CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

CORE STATE Phoenix

CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 4.2 Base / 4.7 GHz Turbo

CACHE 16 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 65W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Atom x7809C

CORE STATE Amston Lake

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 8 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 3.6 GHz Turbo

CACHE 6 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 25W

ARCHITECTURE Amston Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_16_threads

6,091

N/A

3dmark_2_threads

1,874

N/A

3dmark_4_threads

3,563

N/A

3dmark_8_threads

5,275

N/A

3dmark_max_threads

6,165

N/A

3dmark_single_thread

951

N/A

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

2,101

805

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

296

113

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

8,757

3,358

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

1,236

474

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

20,851

7,997

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

2,943

1,129

passmark_data_compression

288,158

111,525

passmark_data_encryption

16,646

7,832

passmark_extended_instructions

22,175

5,509

passmark_find_prime_numbers

passmark_floating_point_math

46,217

17,856

passmark_integer_math

74,021

28,946

passmark_multithread

24,389

9,409

passmark_physics

1,332

686

passmark_random_string_sorting

34,604

15,728

passmark_single_thread

3,685

1,462

passmark_singlethread

3,685

1,462

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F vs Intel Atom x7809C

Examining the test numbers for Ryzen 5 8400F (AMD) and Intel Intel Atom x7809C CPU, a pattern of close performance develops. Neither chip wins repeatedly in all benchmarks. This alternating of wins indicates inherent parity. Consumers confront a actual decision here. Each CPUs provide capable throughput.

Game performance benchmarks similarly indicate similar numbers between Ryzen 5 8400F (AMD) and Intel Intel Atom x7809C CPU. Frame rates deltas often fall below margin of error. This small gaps are seldom detectable during everyday gaming sessions. Both processors provide smooth experiences. Gaming enthusiasts should select confidently between the options.

Finally, builders should pick based on availability as opposed to raw performance alone. Both Ryzen 5 8400F (AMD) and Intel Intel Atom x7809C CPU offer strong results for their respective categories. This determination rests on individual needs. Both option is reasonable. Buyers shouldn't go wrong with these options.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

5 8400F

Atom x7809C

Core Specs

Cores

8 +33.3%

Threads

8 -33.3%

Base Clock (GHz)

4.2

2 -52.4%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.7

3.6 -23.4%

Frequency (GHz)

4.2

2 -52.4%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.7

3.6 -23.4%

Multiplier

20 -52.4%

SMP CPUs

1 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

96 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per module)

L3 Cache

16 MB (shared)

6 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

25 -61.5%

PPT

61-88 W

—

Configurable TDP

45 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Amston Lake

Codename

Phoenix

Amston Lake

Generation

Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Phoenix))

Atom (Gracemont)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

25,000 million

—

Die Size

178 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Dual-channel

Single-channel

Memory Bandwidth

83.2 GB/s

38.4 GB/s

ECC Memory

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket AM5

Intel BGA 1264

Chipsets

X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620

—

PCIe

Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 3, 9 Lanes(CPU only)

Other

Market

Desktop

Mobile

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$170

$117

Part Number

100-000001591

SRNEN

Package

FC-LGA1718

FC-BGA16F

Tj Max

95°C

105°C

View Ryzen 5 8400F Details View Atom x7809C Details

CPU Comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

Atom x7809C

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F vs Intel Atom x7809C

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Processors

Related Comparisons