AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs Intel Xeon E-2224G Comparison

The benchmark data shows a clear, consistent performance advantage for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G across every single-core and multi-core workload tested. The Intel Xeon E-2224G, despite its higher boost clock and server-oriented positioning, trails by a significant margin in all six head-to-head comparisons, with the AMD part winning every round.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G dominates the multi-core tests with a consistent lead of approximately 12%. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD chip scores 732 against the Xeon's 644, a delta of -12% from the Intel perspective. This pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 multi-core, where the Ryzen scores 3051 versus 2687, and in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it reaches 7266 compared to 6398. The deltas are nearly identical across these three generations of the Cinebench test, all hovering around -11.9% to -12%, indicating a stable performance gap that does not widen or narrow with workload intensity.

Single-core results tell the same story. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Ryzen leads with 103 points against the Xeon's 90, a -12.6% delta. The R20 and R23 single-core tests show the AMD part scoring 430 and 1025 respectively, against Intel's 379 and 903, with deltas of -11.9% in both cases. The consistency of these margins — roughly 12% across every test — suggests the advantage is structural rather than workload-specific. The Ryzen's 8 threads versus the Xeon's 4 threads likely explain the multi-core gap, but the single-core lead is more surprising given the Intel part's higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz compared to 3.90 GHz on the AMD chip.

Geekbench results are only available for the Xeon, not the Ryzen, so no direct comparison exists for that benchmark suite. However, the available Cinebench data is comprehensive across three versions, providing a robust picture. The Xeon's average benchmark score of 2117 is only marginally higher than the Ryzen's 2101, a difference of less than 1%, yet this aggregate number masks the consistent per-test defeat. The head-to-head table shows zero wins for the Intel part and six for the AMD part, making the overall verdict unambiguous.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Xeon E-2224G is built on the Coffee Lake architecture, specifically the Coffee Lake-S WS variant, using a 14 nm process at Intel's own foundry. It is a server/workstation part from the Xeon E-2200 series, released on 2019-05-28. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses the Zen architecture under the codename Raven Ridge, also on a 14 nm process but manufactured by GlobalFoundries. It belongs to the 2000 series and was released earlier, on 2018-05-09, targeting the desktop segment.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. The Xeon provides 4 cores and 4 threads, meaning no simultaneous multithreading. The Ryzen offers 4 cores but 8 threads, effectively doubling the thread count. This is the most consequential architectural difference, as it directly explains the multi-core benchmark results. The Xeon's cache hierarchy uses 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Ryzen has larger per-core caches at 96 KB L1 and 512 KB L2, but a smaller 4 MB shared L3, exactly half the Intel part's total.

The integrated graphics differ substantially. Intel pairs the Xeon with HD Graphics P630, while AMD includes the Radeon RX Vega 11. Both are integrated solutions, but the Vega 11 is generally positioned as a more capable graphics processor. Memory bandwidth favors the AMD chip at 46.9 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s for the Intel, despite both using dual-channel DDR4. The Xeon uses Intel Socket 1151, while the Ryzen fits AMD Socket AM4. Both support ECC memory, which is notable for a desktop part like the Ryzen.

PCIe lane availability is another differentiator. The Xeon provides 16 CPU lanes on PCIe Gen 3, while the Ryzen offers only 8 lanes. This matters for expandability in workstation scenarios. The Xeon's die size is 126 mm² with no disclosed transistor count, while the Ryzen's die is 210 mm² with 4,950 million transistors — a larger, more complex chip. The Ryzen also has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, whereas the Xeon is locked. The Xeon has a TDP of 71 watts, slightly higher than the Ryzen's 65 watts, and is listed as end-of-life, while the Ryzen remains active in production.

