AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE

CORE STATE Phoenix2
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.4 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 213PTE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,808
2,192
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
255
309
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
7,534
9,135
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,063
1,289
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
17,940
21,751
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,532
3,070
passmark_data_compression
246,397
261,083
passmark_data_encryption
14,197
14,413
passmark_extended_instructions
17,962
16,146
passmark_find_prime_numbers
79
157
passmark_floating_point_math
39,065
71,722
passmark_integer_math
62,666
93,109
passmark_multithread
21,135
25,590
passmark_physics
1,150
2,199
passmark_random_string_sorting
29,501
30,106
passmark_single_thread
3,914
3,718
passmark_singlethread
3,914
3,718

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE vs Intel Core 5 213PTE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear overall winner: the Intel Core 5 213PTE takes 14 of the 17 recorded head-to-head tests, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE manages three wins. The Intel part's advantages are often substantial, though the AMD chip claims a notable single-thread victory.

The most consistent margin appears in the Cinebench suite. Across all six Cinebench tests (R15, R20, and R23, both multicore and singlecore), the Intel Core 5 213PTE leads by exactly 17.5%. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Intel chip scores 21,751 against AMD's 17,940. The singlecore gap is similar: 3,070 versus 2,532 in Cinebench R23 singlecore. This consistency suggests a fundamental performance-per-clock advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk.

The Passmark tests show a wider spread of results. The Intel chip wins the compute-heavy workloads decisively. In floating point math, the Intel part scores 71,722, which is 45.5% ahead of the AMD's 39,065. Integer math shows a 32.7% lead (93,109 versus 62,666). Physics simulation favors Intel even more strongly: 2,199 versus 1,150, a 47.7% margin. Prime number finding shows the largest relative gap at 49.7% (157 versus 79), though both scores are modest in absolute terms.

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE's wins are narrower but meaningful. In Passmark single-thread, the AMD chip scores 3,914 against Intel's 3,718, a 5.3% advantage. This result appears twice in the data (passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread, both identical). The AMD part also wins in extended instructions by 11.2% (17,962 versus 16,146), indicating better efficiency with specialized instruction sets.

The remaining Passmark tests are closer. Data compression shows Intel ahead by 5.6% (261,083 versus 246,397). Data encryption is nearly tied at 1.5% in Intel's favor (14,413 versus 14,197). Random string sorting shows just a 2% difference (30,106 versus 29,501). The multithread score favors Intel by 17.4% (25,590 versus 21,135), which aligns with the Cinebench multicore pattern.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE uses Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with the Phoenix2 codename. It integrates 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses Bartlett Lake on Intel's 10 nm process, with no transistor or die size data recorded in the database.

Core configuration differs significantly. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel chip has 8 cores and 16 threads, giving it a raw thread-count advantage of 33% (16 versus 12). This partially explains the multicore benchmark results, though the per-core performance gap in Cinebench suggests the Intel architecture extracts more work per thread as well.

Cache hierarchies are structured differently. The AMD part allocates 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel part provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Intel cache is larger at every level, with 50% more L3 (24 MB versus 16 MB).

Clock speeds favor Intel at the top end. The Intel chip boosts to 5.20 GHz versus 5.00 GHz for AMD, though the base clocks tell a different story: AMD runs at 3.40 GHz base, Intel at 2.10 GHz. The thermal envelope differs as well, with AMD rated at 35 W TDP and Intel at 45 W TDP.

Memory support shows a split. The AMD chip supports only DDR5, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. Recorded memory bandwidth favors AMD at 83.2 GB/s versus Intel's 76.8 GB/s, a 8.3% difference. Both support ECC memory.

Platform connectivity differs by generation. AMD uses Socket AM5 with PCIe Gen 4, providing 14 CPU lanes. Intel uses Socket 1700 with PCIe Gen 5, providing 16 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics also differ: AMD pairs with Radeon 740M, Intel with UHD Graphics 730. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel part is locked. The AMD chip is classified as a mobile segment part, while the Intel chip is desktop segment. The Intel launch date is recorded as 2026-03-08, the AMD as 2024-04-15.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE is the clear choice for compute-heavy, parallel workloads. The 45.5% lead in floating point math and 32.7% lead in integer math indicate strong ALU/FPU throughput. Physics simulation (47.7% ahead) and prime number finding (49.7% ahead) confirm this pattern. The consistent 17.5% Cinebench margin across all versions suggests that rendering and content creation tasks will scale proportionally.

