AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS and Intel Core 5 213PTE occupy the same performance percentile tier—both sit at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs—yet their benchmark profiles diverge sharply. The Intel part wins 11 of 15 head-to-head comparisons, but the AMD chip secures four victories in specialized workloads, revealing distinct architectural priorities. The average benchmark scores are close: the Ryzen 5 8645HS posts 33,244 against the Intel Core 5 213PTE’s 32,924, a margin of roughly 0.1%. However, that aggregate similarity masks substantial swings in individual tests, ranging from a 44.2% Intel advantage in Cinebench R23 single-core to a 23.9% AMD lead in extended instruction throughput.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive Intel victories come in rendering and computational throughput. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 21,751 versus 13,220 for the Ryzen 5 8645HS, a 39.2% gap. The single-core R23 result is even more lopsided: 3,070 for Intel against 1,714 for AMD, a 44.2% deficit. Cinebench R15 tells a similar story, with Intel ahead by 4.5% in multi-core (2,192 vs. 2,094) and 12.6% in single-core (309 vs. 270). These are not marginal differences; the Intel processor delivers roughly two-thirds more multi-threaded rendering performance in the R23 workload.

The pattern extends to PassMark’s math and physics tests. Intel wins floating-point math by 37.5% (71,722 vs. 44,833) and integer math by 22% (93,109 vs. 72,640). The physics test shows a 50.2% Intel advantage (2,199 vs. 1,095), and prime number finding favors Intel by 52.2% (157 vs. 75). The PassMark multi-thread score goes to Intel by 11.7% (25,590 vs. 22,586), while single-thread performance is a closer affair: 3,718 vs. 3,653, a 1.7% Intel edge.

AMD’s four wins are narrower but consistent in specific domains. Data compression favors the Ryzen 5 8645HS by 1.7% (265,483 vs. 261,083). Data encryption shows a more meaningful 8.2% lead (15,588 vs. 14,413). Random string sorting goes AMD’s way by 5.5% (31,748 vs. 30,106). The largest AMD victory is in extended instructions, where the Ryzen scores 20,003 against Intel’s 16,146—a 23.9% advantage. This suggests the AMD chip handles specialized instruction sets with notably higher efficiency, even as it trails in raw scalar performance.

The Ryzen’s closest rival comparison reinforces its position: it sits 0.1% above the Intel Core i7-14701E and 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, while trailing the Intel Core i5-12600HX by 0.4%. The Intel Core 5 213PTE, by contrast, is 0.1% below the Intel Core i7-12700 and 0.5% below both the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G. These deltas place both chips in the same performance band, but the internal breakdown shows Intel’s wins are generally larger in magnitude than AMD’s.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS is built on Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It packs 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock is 2.10 GHz, but it boosts to 5.20 GHz—higher than the AMD part’s maximum.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The AMD chip provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Intel counters with 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The larger per-core L2 and total L3 on the Intel side likely contribute to its strong single-threaded showing. The transistor counts and die sizes are only listed for AMD: 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, while Intel’s figures are not provided.

Memory support marks another divergence. The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but with a lower listed bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The AMD part does not support ECC memory; the Intel part does. PCIe connectivity differs: AMD offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only)—a generational leap in interconnect speed despite fewer lanes.

Integrated graphics also separate the two. AMD integrates the Radeon 760M, while Intel ships UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part is classified as a mobile processor on the AMD Socket FP8, whereas the Intel part is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. Both have locked multipliers, but their release dates are far apart: the AMD chip launched in December 2023, while the Intel part is dated March 2026.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core rendering?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE is substantially faster. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 21,751 versus 13,220 for the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, a 39.2% advantage. The Cinebench R15 multi-core test shows a smaller 4.5% lead (2,192 vs. 2,094), but the R23 result is the more demanding workload.

Q: Does the AMD chip win any benchmark categories?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS wins four of the 15 head-to-head tests. These include data compression (265,483 vs. 261,083, +1.7%), data encryption (15,588 vs. 14,413, +8.2%), random string sorting (31,748 vs. 30,106, +5.5%), and extended instructions (20,003 vs. 16,146, +23.9%).