Where Each One Wins

The data is one-sided, but the reasons behind it are worth examining. The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G wins on every benchmark where both were tested, which covers all Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 variants. Its 8 threads provide a clear advantage in multi-threaded rendering workloads, as evidenced by the consistent ~12% lead in multi-core tests. The single-core wins, though smaller in absolute terms, are still consistent across all three Cinebench versions. This suggests the Ryzen's Zen architecture extracts more instructions per clock than the Coffee Lake design, despite the Intel chip's higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

The Xeon E-2224G has no benchmark wins in this comparison. Its strengths lie outside the tested workloads. The 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes make it more suitable for systems requiring multiple expansion cards or high-bandwidth peripherals. The server/workstation market segment designation indicates it is validated for 24/7 operation and professional environments. Its 8 MB of L3 cache is double the Ryzen's, which could benefit certain cache-sensitive applications, though this is not reflected in the Cinebench results. The Intel part also has a higher boost clock by 0.80 GHz, which might help in short, lightly-threaded bursts, but the single-core benchmarks show this does not translate into a win.

The Ryzen's advantages extend to power efficiency, with a 65-watt TDP versus 71 watts for the Xeon, and higher memory bandwidth at 46.9 GB/s. Its unlocked multiplier is a clear win for enthusiasts or system builders who want to extract additional performance. The Radeon RX Vega 11 integrated graphics are also a significant differentiator for systems without a discrete GPU, though the benchmark data does not include graphics tests. For gaming or general desktop use, the Ryzen's combination of more threads and better integrated graphics makes it the more versatile part.

The Verdict

The benchmark results are decisive: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G outperforms the Intel Xeon E-2224G in every tested workload. The Ryzen wins all six head-to-head benchmarks with a consistent margin of approximately 12%, whether single-core or multi-core. Its 8 threads give it a structural advantage in multi-threaded tasks, while its higher per-core performance in single-threaded tests indicates a more efficient architecture overall. The Ryzen also offers a lower TDP, higher memory bandwidth, ECC support, and an unlocked multiplier, making it arguably the better engineering choice for most use cases.

The Xeon E-2224G remains relevant only in specific scenarios that the benchmarks do not cover. Its 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes and server/workstation market segment make it a candidate for systems requiring extensive I/O or validated enterprise reliability. The 8 MB of L3 cache and higher boost clock are theoretical advantages that do not materialize in Cinebench results. For anyone choosing between these two based on raw performance, the data says to pick the Ryzen. For those who need the Xeon's specific platform features, such as the socket 1151 ecosystem or the larger PCIe lane count, the Intel part has a narrow niche, but it is a niche defined by platform compatibility rather than computational speed.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G wins all multi-core benchmarks, scoring 732 in Cinebench R15, 3051 in R20, and 7266 in R23, compared to the Intel Xeon E-2224G's 644, 2687, and 6398 respectively, representing a consistent ~12% lead.

Q: Is the single-core performance also better on the AMD part?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G wins all single-core tests with scores of 103 in R15, 430 in R20, and 1025 in R23, versus the Xeon's 90, 379, and 903, showing a ~12% advantage despite the Intel chip's higher boost clock.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference?

A: Both processors have 4 cores, but the Intel Xeon E-2224G has 4 threads while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has 8 threads, giving the AMD part twice the thread count for parallel workloads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon E-2224G and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G support ECC memory, which is unusual for the desktop-oriented Ryzen part.

Q: Which processor has more PCIe lanes?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2224G provides 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G provides only 8 lanes, making the Intel part more suitable for expandable systems.

Q: Are there any benchmark wins for the Intel Xeon E-2224G?

A: No, the head-to-head data shows zero wins for the Intel part and six wins for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G across all tested Cinebench workloads.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon E-2224G | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |

|----------------|-------------------|-----------------------|

| Threads | 4 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.50 GHz | 3.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| TDP | 71 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Coffee Lake | Zen |

| Codename | Coffee Lake-S WS | Raven Ridge |

| Foundry | Intel | GlobalFoundries |

| Die Size | 126 mm² | 210 mm² |

| Transistors | Not disclosed | 4,950 million |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s | 46.9 GB/s |

| PCIe Lanes | 16 (Gen 3) | 8 (Gen 3) |

| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics P630 | Radeon RX Vega 11 |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Desktop |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2019-05-28 | 2018-05-09 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |