AMD Ryzen 5 7500F vs AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS and AMD Ryzen 5 7500F represent two fundamentally different approaches to the same performance tier. The data is clear: the desktop-oriented Ryzen 5 7500F dominates in most benchmarks, winning 17 of 23 head-to-head tests, while the mobile Ryzen 7 7735HS secures six wins, primarily in multi-threaded and specialized workloads. The Ryzen 5 7500F is the superior choice for users who prioritize raw compute power, single-thread speed, and modern platform features. Conversely, the Ryzen 7 7735HS is the pick for those who need an integrated GPU, lower power consumption, and competitive performance in specific multi-threaded tasks, all within a mobile form factor.

The Verdict

The benchmark data dictates a clear split. Pick the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F if you are building a desktop and demand maximum performance. It is decisively ahead in almost every CPU-intensive task, often by massive margins. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799 is 73.9% higher than the 7735HS’s 13106, and its single-core score of 3218 is more than double the 1546 of the mobile chip. This is a processor for users who want top-tier compute for gaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking.

Pick the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS if you need a mobile processor with an integrated GPU. It is the only one of the two with any graphics capability, featuring the Radeon 680M. The data shows it wins in PassMark integer math (85309 vs 79108) and floating-point math (47865 vs 47176), indicating strong raw compute in those specific areas. Its 35W TDP also makes it suitable for thin-and-light laptops where power efficiency is paramount. While it loses many benchmarks, it is not a slouch; it holds its own in 3DMark multi-threaded tests, winning the 16-thread and 8-thread tests by 7.7% and 6%, respectively.

For a desktop user, the choice is the 7500F. For a laptop user, the 7735HS is the only option presented. The 7500F’s average benchmark score of 24964 is nearly identical to the 7735HS’s 25147, but the distribution of wins heavily favors the desktop chip, making it the better performer for most tasks.

Architecture Differences

The two CPUs are built on different architectures and for different platforms. The Ryzen 7 7735HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture (codenamed Rembrandt-R) on a 6 nm process, while the Ryzen 5 7500F uses the newer Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael) on a 5 nm process. This generational gap explains the 7500F's superior single-core performance.

The core configurations differ significantly. The 7735HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the 7500F has 6 cores and 12 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the 7500F wins in multi-threaded workloads like Cinebench R23, demonstrating the efficiency of the Zen 4 architecture. The 7500F also features a larger L2 cache of 1 MB per core (vs 512 KB) and 32 MB of shared L3 cache (vs 16 MB), which contributes to its better performance in many tasks.

The platforms are entirely distinct. The 7735HS uses AMD Socket FP7 and supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the 7500F uses AMD Socket AM5 with PCIe Gen 5 and 24 lanes. The 7500F has a higher base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz, compared to the 7735HS's 3.20 GHz base and 4.75 GHz boost. The 7500F has a higher TDP of 65W versus 35W, reflecting its desktop orientation.

Memory support is similar, with both supporting DDR5 and dual-channel memory. However, the 7500F offers higher memory bandwidth at 83.2 GB/s compared to 76.8 GB/s for the 7735HS. Both support ECC memory. The 7500F has a multiplier unlocked, making it overclockable, while the 7735HS is locked. The most notable feature difference is the integrated Radeon 680M graphics on the 7735HS, which is absent on the 7500F. The 7500F also has a smaller die size at 71 mm² with 6,570 million transistors, while the 7735HS has a 210 mm² die.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 7500F wins decisively in single-thread and lightly-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score is 3218, a 108.2% advantage over the 7735HS. This leads to wins in 3DMark single-thread (974 vs 912) and 2-thread tests (1902 vs 1773). The 7500F also dominates in physics simulations, scoring 1788 in PassMark physics vs 1073 for the 7735HS, a 66.6% lead. It is the clear winner for gaming and applications that rely on high-frequency single-core performance.

The Ryzen 7 7735HS wins in specific multi-threaded and math-heavy scenarios. It wins 3DMark 8-thread (5697 vs 5372) and 16-thread (6870 vs 6376) tests, suggesting better scaling in certain multi-core workloads. It also wins PassMark integer math (85309 vs 79108) and floating-point math (47865 vs 47176), indicating an edge in pure arithmetic operations. Its PassMark data encryption score of 18237 is 4.2% higher than the 7500F's 17510, showing strength in cryptographic tasks.

The 7500F wins in almost all other categories. It leads in Cinebench R15 multi-core (2298 vs 2153.4) and single-core (324 vs 248), Geekbench multi-core (12362 vs 8114) and single-core (2374 vs 1699), and PassMark multithread (26825 vs 23166). The 7500F also wins in data compression (305925 vs 293278), extended instructions (22776 vs 20050), find prime numbers (199 vs 59), and random string sorting (36191 vs 30388). The 7735HS’s wins are narrower in percentage terms, while the 7500F’s are often massive, such as the 70.4% lead in prime number finding.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in single-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is significantly faster. It scores 3218 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is 52% higher than the Ryzen 7 7735HS’s 1546. This trend holds in Geekbench single-core, where the 7500F scores 2374 vs 1699.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 7735HS have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7735HS features the Radeon 680M integrated GPU. The Ryzen 5 7500F has no integrated graphics, so it requires a discrete GPU for display output.

Q: Which processor is better for multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F wins most multi-threaded tests despite having fewer cores. It scores 22799 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, a 73.9% lead over the 7735HS’s 13106. However, the 7735HS wins in 3DMark 8-thread and 16-thread tests.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each CPU?

A: The Ryzen 7 7735HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Ryzen 5 7500F has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which CPU has a higher clock speed?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has higher clock speeds, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Ryzen 7 7735HS has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.75 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The Ryzen 7 7735HS has a TDP of 35W, while the Ryzen 5 7500F has a TDP of 65W. This reflects the mobile vs desktop design philosophy.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking difference is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Ryzen 5 7500F scores 22799 versus 13106 for the 7735HS, a 42.5% delta. This is the single largest performance gap in the entire dataset and highlights the architectural advantage of Zen 4. In single-core, the 7500F’s 3218 score is 52% higher than the 1546 of the 7735HS, reinforcing its dominance in lightly-threaded tasks.

The 7500F also wins decisively in Geekbench, scoring 12362 in multi-core (34.4% higher) and 2374 in single-core (28.4% higher). In Cinebench R15, the 7500F wins both multi-core (2298 vs 2153.4) and single-core (324 vs 248), with the latter a 23.5% margin. PassMark physics shows a 40% lead for the 7500F (1788 vs 1073), and PassMark multithread shows a 13.6% lead (26825 vs 23166).

The Ryzen 7 7735HS’s victories are narrower but notable. In 3DMark 16-thread, it scores 6870 vs 6376, a 7.7% win. It also wins 3DMark 8-thread (5697 vs 5372, a 6% delta) and 3DMark max-threads (6872 vs 6379, 7.7%). In PassMark, it wins integer math (85309 vs 79108, a 7.8% lead) and floating-point math (47865 vs 47176, a 1.5% lead). It also edges out the 7500F in data encryption (18237 vs 17510, a 4.2% lead).

The 7500F wins the remaining tests, including PassMark single-thread (3841 vs 3296, a 14.2% lead), extended instructions (22776 vs 20050, 12%), random string sorting (36191 vs 30388, 16%), data compression (305925 vs 293278, 4.1%), and find prime numbers (199 vs 59, a massive 70.4% lead). The data is unambiguous: the 7500F is the faster processor in the vast majority of scenarios, with the 7735HS only winning in specific multi-threaded scaling tests and specialized math workloads.