AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs Intel Core i3-10105T Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G records an average benchmark score of 2101, while the Intel Core i3-10105T scores 2058. The AMD part sits 0.3% above the Intel Core i3-8350K and 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X, whereas the Intel part is exactly tied with the Intel Core i7-8705G at 2058.

Q: How do the two chips compare in multi-core rendering workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G leads in every multi-core Cinebench test. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 7266 versus 6656 for the Intel Core i3-10105T, a 9.2% advantage. The gap is similar in R20 multi-core (3051 vs 2795, 9.2% delta) and R15 multi-core (732 vs 670, 9.3% delta).

Q: Does the Intel chip win any single-core tests?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G wins all six head-to-head benchmark comparisons, including every single-core Cinebench test. In Cinebench R23 single-core, AMD scores 1025 versus Intel's 939, a 9.2% delta. The closest single-core margin is R20 single-core, where AMD leads 430 to 394, a 9.1% delta.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i3-10105T has a 35 W TDP, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has a 65 W TDP. Despite the lower power envelope, the Intel part does not translate that into a performance advantage in the recorded Cinebench results.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i3-10105T does not. Both processors use dual-channel DDR4 memory, but the AMD part has a higher memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s compared to 42.7 GB/s for the Intel part.

Q: Are both processors currently in production?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and the Intel Core i3-10105T are listed as Active in production status. The AMD part was released on 2018-05-09, while the Intel part was released later on 2021-03-15.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Intel Core i3-10105T both use 14 nm process nodes, but the similarity ends there. AMD's chip is built on the Zen architecture with the Raven Ridge codename, fabricated by GlobalFoundries. Intel's chip uses the Comet Lake architecture with the Comet Lake-R codename, fabricated by Intel's own foundry.

The cache hierarchies reveal a clear difference in design philosophy. AMD allocates 96 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, with a shared 4 MB L3 cache. Intel allocates 64 KB of L1 per core and 256 KB of L2 per core, but a larger shared 6 MB L3 cache. The AMD part also has a much larger die size at 210 mm² with 4,950 million transistors, while the Intel die size and transistor count are not recorded in the database.

Both processors feature 4 cores and 8 threads, and both run at a boost clock of 3.90 GHz. The base clocks differ, with AMD at 3.60 GHz versus Intel at 3.00 GHz. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, while the Intel chip has a locked multiplier.

Integrated graphics differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G includes Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics, while the Intel Core i3-10105T includes UHD Graphics 630. PCIe lane counts also differ: AMD provides 8 Gen 3 lanes from the CPU, while Intel provides 16 Gen 3 lanes. Memory bandwidth favors AMD at 46.9 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s for Intel, and only AMD supports ECC memory.

The sockets are incompatible: AMD uses Socket AM4, while Intel uses Socket 1200. The release dates are also separated by nearly three years, with AMD launching on 2018-05-09 and Intel on 2021-03-15. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $134, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a clear winner for compute-heavy workloads. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G wins all six head-to-head benchmark comparisons, with deltas ranging from 9.1% to 9.6% across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, both single-core and multi-core. The average benchmark score also favors AMD, 2101 versus 2058, a difference of roughly 2%.

Users who prioritize ECC memory support or an unlocked multiplier should choose the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G. The same chip offers a higher base clock (3.60 GHz vs 3.00 GHz) and higher memory bandwidth (46.9 GB/s vs 42.7 GB/s). The Intel Core i3-10105T, however, consumes less power at 35 W TDP versus 65 W TDP, which may matter for compact or low-noise builds where thermal headroom is tight.

The Intel part offers more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8 from the CPU) and a larger L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB), but these advantages do not translate into higher Cinebench scores. For users who need the absolute lowest power draw and a locked, simple platform, the Intel chip is the reasonable pick. For everyone else, the AMD part's consistent 9%+ lead in every recorded benchmark makes it the stronger compute option.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two processors differ, per the database records.

| Field | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G | Intel Core i3-10105T |

|---|---|---|

| Series | 2000 series | Core 10th Gen |

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Base Clock | 3.60 GHz | 3.00 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1200 |

| Architecture | Zen | Comet Lake |

| Codename | Raven Ridge | Comet Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen (Raven Ridge)) | Core i3 (Comet Lake) |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | Intel |

| Transistors | 4,950 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 46.9 GB/s | 42.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 | UHD Graphics 630 |

| Release Date | 2018-05-09 | 2021-03-15 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $134 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Part Number | YD240BC5M4MFBYD240BC5FBMPK | SRH3R |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 2101 | 2058 |

| Geekbench Multi-core | Not recorded | 3649 |

| Geekbench Single-core | Not recorded | 1265 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite shows a consistent performance pattern. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G scores 732 against the Intel Core i3-10105T's 670, a 9.3% advantage. The single-core R15 result is even closer in percentage terms, with AMD at 103 versus Intel at 94, a 9.6% delta. This is the largest single delta in the entire head-to-head set.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the multi-core test has AMD at 3051 and Intel at 2795, a 9.2% delta. Single-core R20 shows AMD at 430 and Intel at 394, a 9.1% delta. The pattern holds in Cinebench R23: multi-core gives AMD 7266 and Intel 6656, a 9.2% delta, while single-core gives AMD 1025 and Intel 939, also a 9.2% delta.

The AMD chip's win count is six, and Intel's is zero. No benchmark in the recorded head-to-head set favors the Intel part. The closest margins are in the single-core R20 test (9.1%) and the multi-core R20 test (9.2%), while the widest margin is in single-core R15 (9.6%).

The average benchmark scores reinforce the head-to-head results. AMD's 2101 average places it between the Intel Core i5-8259U (2108, -0.3% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (2094, +0.3% delta). Intel's 2058 average ties exactly with the Intel Core i7-8705G (2058, 0% delta) and sits 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 (2055). Both processors land at the 46th percentile versus all CPUs, meaning they occupy the same overall performance tier despite the consistent per-test deltas.

The data does not record Geekbench results for the AMD part, but the Intel Core i3-10105T posts a multi-core score of 3649 and a single-core score of 1265. These figures do not have a direct AMD counterpart in the database, so they cannot be used for a head-to-head comparison. For Cinebench, however, the conclusion is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G outperforms the Intel Core i3-10105T by roughly 9% in every recorded workload, with a slightly wider margin in single-core R15.