AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is a 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor built on the Zen architecture (Raven Ridge) using a 14 nm process from GlobalFoundries. It operates at a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz, with a TDP of 65. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, includes ECC memory support, and offers PCIe Gen 3 with 8 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are provided by a Radeon RX Vega 11 GPU. With an average benchmark score of 2101, it sits at the 48th percentile among all CPUs, placing it in the mid-range of desktop processors.

Platform and Compatibility

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses the AMD Socket AM4, a mainstream desktop socket. Memory support is limited to DDR4, with a dual-channel bus that delivers a theoretical bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is a notable feature for workstations or small servers that require error correction. The processor provides PCIe Gen 3 with 8 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a single discrete graphics card or a few NVMe drives, though the lane count is modest compared to higher-end parts. The integrated Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics mean that a discrete GPU is not mandatory for basic display output.

The CPU is based on the Zen microarchitecture with the codename Raven Ridge, fabricated on a 14 nm process. The die contains 4,950 million transistors across a 210 mm² area. The cache hierarchy includes 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking if the motherboard and cooling permit. The processor was released on 2018-05-09 and remains in active production. The part number is YD240BC5M4MFBYD240BC5FBMPK. No launch MSRP is listed in the data.

Who Should Consider It

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is best suited for users whose workloads align with its 4-core/8-thread configuration and integrated graphics. The average benchmark score of 2101 and 48th percentile ranking indicate that it is a mid-pack performer overall. For general office tasks, web browsing, and productivity applications, the CPU’s multi-threading capability and integrated GPU provide a smooth experience without needing a separate graphics card. The Radeon RX Vega 11 integrated graphics can handle light gaming and video playback, though demanding 3D titles will require a discrete GPU.

For content creation, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 7266 suggests that the CPU can handle modest rendering, video encoding, and batch photo editing. The single-core scores (1025 in R23, 430 in R20) are relatively modest, so applications that rely heavily on single-thread performance—such as some legacy software or lightly threaded games—may not see the same level of responsiveness. The 8 threads help with multi-threaded tasks like compilation, spreadsheet calculations, and multitasking. The 65 TDP also makes it a good fit for compact builds where cooling is constrained, though the integrated GPU shares the thermal budget.

How It Compares

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G sits in a tight cluster of rivals, with its average score of 2101 differing by less than 1% from each of the four nearest competitors.

Intel Core i3-9350KF: The i3-9350KF has an average score of 2099, which is 0.1% lower than the Ryzen’s 2101. This is a statistical tie. The i3 lacks integrated graphics, so the Ryzen’s built-in Vega 11 provides an advantage for systems without a discrete GPU. The Ryzen also has double the thread count (8 vs. 4), which may benefit multi-threaded workloads despite the similar average score.

Intel Xeon W-2123: The Xeon W-2123 scores 2095, 0.3% behind the Ryzen. This is again within noise. The Xeon is a workstation part with a different feature set, but the Ryzen offers ECC memory support as well, making it a viable alternative for budget ECC builds. The Ryzen’s integrated graphics give it an edge in small form factor systems.

Intel Core i5-8500T: The i5-8500T averages 2090, 0.5% lower than the Ryzen. The i5-8500T is a low-power (T-series) chip with 6 cores and 6 threads, but its lower clock speeds and lack of SMT contribute to a similar overall score. The Ryzen’s 8 threads may handle concurrent tasks better, while the i5’s extra physical cores could be preferable for certain lightly threaded workloads.

Intel Core i5-8259U: The i5-8259U is the only rival that edges out the Ryzen, with an average score of 2115—0.7% higher. This is a mobile processor (U-series) with 4 cores and 8 threads, similar to the Ryzen. The margin is negligible, and the Ryzen’s desktop socket and unlocked multiplier offer more flexibility for upgrades and overclocking.

FAQ

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK lists ECC memory support as true, making it suitable for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: What integrated graphics does it include?

A: It includes a Radeon RX Vega 11 GPU, which can handle display output and light graphics tasks without a discrete card.

Q: What socket does this CPU use?

A: It uses AMD Socket AM4, a common desktop platform.

Q: What is the TDP of the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G?

A: The TDP is 65, indicating a moderate power envelope that is manageable with a standard air cooler.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing users to adjust clock speeds if the motherboard supports it.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth?

A: The dual-channel DDR4 configuration provides a memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G’s benchmark results span three versions of Cinebench. In Cinebench R15, it scores 732 in multi-core and 103 in single-core. In R20, the scores are 3051 (multi) and 430 (single). In R23, the most recent test, it achieves 7266 multi-core and 1025 single-core. These scores show a consistent scaling pattern: the multi-core results are roughly seven times the single-core results, reflecting the benefit of the 8 threads.

The average benchmark score of 2101 places the CPU at the 48th percentile of all CPUs. This means it outperforms just under half of the processors in the database. The nearest rivals all fall within 0.7% of this average score, indicating that the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is effectively tied with a group of mid-range Intel parts. Specifically, it is 0.1% ahead of the Core i3-9350KF, 0.3% ahead of the Xeon W-2123, 0.5% ahead of the Core i5-8500T, and 0.7% behind the Core i5-8259U. These deltas are so small that real-world differences would be imperceptible in most applications.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 7266 is a strong indicator of multi-threaded performance for a 4-core processor. In comparison, the single-core score of 1025 is modest, which aligns with the CPU’s base and boost clocks of 3.60 and 3.90 GHz. The R20 and R15 results follow the same trend, with multi-core scores that are proportionally much higher than single-core scores. This suggests that the CPU’s architecture and thread scheduling are well-optimized for parallel workloads, but per-core performance is not exceptional.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The split between single-thread and multi-thread performance is pronounced. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 7266 is over seven times the single-core score of 1025. Similar ratios appear in R20 (3051 vs. 430) and R15 (732 vs. 103). This indicates that the CPU scales very well with additional threads, which is expected for a 4-core/8-thread design with SMT. The 8 threads allow the processor to handle multiple concurrent tasks efficiently, making it well-suited for video encoding, 3D rendering, and multitasking environments.

However, the single-core scores are relatively low. A single-core score of 1025 in R23 places it below many modern desktop processors that achieve scores in the 1500–2000 range. This means that applications which are heavily dependent on single-thread performance—such as older games, certain spreadsheet macros, or some web browsers—may not see the same level of responsiveness as CPUs with higher per-core throughput. The base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost of 3.90 GHz are not extreme, and the Zen architecture’s IPC (instructions per clock) is lower than newer designs.

For real-world workloads, the implication is that the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G excels in parallel tasks but may lag in serial tasks. A user who frequently runs multi-threaded benchmarks or compiles large codebases will benefit from the 8 threads. Conversely, a user who plays fast-twitch games that rely on a single core might find performance insufficient. The integrated Radeon RX Vega 11 GPU further complicates the picture, as it shares memory bandwidth and thermal headroom with the CPU, potentially affecting sustained multi-threaded performance in compact systems.

Overall, the data shows a processor that is balanced for mainstream productivity, with a clear strength in multi-threading and a modest single-thread capability. Its position at the 48th percentile and the near-identical scores of its closest rivals confirm that it is a competent mid-range choice, but not a standout in any single dimension.