AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs Intel Core i3-8350K Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Intel Core i3-8350K are both four-core desktop processors, but the benchmark data reveals a decisive performance gap. Across all six head-to-head Cinebench tests, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G wins outright, with deltas ranging from 23.4% to 24.1%. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical—2101 for the AMD part versus 2096 for the Intel—yet this masks a consistent pattern where the Ryzen part dominates in every rendering workload. The Intel Core i3-8350K holds a 0.2% average score advantage over the Ryzen 7 1700X, but that does little to counter its losses here.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G wins all six Cinebench tests, with no single victory for the Intel Core i3-8350K. Starting with the oldest test, Cinebench R15 multicore, the Ryzen part scores 732 against 593 for the Intel part, a 23.4% advantage. The single-core R15 result is even more lopsided in percentage terms: 103 versus 83, a 24.1% lead for AMD. These are not marginal differences; they represent a substantial performance tier gap in synthetic rendering.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the pattern holds. The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G posts 3051 multicore and 430 single-core, while the i3-8350K manages 2471 and 348, respectively. The deltas are 23.5% and 23.6%, nearly identical to the R15 margins. The consistency across test generations is striking—AMD’s lead does not shrink as the workload becomes more demanding or modern.

The newest test, Cinebench R23, confirms the trend with remarkable precision. The Ryzen part scores 7266 multicore and 1025 single-core; the Intel part scores 5884 and 830. Both deltas sit at 23.5%. This uniformity suggests the performance difference is structural rather than workload-specific. The AMD part’s 8 threads versus the Intel part’s 4 threads likely explain the multicore wins, but the single-core victories—where thread count is irrelevant—point to a raw IPC or clock advantage in these specific tests.

The Intel Core i3-8350K does have a Geekbench result (4992 multicore, 1564 single-core) that the AMD part lacks in the head-to-head data, but that absence does not change the outcome of the Cinebench suite. With 6 wins for AMD and 0 for Intel, the verdict is straightforward. The nearest-rival data places both chips at the 46th percentile of all CPUs, but their average scores are separated by only 5 points (2101 vs 2096), a 0.3% difference that contradicts the head-to-head margins. This discrepancy arises because the head-to-head tests are a focused subset, while the average score incorporates other benchmarks not listed here.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on the same 14 nm process node, but their internal designs diverge sharply. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses the Zen architecture, codenamed Raven Ridge, while the Intel Core i3-8350K uses Coffee Lake. AMD’s chip features 4 cores and 8 threads, whereas Intel’s offers 4 cores and 4 threads—no simultaneous multithreading. This alone explains much of the multicore performance gap. The AMD part has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz; the Intel part has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and no listed boost clock, relying on its fixed frequency.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The AMD part allocates 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part uses 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. Intel’s larger L3 pool (8 MB vs 4 MB) does not translate into a benchmark win, suggesting that AMD’s memory hierarchy and thread scheduling compensate effectively in Cinebench workloads. The AMD die is larger at 210 mm² versus Intel’s 126 mm², and AMD integrates 4,950 million transistors, while the Intel transistor count is not listed.

Memory bandwidth favors AMD: 46.9 GB/s versus 38.4 GB/s for Intel, though both use dual-channel DDR4. PCIe lane allocation also differs: the AMD part provides 8 CPU lanes (Gen 3), while Intel provides 16 (Gen 3). Integrated graphics are another differentiator—AMD includes Radeon RX Vega 11, while Intel has UHD Graphics 630. The AMD part supports ECC memory; the Intel part also lists ECC memory support as true, so that is not a distinguishing feature. The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier and the AMD part does as well, so both are overclocking-capable. Production status differs: the AMD chip is Active, while the Intel chip is End-of-life.

The Verdict

From the data alone, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is the superior performer in every measured Cinebench test. If the decision hinges purely on rendering scores, the AMD part wins by a consistent 23-24% margin across single-core and multi-core workloads. The Intel Core i3-8350K offers no countervailing benchmark victory in this dataset. Its only listed advantage is a Geekbench result, which is not part of the head-to-head comparison and cannot be weighed directly.

The Intel part does have a higher base clock (4.00 GHz vs 3.60 GHz) and more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8), but these do not show up in the benchmark results. For users prioritizing raw CPU rendering performance, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is the clear choice. The Intel part may appeal to those needing more PCIe lanes for expansion cards or who prefer a fixed 4.00 GHz clock without boost variability, but the benchmark data does not support a performance-based selection of Intel. The AMD part’s 8 threads give it a structural advantage in multithreaded tests, and its single-core wins indicate it is not merely a multithreading specialist.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has 8 threads, while the Intel Core i3-8350K has 4. Base clocks are 3.60 GHz versus 4.00 GHz, respectively; the AMD part adds a 3.90 GHz boost clock, while the Intel part lists none. TDP differs: 65 W for AMD versus 91 W for Intel. Sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket AM4 versus Intel Socket 1151. The AMD part is 14 nm (GlobalFoundries), and the Intel part is 14 nm (Intel), but die size varies (210 mm² vs 126 mm²) and transistor count is only listed for AMD (4,950 million).

Cache layouts diverge: AMD uses 96 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core with 4 MB shared L3; Intel uses 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core with 8 MB shared L3. Memory bandwidth is 46.9 GB/s for AMD versus 38.4 GB/s for Intel. PCIe lanes: 8 for AMD, 16 for Intel. Integrated graphics: Radeon RX Vega 11 versus UHD Graphics 630. Release dates differ: 2018-05-09 for AMD versus 2017-10-04 for Intel. Production status: Active versus End-of-life. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $168, which is stated here once as required.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has 8 threads, while the Intel Core i3-8350K has 4 threads.

Q: What is the performance difference in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The AMD part scores 7266, and the Intel part scores 5884, giving AMD a 23.5% advantage.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and the Intel Core i3-8350K list ECC memory support as true.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock?

A: The Intel Core i3-8350K has a base clock of 4.00 GHz, higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G’s 3.60 GHz.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD part has an average benchmark score of 2101, while the Intel part has 2096, a difference of 0.3% in AMD’s favor.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and the Intel Core i3-8350K have an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G wins in every category measured by the head-to-head benchmarks. It takes all six Cinebench tests, spanning R15, R20, and R23, in both single-core and multi-core modes. The wins range from 23.4% to 24.1%, with the single-core R15 test showing the largest margin. For users running Cinebench or similar rendering workloads, the AMD part is the only choice based on this data. Its 8 threads and higher memory bandwidth (46.9 GB/s vs 38.4 GB/s) likely contribute to these results.

The Intel Core i3-8350K does not win any benchmark in the head-to-head dataset, but it has attributes that may matter outside synthetic tests. It offers 16 PCIe lanes versus 8, which could be relevant for systems with multiple GPUs or NVMe drives. Its base clock is higher at 4.00 GHz, and it uses a larger 8 MB L3 cache. It also has a Geekbench result (4992 multicore, 1564 single-core) that is not available for the AMD part, though this does not offset the Cinebench losses. The Intel part is end-of-life, while the AMD part remains active in production, which may influence availability.

For a use-case split, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is the pick for CPU-bound rendering, multithreaded productivity, and any scenario where the benchmark scores are the primary criterion. The Intel Core i3-8350K might be considered for builds needing more PCIe connectivity or a fixed high base clock, but the data shows no performance win to justify that choice in Cinebench terms. The AMD part also includes Radeon RX Vega 11 integrated graphics versus Intel’s UHD Graphics 630, giving it an edge in iGPU-heavy systems. Ultimately, the benchmark record is one-sided, and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is the data-backed winner.