AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE vs Intel Core 9 273PQE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a decisive performance landscape: the Intel Core 9 273PQE wins all 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE records zero wins. The scale of the Intel advantage varies significantly across workload types, ranging from a moderate 29.1% lead in single-threaded tests to a commanding 76.5% margin in physics simulation.

Starting with single-core performance, the Intel part scores 5532 in Cinebench R23 single-core versus 2188 for the AMD processor, a 60.4% deficit for the Ryzen. The PassMark single-thread test shows a narrower gap: Intel scores 4573 against AMD's 3240, a 29.1% difference. This smaller margin in PassMark suggests the AMD architecture remains competitive in certain single-threaded operations, though the Cinebench results indicate Intel holds a substantial advantage in rendering-oriented single-core tasks.

Multicore workloads amplify the Intel lead. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 39190 against AMD's 15504, a 60.4% margin. The Cinebench R20 multi-core test shows a similar pattern: 16459 versus 6511, a 60.4% difference. PassMark's multithread benchmark records 46107 for Intel and 18057 for AMD, a 60.8% gap. These consistent margins across different Cinebench versions indicate the Intel processor's additional cores translate directly into proportional rendering performance gains.

The largest deltas appear in specialized compute tasks. PassMark physics shows Intel at 2754 versus AMD's 648, a 76.5% deficit for AMD. Prime number finding records 198 for Intel against 49 for AMD, a 75.3% gap. Floating-point math delivers 125546 versus 38204, a 69.6% margin. These results suggest the Intel processor's wider execution resources and higher clock ceiling provide outsized benefits in mathematically intensive workloads.

Data-oriented tasks show more moderate but still significant gaps. Data compression scores 585752 for Intel versus 228037 for AMD, a 61.1% difference. Random string sorting records 53167 against 23769, a 55.3% margin. Data encryption shows the smallest multi-core gap at 51% (29636 versus 14509). Extended instructions testing produces 38743 versus 15714, a 59.4% margin. Integer math completes the set at 164629 versus 67582, a 58.9% difference.

The average benchmark score confirms the overall hierarchy: Intel averages 66099 across all tests, while AMD averages 25880. This places the Intel processor at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs in the database, versus the 78th percentile for AMD. The nearest rivals for Intel include the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D with a 0.3% difference, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus at -1.1%, indicating the Core 9 273PQE sits firmly in high-end desktop territory. For AMD, the closest competitors include the Intel Core i7-11700K at 0.3% and the AMD Ryzen 5 230 at 0.4%, positioning the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE as a mainstream mid-range part.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent different design philosophies and manufacturing approaches. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE uses the Zen 3 architecture on TSMC's 7 nm process, codenamed Cezanne, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE uses Intel's 10 nm process with the Bartlett Lake codename. The Intel part operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boosts to 5.90 GHz, while AMD matches the 3.40 GHz base clock but reaches only 4.40 GHz boost. This 1.50 GHz boost advantage for Intel is substantial and explains much of the single-thread performance lead.

Core configuration differs sharply: AMD provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while Intel doubles that to 12 cores and 24 threads. Cache hierarchies also diverge. AMD uses 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Intel employs 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. The larger per-core caches and tripled L3 capacity give Intel more on-die data capacity for working sets.

Memory support shows a generational split. AMD supports only DDR4 with dual-channel access and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. This 75% bandwidth advantage for Intel benefits memory-intensive workloads. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs substantially. AMD provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes, while Intel offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The newer PCIe generation provides four times the per-lane bandwidth, which matters for high-throughput peripherals and storage.

Integrated graphics also differ: AMD includes Radeon Vega 7, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. Neither is a discrete-class solution, but the specific capabilities vary. The Intel processor carries a launch MSRP of $589, while AMD's launch MSRP is not recorded in the database.

