AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G vs Intel Core i9-14901E Comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G and Intel Core i9-14901E represent two very different approaches to the desktop processor. The AMD part is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 design built on a 7 nm process, while the Intel part is an 8-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake Refresh chip on a 10 nm node. Both have a 65 W thermal design power and target the desktop market, but the benchmark data shows a clear performance hierarchy across nearly every workload category.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i9-14901E dominates the benchmark suite, winning 16 of the 17 recorded comparisons. Its advantages appear in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads, ranging from Cinebench render tests to PassMark math and sorting tasks. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G secures exactly one victory, in the PassMark extended instructions test, which measures advanced instruction set performance. That single win suggests the AMD chip has a specific strength in niche computational paths, likely related to its architecture’s handling of certain vector or cryptography-related operations. Everywhere else, the Intel part leads by margins that vary from modest to overwhelming.

For users prioritizing raw compute throughput, the Intel Core i9-14901E is the clear choice. Its wins in floating-point math, integer math, prime number finding, and multithreaded workloads point to a processor that handles heavy number-crunching with ease. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G, despite its smaller core count, remains a capable option for tasks that rely on extended instruction efficiency, as shown by its 4% advantage in that specific metric. The data indicates that anyone running software that heavily uses those instruction extensions might prefer the AMD chip, but for general-purpose computing, the Intel part holds a substantial edge.

Architecture Differences

The two processors stem from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G uses Zen 3 architecture under the Cezanne codename, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The chip integrates 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. Cache is organized as 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel Core i9-14901E belongs to the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, with Raptor Lake-R codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. Its die size is 257 mm², and while the transistor count is not recorded in the database, the larger die reflects a more complex design. Intel’s cache hierarchy differs significantly: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a much larger 36 MB of shared L3.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD chip supports DDR4 memory only, with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but its memory bandwidth figure is not listed in the database. PCIe connectivity shows a generational gap: AMD offers PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while Intel provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Both processors support ECC memory, and both include integrated graphics, though the specific models differ: AMD uses Radeon Vega 7, Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. These architectural differences explain much of the performance gap, particularly the larger L3 cache and newer PCIe standard on the Intel side.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the head-to-head data is the consistency of Intel’s dominance in Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Intel Core i9-14901E scores 2595 against the AMD’s 1738, a 33% deficit. The single-core R15 result shows 366 versus 245, also a 33.1% gap. Cinebench R20 multicore repeats the trend: Intel at 10816, AMD at 7244, again 33% behind. The R20 single-core test shows 1526 versus 1022, another 33% difference. Cinebench R23 multicore delivers 25753 for Intel and 17249 for AMD, a 33% deficit, while R23 single-core records 3635 versus 2435, also 33% behind. These uniform percentages across all Cinebench versions indicate a consistent scaling advantage for the Intel chip, likely tied to its higher boost clock of 5.60 GHz compared to the AMD’s 4.40 GHz.

PassMark tests reveal a wider range of margins. The closest Intel win comes in data compression, where Intel scores 288777 against AMD’s 255608, an 11.5% lead. Data encryption shows Intel ahead by 17.9%, with 18571 versus 15253. Random string sorting gives Intel a 35.5% edge, scoring 39138 against 25253. The multithread test shows Intel at 30298 versus AMD’s 19129, a 36.9% gap. Integer math delivers Intel’s 112736 against AMD’s 67561, a 40.1% lead. Floating-point math is even more lopsided: Intel at 81089, AMD at 38649, a 52.3% deficit. The largest Intel advantage appears in physics, where Intel scores 3041 versus AMD’s 686, a massive 77.4% gap. Prime number finding also shows a huge disparity, with Intel at 189 and AMD at 49, a 74.1% deficit. Single-thread performance, measured twice under slightly different names, shows Intel at 4354 versus AMD’s 3241, a 25.6% lead in both cases.

The AMD chip’s only win is in extended instructions, where it scores 17944 against Intel’s 17249, a 4% advantage. This result stands out because it is the sole benchmark where the AMD part outperforms its rival, and the margin is relatively small. The data suggests that AMD’s Zen 3 architecture handles certain extended instruction workloads slightly better, but this does little to offset the Intel part’s commanding leads elsewhere.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on several key specification fields. Core and thread counts are the most obvious: AMD has 6 cores and 12 threads, while Intel has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks differ substantially, with AMD at 3.90 GHz and Intel at 2.80 GHz, but boost clocks reverse the order: AMD at 4.40 GHz and Intel at 5.60 GHz. Socket compatibility is entirely separate, with AMD using Socket AM4 and Intel using Socket 1700. The manufacturing process differs as noted: 7 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. Cache configurations are not identical, with Intel’s larger per-core L1 and L2 and its 36 MB L3 dwarfing AMD’s 16 MB L3. Memory support shows AMD limited to DDR4, while Intel accepts both DDR4 and DDR5. PCIe generation differs, with AMD on Gen 3 and Intel on Gen 5, though both provide 16 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics units are different models, though both are present. Release dates are close, with AMD launching on May 6, 2024, and Intel on June 30, 2024. Both processors have locked multipliers, both are listed as active in production, and neither has a recorded launch MSRP in the database. The part numbers confirm distinct SKUs: 100-000001513 for AMD and Q49ESRNJH for Intel.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E reaches 5.60 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G tops out at 4.40 GHz.

Q: How large is the L3 cache on each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G has 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core i9-14901E has 36 MB of shared L3.

Q: Which CPU supports faster PCIe?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G supports PCIe Gen 3 with the same lane count.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the AMD chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G records a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel part’s memory bandwidth is not listed in the database.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor offer?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which CPU has a larger die size?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has a die size of 257 mm², compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G’s 180 mm². The AMD chip’s transistor count is recorded at 10,700 million, while Intel’s transistor count is not available.

The Verdict

The benchmark data paints an unambiguous picture. The Intel Core i9-14901E wins 16 of 17 comparisons, with advantages ranging from 11.5% in data compression to 77.4% in physics. Its average benchmark score of 37911 places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G averages 28032 and sits in the 80th percentile. The nearest rivals for the Intel part include AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and AMD Ryzen 7 9700X, both with average scores within 0.1% of the Intel chip, confirming it competes at a high level. The AMD part’s nearest rivals include Intel Core i9-12900H and Intel Core i5-14500T, with score differences under 0.3%, showing it operates in a lower performance tier.

For users who need maximum compute performance across rendering, math, sorting, and physics workloads, the Intel Core i9-14901E is the data-supported choice. Its larger core count, higher boost clock, bigger L3 cache, and newer PCIe generation all contribute to its dominance. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G offers one clear advantage in extended instructions, but that single win does not compensate for the substantial deficits elsewhere. The Intel chip also carries a higher percentile ranking, indicating better overall standing in the broader CPU landscape. The AMD part remains a functional desktop processor for basic tasks, but the recorded measurements show no contest in most scenarios. The verdict from the data is straightforward: Intel leads, and AMD trails by wide margins in nearly every measurable workload.