AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE and the Intel Core 7 350 are two processors with fundamentally different design goals, reflected clearly in their benchmark profiles. The data shows a decisive split: the AMD part dominates multi-threaded and memory-heavy workloads, while the Intel part counters with wins in specific math and physics tests. With 11 wins for the AMD and 6 for the Intel across the head-to-head benchmark suite, the overall average benchmark score of 25880 for the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE versus 17779 for the Core 7 350 encapsulates this divide.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE is the clear winner in almost every multi-threaded scenario. Its 12 threads provide a significant advantage over the Intel Core 7 350’s 6 threads. This is most apparent in the Cinebench suite, where the AMD chip wins R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests. The gap widens with newer benchmarks, reaching a 93.1% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core. The AMD processor also excels in data handling tasks, winning PassMark data compression, data encryption, and random string sorting by substantial margins. Integer math is another stronghold, with the AMD part scoring 100.3% higher than the Intel chip. The single-core Cinebench R20 and R23 results also favor AMD, showing that its advantage is not solely dependent on thread count.

The Intel Core 7 350 wins in a different set of tasks. It takes the Cinebench R15 single-core test by 24.7%, a notable reversal of the R20 and R23 single-core results. Its most dominant wins are in PassMark find prime numbers, where it leads by 54.2%, and PassMark physics, where it leads by 44.8%. It also wins PassMark floating point math by 10.8% and the PassMark single-thread test by 21%. These wins suggest a processor with a different strength profile, one that favors specific instruction-level performance and raw single-thread speed in certain legacy or specialized workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturing philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE uses the Zen 3 architecture on a 7 nm process from TSMC, codenamed Cezanne. It is a desktop part with a 65 W TDP and is built for the AMD Socket AM4. The Intel Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake codename on Intel’s 3 nm process and is a mobile part with a 15 W TDP, soldered to the Intel BGA 1516 socket. This difference in power envelope and market segment explains why the Intel chip is found in mobile systems while the AMD chip is a desktop offering.

The cache hierarchies are also distinct. The AMD processor uses 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 16 MB L3 cache. The Intel processor uses a much larger 192 KB of L1 per core and 2.5 MB of L2 per core, but only a 6 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel part also has fewer total threads, with 6 threads compared to the AMD’s 12. The AMD chip supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while the Intel chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a single-channel configuration with a higher bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The AMD processor supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the Intel part.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench multi-core results show the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE with a commanding lead. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD scores 1562 against the Intel’s 1220, a 28% advantage. The R20 multi-core test shows a similar pattern, with the AMD at 6511 and the Intel at 5373, a 21.2% lead. The most extreme difference is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the AMD scores 15504 and the Intel scores 8030, a 93.1% delta. This dramatic scaling suggests the AMD’s 12 threads are far more effective in this workload than the Intel’s 6.

The single-core results are more nuanced. The Intel Core 7 350 wins Cinebench R15 single-core with a score of 292 versus the AMD’s 220, a 24.7% margin. However, in Cinebench R20 single-core, the AMD wins with 918 versus 758, a 21.1% lead. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the AMD again wins, scoring 2188 versus 2046, a 6.9% advantage. This inconsistency across Cinebench versions is curious. It suggests that the Intel chip’s 4.80 GHz boost clock gives it an edge in the older R15 test, but the AMD’s longer-term performance scaling in newer R20 and R23 tests overcomes that clock advantage.

The PassMark suite provides further insight. The AMD wins data compression with a score of 228037 versus 143123, a 59.3% lead. It also wins data encryption with 14509 versus 10933, a 32.7% margin. Extended instructions go to AMD as well, with 15714 versus 12045, a 30.5% lead. Integer math is the AMD’s largest PassMark win, scoring 67582 against the Intel’s 33734, a 100.3% delta. The AMD also wins random string sorting with 23769 versus 17238, a 37.9% lead, and the PassMark multithread test with 18057 versus 15170, a 19% margin.

The Intel Core 7 350 takes the remaining PassMark tests. Find prime numbers goes to Intel with 107 versus 49, a 54.2% lead. Floating point math goes to Intel with 42809 versus 38204, a 10.8% lead. Physics also goes to Intel with 1173 versus 648, a 44.8% lead. The PassMark single-thread test is won by Intel with 4100 versus 3240, a 21% margin. These results paint a picture of an Intel processor that is strong in specific compute patterns, particularly those involving prime number generation and physics simulations, but weaker in memory-throughput-oriented tasks like compression and sorting.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are a major differentiator. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The clock speeds also differ: the AMD has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, while the Intel has a much lower base clock of 1.50 GHz but a higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The power envelopes are vastly different, with the AMD rated at 65 W and the Intel at 15 W.

Memory support is another key difference. The AMD uses DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration, while the Intel uses DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a single-channel configuration. The memory bandwidth figures are 51.2 GB/s for the AMD and 59.7 GB/s for the Intel. The AMD supports ECC memory, the Intel does not. The integrated graphics differ as well, with the AMD using Radeon Vega 7 and the Intel using Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The process nodes are 7 nm for the AMD and 3 nm for the Intel.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has better multi-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE. It wins all three Cinebench multi-core tests, with a 93.1% lead in R23, and also wins the PassMark multithread test by 19%.

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 350 have any advantages in single-core tests?

A: Yes, the Intel wins the Cinebench R15 single-core test by 24.7% and the PassMark single-thread test by 21%. However, the AMD wins the Cinebench R20 and R23 single-core tests.

Q: What is the difference in thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE has 12 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 350 does not.

Q: What memory types do they support?

A: The AMD supports DDR4, while the Intel supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE has a TDP of 65 W, while the Intel Core 7 350 has a TDP of 15 W.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE is the stronger processor for multi-threaded and general productivity tasks. Its 12 threads deliver significantly higher scores in Cinebench multi-core, data compression, encryption, and integer math. The Intel Core 7 350, with its 6 threads and lower TDP, is better suited for specific single-threaded workloads, as shown by its wins in PassMark physics, find prime numbers, and the Cinebench R15 single-core test. The Intel part also has a higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz and a more advanced 3 nm process node, but this does not translate into overall benchmark dominance. The AMD’s average benchmark score of 25880 places it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel’s score of 17779 places it in the 71st percentile. For users prioritizing multi-core throughput and memory-heavy tasks, the AMD is the clear choice. For specialized single-thread compute or low-power mobile applications, the Intel offers its own set of advantages.