Transistor count and die size are only listed for AMD: 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. Intel's figures are not recorded. Both processors are locked (multiplier not unlocked), and both are actively in production. AMD released on 2024-05-06, while Intel's release date is 2026-03-08, a significant time gap that helps explain the architectural differences.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE boosts to 5.90 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE reaches 4.40 GHz, a 1.50 GHz difference.

Q: How does memory bandwidth compare between the two?

A: Intel supports 89.6 GB/s with DDR4 or DDR5, while AMD provides 51.2 GB/s with DDR4 only. Intel's bandwidth is 75% higher.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: Intel has 12 cores and 24 threads, while AMD has 6 cores and 12 threads, giving Intel double the core count.

Q: What is the largest benchmark performance gap?

A: The PassMark physics test shows the biggest delta at 76.5%, with Intel scoring 2754 versus AMD's 648.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE and Intel Core 9 273PQE support ECC memory.

Q: What PCIe generation does each processor use?

A: Intel uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while AMD uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE | Intel Core 9 273PQE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 12 |

| Threads | 12 | 24 |

| Boost clock | 4.40 GHz | 5.90 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 125 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process node | 7 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| L1 cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 512 KB per core | 2 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 16 MB | 36 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon Vega 7 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Release date | 2024-05-06 | 2026-03-08 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $589 |

The TDP difference is notable: Intel draws 125 W versus AMD's 65 W. This explains part of the performance advantage but also indicates higher power consumption. The socket difference means no upgrade path compatibility between the two platforms. AMD's smaller process node (7 nm versus 10 nm) provides a transistor density advantage per die area, though Intel's larger core count compensates with more total compute resources.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PQE wins every recorded benchmark, so the use-case split is primarily about workload intensity rather than task category. For heavily parallel workloads such as video rendering, scientific computation, and software compilation, the Intel processor's 12 cores and 24 threads deliver roughly 60% higher throughput in Cinebench tests and similar margins in PassMark multithread testing. The floating-point math result (125546 versus 38204) shows particular strength for numerical simulation tasks.

Data compression and encryption tasks favor Intel substantially, with 61.1% and 51% margins respectively. These workloads benefit from the larger L3 cache (36 MB versus 16 MB) and higher memory bandwidth. Random string sorting, a memory-access-heavy task, shows a 55.3% advantage for Intel, consistent with its bandwidth advantage.

Single-threaded responsiveness also favors Intel, though the margin varies by test. The PassMark single-thread result (4573 versus 3240) indicates a 29.1% lead, which is the smallest gap recorded. This suggests that for light, single-threaded daily tasks, the AMD processor is relatively closer in performance, though still behind.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE offers no benchmark wins in the recorded data. Its strengths lie outside the measured metrics: a lower 65 W TDP for reduced power draw, a smaller 7 nm process for potentially better efficiency per watt, and PCIe Gen 3 which is sufficient for many standard peripherals. For workloads that are latency-tolerant and lightly threaded, the AMD part's 29.1% single-thread deficit in PassMark is less impactful than the 60%+ margins in multi-core tests.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear hierarchy. The Intel Core 9 273PQE outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE across 100% of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks, with margins ranging from 29.1% to 76.5%. The average benchmark score of 66099 versus 25880 places Intel at the 93rd percentile versus AMD's 78th percentile. The Intel processor's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D at 0.3% difference, confirming its position among high-end desktop parts.

For users selecting between these two, the choice depends on workload priority. The Intel Core 9 273PQE is appropriate for multi-threaded rendering, data processing, and compute-heavy tasks where the 60%+ margins in Cinebench and PassMark multithread tests translate directly into reduced completion times. Its support for DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5 provides future-proofing for memory and storage upgrades.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE serves scenarios where the 65 W TDP and smaller process node matter more than raw throughput. Its 78th percentile ranking still places it above most CPUs in the database, and the 29.1% single-thread gap in PassMark means everyday responsiveness remains acceptable. For users with existing AM4 platforms or those prioritizing lower power draw, the AMD part offers a functional mid-range option, though the performance data cannot justify choosing it over the Intel processor on speed alone.