktop use with higher performance ceilings.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE should be the choice for workloads that prioritize raw computational throughput, particularly multi-threaded rendering, floating-point math, and physics simulations. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U may be preferable in scenarios where power consumption matters more than peak performance, but the benchmark data does not show any performance scenario where it wins.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest gap is in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where the Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 157 versus the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U's 66, a 58% difference.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U's boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U and the Intel Core 5 213PTE support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U uses PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What are the integrated graphics options?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U includes Radeon 740M graphics, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE includes UHD Graphics 730.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename with no listed architecture. The AMD part is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process by Intel. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 3.20 GHz for AMD and 2.10 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 4.90 GHz for AMD and 5.20 GHz for Intel. Thermal design power is 28 watts for AMD and 45 watts for Intel.

Cache configurations differ: the AMD part has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The Intel part has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support differs: the AMD part supports DDR5 only, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD and 76.8 GB/s for Intel. PCIe support differs: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes, while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 740M for AMD, UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. Sockets differ: AMD Socket FP7 for AMD, Intel Socket 1700 for Intel. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221; the AMD part has no listed launch MSRP. The Intel part has a release date of March 2026, while the AMD part has a release date of April 2024.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 PRO 8540U
5 213PTE
Core Specs
Cores
6
8 +33.3%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.2
2.1 -34.4%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.9
5.2 +6.1%
Frequency (GHz)
3.2
2.1 -34.4%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.9
5.2 +6.1%
Multiplier
32
21 -34.4%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
45 +60.7%
PL1
—
45 W
PL2
—
219 W
Configurable TDP
15-30 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
—
Codename
Hawk Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
20,900 million
—
Die Size
137 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP7
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
—
E-Core Frequency
3 GHz up to 3.5 GHz
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 740M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$221
Part Number
100-000001329(FP7r2),100-000001331(FP7)
SA4QM
Package
FP7, FP7r2
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U Details View Core 5 213PTE Details