Q: How do their single-core performances compare?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE leads in single-core tests, but the margin varies by workload. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel is ahead by 44.2% (3,070 vs. 1,714). In PassMark single-thread, the lead narrows to 1.7% (3,718 vs. 3,653). The Cinebench R15 single-core test shows a 12.6% Intel advantage (309 vs. 270).

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Intel’s additional cores and threads align with its broad multi-threaded benchmark wins.

Q: Do these processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS supports DDR5 only, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but its listed bandwidth is lower at 76.8 GB/s. The Intel part also supports ECC memory, which the AMD part does not.

Q: How do their PCIe capabilities differ?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The Intel Core 5 213PTE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Intel’s newer generation offers higher per-lane bandwidth, though AMD provides more total lanes.

Specification Differences

The two chips differ across nearly every listed specification. Core counts: AMD has 6 cores and 12 threads; Intel has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks: AMD runs at 4.30 GHz; Intel at 2.10 GHz. Boost clocks: AMD reaches 5.00 GHz; Intel reaches 5.20 GHz. Both have a 45 W TDP. The AMD part uses the AMD Socket FP8, while Intel uses the Intel Socket 1700. Process nodes differ: AMD is on 4 nm (TSMC), Intel on 10 nm (Intel). Codename and architecture: AMD is Hawk Point (Zen 4); Intel is Bartlett Lake (architecture not listed).

Cache layouts diverge: AMD provides 64 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 per core, with 16 MB shared L3; Intel provides 80 KB L1 and 2 MB L2 per core, with 24 MB shared L3. Memory support: AMD is DDR5-only; Intel is DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth: AMD lists 89.6 GB/s; Intel lists 76.8 GB/s. ECC support: AMD does not support it; Intel does. PCIe: AMD has Gen 4 with 20 lanes; Intel has Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: AMD ships Radeon 760M; Intel ships UHD Graphics 730. Market segment: AMD is mobile; Intel is desktop. Release dates: AMD December 2023; Intel March 2026. Only Intel has a launch MSRP of $221. AMD’s transistor count is 25,000 million on a 178 mm² die; Intel’s figures are not listed.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE is the clear choice for compute-heavy, multi-threaded workloads. Its 39.2% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 37.5% advantage in floating-point math make it suitable for rendering, scientific computation, and physics simulations. The 50.2% physics test win and 52.2% prime-number advantage reinforce this positioning. Single-core tasks also favor Intel, particularly in Cinebench R23 where the 44.2% gap is decisive. The Intel part’s higher boost clock (5.20 GHz vs. 5.00 GHz) and larger cache (24 MB L3 vs. 16 MB) likely drive these results. For users prioritizing raw throughput in encoding, compilation, or 3D rendering, the Intel chip’s benchmark profile is dominant.

The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS wins in a narrower set of workloads, but those wins are meaningful. The 23.9% lead in extended instructions suggests superior handling of specialized instruction sets, which can benefit cryptography and certain data-processing libraries. The 8.2% encryption win and 1.7% compression win point to efficiency in data-centric tasks. Random string sorting, where AMD leads by 5.5%, indicates a strength in non-numeric data manipulation. The AMD chip’s higher memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s vs. 76.8 GB/s) may contribute to these results. Additionally, its mobile form factor on the FP8 socket with integrated Radeon 760M graphics offers a different deployment profile than Intel’s desktop-oriented Socket 1700 platform.

The overall benchmark averages are nearly identical—33,244 for AMD versus 32,924 for Intel—and both sit at the 83rd percentile. Yet the distribution of wins is lopsided: Intel takes 11 tests, AMD takes 4. The Intel part’s wins are often large (multiple deltas exceeding 20%), while AMD’s wins are mostly single-digit percentages, with the extended-instructions test as the sole exception. For users who can leverage AMD’s specific strengths in encryption, compression, and extended instructions, the Ryzen 5 8645HS remains competitive. For general-purpose performance across a broad benchmark suite, the Intel Core 5 213PTE delivers more consistent and larger advantages.