AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G vs Intel Core i9-14901TE Comparison

AMD’s Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G and Intel’s Core i9-14901TE represent two contrasting approaches to the professional desktop CPU. The AMD part is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 design built on a 7 nm process, while the Intel chip is an 8-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part on a 10 nm process. The database contains a complete benchmark suite for the AMD processor, but the Intel processor currently has no recorded benchmark scores, which shapes the entire comparison.

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, giving it a 2-core and 4-thread advantage on paper.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE boosts to 5.50 GHz, which is substantially higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G’s 4.40 GHz boost clock. The AMD chip has a higher base clock at 3.90 GHz compared to Intel’s 2.30 GHz.

Q: What are the thermal design power (TDP) ratings for these CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G has a TDP of 65 watts. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has a lower TDP of 45 watts.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe connectivity?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G is limited to PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G and the Intel Core i9-14901TE support ECC memory, a key feature for workstation and server reliability.

Q: What is the Intel processor’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE sits at the 50th percentile, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G ranks at the 80th percentile. However, the Intel chip’s lower percentile is based on a lack of recorded benchmark data, not necessarily lower performance.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their underlying design. AMD uses the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. Intel counters with the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s own fabs. These process nodes directly influence transistor density and power characteristics.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. The AMD chip provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 16 MB shared L3 cache. Intel’s design offers 80 KB of L1 per core, a much larger 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 36 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel processor carries more than double the L3 cache, which can benefit workloads with large working sets.

The die sizes reflect the different designs: AMD’s Cezanne die measures 180 mm² with 10,700 million transistors, while Intel’s Raptor Lake-R die is larger at 257 mm². The transistor count for the Intel part is not recorded in the database. Both processors use dual-channel memory controllers, but AMD only supports DDR4 while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving the Intel chip access to newer memory technology.

Integrated graphics also differ. AMD equips the 5655G with Radeon Vega 7 graphics, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. Both processors are locked (multiplier not unlocked) and target the desktop market segment. The AMD chip fits the AMD Socket AM4 platform, whereas Intel uses Socket 1700.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two processors, and the Intel Core i9-14901TE has an empty benchmark array. This absence of measured data means a direct numerical comparison is impossible for Cinebench, PassMark, or any other recorded workload. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G does have a full set of scores: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 17249, single-core at 2435, Cinebench R20 multi-core at 7244, single-core at 1022, and Cinebench R15 multi-core at 1738, single-core at 245. PassMark results include multi-thread at 19129, single-thread at 3241, integer math at 67561, floating point math at 38649, data encryption at 15253, data compression at 255608, extended instructions at 17944, find prime numbers at 49, physics at 686, and random string sorting at 25253.

The Intel processor’s lack of recorded scores forces a qualitative assessment. The Intel chip’s 8-core, 16-thread configuration and 5.50 GHz boost clock suggest it could outperform the AMD part in multi-threaded scenarios, but this cannot be confirmed from the database. The AMD processor’s recorded scores establish a baseline, but without Intel data, the wins column remains empty for both sides. The database lists winsA as 0 and winsB as 0, reflecting the absence of comparative results.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G | Intel Core i9-14901TE |

|---------------|----------------------|------------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.90 GHz | 2.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.40 GHz | 5.50 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 45 W |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 180 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Transistors | 10,700 million | Not recorded |

| Release Date | 2024-05-06 | 2024-06-30 |

| Part Number | 100-000001513 | Q49CSRNJJ |

The Intel part uses a newer PCIe generation, supports DDR5, offers a lower TDP, and has a larger cache pool. The AMD part counters with a smaller die, higher base clock, and a more advanced process node.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear imbalance in available measurements. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G has a substantial benchmark presence with an average benchmark score of 28032 and an 80th percentile ranking. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (average score 28054, delta -0.1%), Intel Core i9-12900H (average score 28003, delta 0.1%), Intel Core i5-14500T (average score 28065, delta -0.1%), and AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 (average score 28128, delta -0.3%). These rivals all fall within a narrow band of -0.3% to 0.1% of the AMD chip’s average score, indicating the 5655G performs in a tightly competitive cluster.

The Intel Core i9-14901TE has no benchmark scores, no average score, and no nearest rivals recorded. Its 50th percentile ranking exists without supporting measurement data. This absence prevents any verdict on relative performance. The specification sheet suggests the Intel chip could excel in multi-core workloads due to its higher core count, larger caches, and higher boost clock, but the database cannot confirm this. The AMD chip’s recorded performance places it in the upper quintile of all CPUs, while the Intel chip’s percentile is unverified. For a benchmark-based decision, the AMD processor is the only one with demonstrated results.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G wins in areas where recorded data exists. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17249 and single-core score of 2435 indicate solid performance for both threaded and light workloads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 19129 and single-thread score of 3241 reinforce this pattern. The 80th percentile ranking places it ahead of most CPUs in the database. Its 65 W TDP and 7 nm process suggest efficiency advantages, though no direct efficiency measurements are recorded for the Intel part.

The Intel Core i9-14901TE wins on paper specifications. The 8-core, 16-thread design provides more parallel execution resources. The 36 MB L3 cache and 2 MB L2 per core offer substantial cache capacity. PCIe Gen 5 support enables faster connectivity for modern add-in cards. DDR5 memory support provides access to higher bandwidth memory modules. The 45 W TDP is 20 watts lower than the AMD chip, which could imply lower power draw. The 5.50 GHz boost clock is the highest frequency recorded for either processor. These attributes position the Intel chip favorably for latency-sensitive or bandwidth-heavy applications, but the lack of benchmark data means these advantages remain theoretical within the database’s framework.

For users relying on measured performance, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G is the only option with verified results. For users prioritizing raw specifications, the Intel Core i9-14901TE offers a compelling feature set that awaits benchmark validation.