AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G vs Intel Core i5-13490F Comparison

The Intel Core i5-13490F and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G are both 65-watt desktop processors aimed at similar performance tiers, but the benchmark data tells a remarkably one-sided story. Across all 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, the Intel Core i5-13490F emerges victorious, with wins ranging from a modest 16.1% advantage to a staggering 179.2% lead. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical—28,185 for the Intel part versus 28,032 for the AMD part—placing both in the 80th percentile of all CPUs, but that similarity masks the fact that the AMD chip achieves its score through a fundamentally different performance profile. The i5-13490F is the clear choice for any workload that stresses multi-threading, floating-point math, or physics calculations, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G offers a key feature the Intel part lacks: integrated graphics with Radeon Vega 7.

The Verdict

The data points to a decisive recommendation: choose the Intel Core i5-13490F for virtually any compute-focused desktop build. It wins every single head-to-head benchmark in the dataset, with particularly dominant margins in physics (179.2% ahead), prime number finding (132.7% ahead), and floating-point math (55.9% ahead). The Intel part's 10 cores and 16 threads simply overwhelm the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G's 6 cores and 12 threads in multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by a 31.9% lead across all three Cinebench multi-core tests (R15, R20, and R23). Even in single-threaded performance, where core count matters less, the i5-13490F maintains a consistent 31.9% edge in Cinebench R23 single-core (3,211 vs 2,435) and an 18.1% lead in PassMark single-thread (3,828 vs 3,241). The only scenario where the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G makes sense is when you need a processor with integrated graphics—its Radeon Vega 7 iGPU is present, while the i5-13490F has no integrated graphics at all. If you are building a system without a discrete GPU, the Ryzen chip is the only option of the two; otherwise, the Intel processor is superior in every measured performance category.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and design philosophies. The Intel Core i5-13490F is built on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename, using a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel itself. It features 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 215 mm². Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, running on a dual-channel bus. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Notably, it has no integrated graphics and does not support ECC memory. The processor fits the Intel Socket 1700 and was released on February 9, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $235.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G, by contrast, is based on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a higher base clock of 3.90 GHz but a lower boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The cache is smaller across the board: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3. The die size is 180 mm², and the transistor count is listed at 10,700 million. Memory support is limited to DDR4 on a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It supports ECC memory, a notable difference from the Intel part. PCIe connectivity is older Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. It includes integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics. The socket is AMD Socket AM4, and it was released on May 6, 2024.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F is faster in every multi-threaded benchmark. It leads by 31.9% in Cinebench R23 multi-core (22,747 vs 17,249) and by 38.9% in PassMark multithread (26,569 vs 19,129). The advantage comes from its 10 cores and 16 threads versus the AMD's 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G includes Radeon Vega 7 integrated graphics. The Intel Core i5-13490F has no integrated graphics, which means the AMD chip can run a display without a discrete GPU.

Q: What is the performance difference in single-threaded tasks?

A: The Intel part is consistently ahead. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the i5-13490F scores 3,211 versus 2,435 for the Ryzen, a 31.9% advantage. In PassMark single-thread, the Intel chip scores 3,828 versus 3,241, an 18.1% lead.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i5-13490F does not. This could be a deciding factor for users who require error-correcting memory.

Q: How do the memory support options differ?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G supports only DDR4. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the difference in PCIe connectivity?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G supports the older PCIe Gen 3 standard with 16 lanes.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-13490F | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.50 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Zen 3 |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-S | Cezanne |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 180 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 16 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not specified | 51.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes | Gen 3, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Radeon Vega 7 |

| Release Date | 2023-02-09 | 2024-05-06 |

| Launch MSRP | $235 | Not specified |

| Part Number | SRMC0 | 100-000001513 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results are unambiguous: the Intel Core i5-13490F wins all 17 head-to-head comparisons. The largest margins come in specialized workloads. PassMark physics shows the most extreme gap, with the Intel part scoring 1,915 against the AMD's 686, a 179.2% difference. Similarly, PassMark find prime numbers yields a 132.7% advantage for Intel (114 vs 49). Floating-point math follows at 55.9% ahead (60,273 vs 38,649). These results indicate the Intel processor has a substantial edge in computational density and raw arithmetic throughput.

In rendering and content creation, the gap narrows but remains decisive. All three Cinebench multi-core tests show a consistent 31.9% advantage for Intel: R15 scores 2,292 vs 1,738, R20 scores 9,553 vs 7,244, and R23 scores 22,747 vs 17,249. The single-core Cinebench tests show the same 31.9% delta, with R15 at 323 vs 245, R20 at 1,348 vs 1,022, and R23 at 3,211 vs 2,435. This consistency suggests the Intel architecture has a clear per-clock performance advantage that scales across both single and multi-threaded scenarios.

General productivity benchmarks follow the same pattern. PassMark multithread gives Intel a 38.9% lead (26,569 vs 19,129), while PassMark single-thread shows an 18.1% advantage (3,828 vs 3,241). Data compression favors Intel by 28.5% (328,397 vs 255,608), random string sorting by 34.8% (34,042 vs 25,253), and integer math by 23.9% (83,723 vs 67,561). The smallest wins for Intel are in data encryption (17.4% ahead, 17,902 vs 15,253) and extended instructions (16.1% ahead, 20,837 vs 17,944), but even these represent substantial margins. The average benchmark scores—28,185 for Intel versus 28,032 for AMD—are separated by just 0.5%, but that similarity is misleading; the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G's integrated graphics and ECC support are its only redeeming features in this comparison.