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE wins in single-thread performance as measured by Passmark (5.3% ahead), and it has a notable edge in extended instructions (11.2% ahead). This makes it suitable for workloads that rely on specialized SIMD or encryption-related instruction paths. The AMD chip's higher memory bandwidth (83.2 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s) could also benefit memory-bound tasks, though no direct memory bandwidth benchmark appears in the recorded tests.

For low-power scenarios, the AMD chip's 35 W TDP versus Intel's 45 W TDP gives it a thermal efficiency advantage, though the database does not include power consumption measurements. The AMD part's mobile segment classification and unlocked multiplier suggest flexibility for tuned low-power builds. The Intel part's desktop classification and locked multiplier indicate a more fixed operating point.

The average benchmark scores reflect the overall performance hierarchy. The Intel chip records an average of 32,924 across all benchmarks, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The AMD chip averages 27,712, placing it in the 79th percentile. The Intel part's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12700 (delta -0.1%), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (delta 0.3%), AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (delta -0.5%), and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (delta -0.5%). The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE's nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (delta 0.3%), Intel Core i5-12600KF (delta -0.3%), AMD Ryzen 7 5700X (delta 0.5%), and Intel Core i5-12600K (delta 0.5%).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 3,070 in Cinebench R23 singlecore, which is 17.5% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE's 2,532.

Q: Does the AMD chip win any benchmark tests?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE wins three tests: Passmark single-thread (3,914 versus 3,718, a 5.3% lead), Passmark singlethread (same result), and Passmark extended instructions (17,962 versus 16,146, an 11.2% lead).

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel part has 33% more threads.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gap is in Passmark find prime numbers, where the Intel chip leads by 49.7% (157 versus 79). The physics test shows a 47.7% gap (2,199 versus 1,150).

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE and the Intel Core 5 213PTE have ECC memory support recorded in the database.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD chip supports DDR5 only. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates that the Intel Core 5 213PTE is the stronger processor for most workloads. It wins 14 of 17 recorded tests, with particularly large margins in floating point math (45.5%), physics (47.7%), and prime number finding (49.7%). Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration with 24 MB of L3 cache provides a structural advantage that shows up consistently across Cinebench versions and Passmark compute tests.

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE is not without merits. Its 5.3% single-thread Passmark win and 11.2% extended instructions win indicate that it holds its own in specific scenarios. The lower 35 W TDP and higher memory bandwidth (83.2 GB/s) make it an interesting option for power-sensitive builds. The unlocked multiplier adds flexibility for users who want to tune performance.

For buyers prioritizing raw compute throughput, rendering, physics simulation, or integer-heavy tasks, the Intel Core 5 213PTE is the data-backed choice. Its average benchmark score of 32,924 places it at the 83rd percentile, while the AMD part sits at the 79th percentile with an average of 27,712. The Intel chip's launch MSRP is $221. For users who value single-thread Passmark performance, extended instruction throughput, lower TDP, or the ability to overclock, the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE offers a distinct alternative, though its overall benchmark record trails significantly.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 8500GE
5 213PTE
Core Specs
Cores
6
8 +33.3%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.4
2.1 -38.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3.4
2.1 -38.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Multiplier
34
21 -38.2%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
35
45 +28.6%
PL1
—
45 W
PL2
—
219 W
PPT
47 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
—
Codename
Phoenix2
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Phoenix))
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
20,900 million
—
Die Size
137 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
—
E-Core Frequency
3.1 GHz up to 3.7 GHz
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 740M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$221
Part Number
100-000001495
SA4QM
Package
FC-LGA1718
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
Wraith Stealth
—
View Ryzen 5 8500GE Details View Core 5 213PTE Details