AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS vs Intel Core i3-13100TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS scores 3122 on average, while the Intel Core i3-13100TE scores 3111. The AMD part leads by 0.4% according to its nearestRivals data, though the Intel part's nearestRivals data shows the opposite delta of -0.3%.

Q: How do the two CPUs compare in multi-core Cinebench R23 performance?

A: The Intel Core i3-13100TE wins this test with a score of 10054, beating the AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS's 9131. That is a 9.2% advantage for Intel in this specific workload.

Q: Which processor wins the most head-to-head benchmark comparisons?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS wins 3 out of 4 head-to-head tests. It takes Cinebench R15 multicore, R15 singlecore, and R23 singlecore, while Intel wins only Cinebench R23 multicore.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i3-13100TE has 4 cores and 8 threads. AMD offers 50% more cores and threads.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core i3-13100TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, though its memory bandwidth figure is not listed.

Q: Which processor has ECC memory support?

A: The Intel Core i3-13100TE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS does not support ECC memory. This is a notable feature difference for error-sensitive workloads.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS is built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt, and manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its die size is 208 mm². The Intel Core i3-13100TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S, on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 163 mm².

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. The AMD processor uses 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a shared 16 MB L3 cache. The Intel processor has 80 KB of L1 per core and a much larger 1.25 MB of L2 per core, but a smaller shared L3 at 12 MB. This means Intel's per-core L2 is 2.4x larger, while AMD's total L3 is 33% larger.

The integrated graphics also differ: AMD pairs the CPU with Radeon 660M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part is a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. The AMD chip supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while Intel supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both have a 35 W TDP.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS is the clear winner in older Cinebench R15 workloads. It scores 1656 in multicore versus Intel's 1013 (a 63.5% advantage) and 235 in singlecore versus Intel's 142 (a 65.5% advantage). This suggests AMD's architecture handles legacy rendering workloads with far greater efficiency.

In Cinebench R23 singlecore, AMD still leads, but by a much smaller margin. The AMD scores 1465 against Intel's 1419, a 3.2% edge. This indicates that in current-generation single-threaded tasks, the two are closely matched, with AMD holding a slight advantage.

The Intel Core i3-13100TE wins decisively in Cinebench R23 multicore. Its score of 10054 beats AMD's 9131 by 9.2%. This is notable because Intel achieves this with only 4 cores and 8 threads, versus AMD's 6 cores and 12 threads. The Raptor Lake architecture's efficiency in this specific test outweighs AMD's core-count advantage.

For real-world use, the AMD chip is better suited to workloads that rely on Cinebench R15-style performance, while the Intel chip excels in the more modern R23 multi-threaded test. The AMD processor also has a higher boost clock of 4.50 GHz versus Intel's 4.10 GHz, which helps explain its singlecore wins.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | Intel Core i3-13100TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 4 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.10 GHz |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Raptor Lake |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Die Size | 208 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | Not listed | 2023-01-03 |

The base clock difference is substantial: AMD starts at 3.30 GHz, while Intel starts at 2.40 GHz. The AMD part also boosts 400 MHz higher. Intel offers ECC memory support, which AMD lacks, and supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving platform flexibility. AMD's PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes contrasts with Intel's Gen 5 with 16 lanes — a trade-off between bandwidth and lane count. Intel's release date is listed as January 3, 2023, while AMD's is not specified.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench R15 multicore test shows the largest gap. AMD scores 1656 against Intel's 1013, a 63.5% advantage. This is a massive difference — more than one and a half times the Intel result. Similarly, in Cinebench R15 singlecore, AMD scores 235 versus 142, a 65.5% lead. These are the two most lopsided results in the comparison.

Cinebench R23 multicore flips the script. Intel scores 10054, while AMD scores 9131. Intel wins by 9.2%. The deltaPct of -9.2 indicates AMD's loss. This is the only test where Intel comes out ahead, but it is a modern and widely used benchmark, giving it significant weight.

Cinebench R23 singlecore is the closest contest. AMD scores 1465, Intel scores 1419, and AMD wins by 3.2%. This narrow margin shows that in current-generation single-threaded tasks, the two are nearly equivalent. The AMD's higher boost clock of 4.50 GHz likely contributes to this edge.

The overall win count stands at 3 for AMD and 1 for Intel. However, the single Intel win is in the most demanding multi-threaded test. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical — 3122 for AMD and 3111 for Intel — which is a difference of only 0.4% in AMD's favor. The nearestRivals data confirms these two are effectively peers in aggregate performance, with the AMD Ryzen 3 5425U (3124) and AMD Ryzen 5 5625U (3096) also clustering in the same performance band.

The Verdict

The data presents a split decision. The AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS wins 3 of 4 head-to-head tests, including both Cinebench R15 results and Cinebench R23 singlecore. Its 65.5% singlecore lead in R15 is staggering, and its 3.2% edge in R23 singlecore shows it holds up in modern single-threaded work. The AMD also offers 6 cores and 12 threads, giving it a structural advantage in heavily threaded applications that scale beyond 4 cores.

The Intel Core i3-13100TE wins the one test that matters most for modern multi-core rendering: Cinebench R23 multicore. Its 9.2% victory here is significant because it achieves this with fewer cores and threads. This suggests Intel's Raptor Lake architecture extracts more performance per core in this workload. The Intel part also adds ECC memory support and DDR4 compatibility, which could matter for specific use cases.

For a mobile user prioritizing single-threaded responsiveness and legacy benchmark performance, the AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS is the stronger choice. Its 4.50 GHz boost clock and 12 threads give it versatility. For a desktop user running modern multi-threaded workloads, particularly those that resemble Cinebench R23, the Intel Core i3-13100TE delivers better raw performance despite its smaller core count.

Both processors sit at the 52nd percentile versus all CPUs, and their average benchmark scores differ by less than half a percent. Benchmark results indicate that neither is a decisive overall winner — the choice depends on which workload profile matters more. AMD wins the majority of tests, but Intel wins the most modern multi-core test by a wide margin. The practical advice: pick AMD for single-threaded and legacy performance, pick Intel for current-generation multi-threaded rendering.