AMD Ryzen 5 5625U vs Intel Core i7-11375H Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 5625U

CORE STATE Barcelo
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.3 Base / 4.3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 15W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-11375H

CORE STATE Tiger Lake-H
CORE SPECS 4 Cores / 8 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Tiger Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,447
985
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
223
138
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
8,290
9,775
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,379
1,380
geekbench_multicore
5,718
5,383
geekbench_singlecore
1,521
1,800
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
4,105
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
579

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 5625U vs Intel Core i7-11375H

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data splits exactly evenly between the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U and the Intel Core i7-11375H, with each processor taking three benchmark wins. The two chips trade blows so consistently that the overall picture depends heavily on which workload and which benchmark generation you trust.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5625U dominates the older Cinebench R15 tests. In multicore, it scores 1447 against Intel's 985, a 46.9% advantage. The single-core R15 result is even more lopsided: AMD scores 223 versus Intel's 138, a 61.6% margin. These are enormous gaps, and they suggest that in R15's workload, the Ryzen's six cores and twelve threads simply overwhelm the Intel part's four cores and eight threads.

But flip to Cinebench R23 and the story reverses. The Intel Core i7-11375H scores 9775 in multicore, beating AMD's 8290 by 15.2%. This is a stark turnaround: the same core-count disadvantage that hurt Intel in R15 becomes a non-factor in R23, where Intel's higher boost clocks and newer architecture pull ahead. The single-core R23 result is essentially a tie: Intel scores 1380, AMD scores 1379, a 0.1% difference that is statistically meaningless.

Geekbench splits the difference. AMD wins the multicore test with 5718 against Intel's 5383, a 6.2% margin. Intel wins the single-core test with 1800 against AMD's 1521, a 15.5% margin. The single-core Geekbench result is Intel's second-largest win after the R15 single-core blowout, while AMD's Geekbench multicore win is modest but real.

The average benchmark score puts AMD slightly ahead: 3096 versus 3018. Both chips land at the 52nd percentile among all CPUs in the database, meaning they sit in the same performance tier overall. The nearest rivals for AMD include the Intel Xeon W-2133 at 3087 (0.3% behind) and the Intel Core i3-13100TE at 3111 (0.5% ahead). For Intel, the nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 5600U at 3053 (1.1% ahead) and the Intel Xeon E-2334 at 2988 (1% behind).

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 5625U is built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Barcelo, and belongs to the 5000 series generation. It uses a 7 nm process from TSMC with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The Intel Core i7-11375H uses the Tiger Lake architecture, specifically Tiger Lake-H, and belongs to the Core 11th Gen family. It is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a smaller 146.1 mm² die, though the database does not record a transistor count for comparison.

Core configuration differs substantially. AMD provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while Intel provides 4 cores and 8 threads. This two-core advantage is the primary reason AMD wins the multicore tests where thread scaling is efficient. However, Intel's base clock of 3.00 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz both exceed AMD's 2.30 GHz base and 4.30 GHz boost. The 0.70 GHz higher boost clock helps Intel in single-threaded tests and in R23's multicore workload, which appears to scale differently than R15.

Cache layouts reflect the different core counts. AMD offers 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Intel offers 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. Intel's larger per-core L1 and L2 caches give each individual core more local memory, while AMD's larger shared L3 pool benefits its six-core design.

Power targets differ substantially. AMD is rated at 15 W TDP, while Intel is rated at 28 W TDP. This 13 W difference means Intel is designed to draw more power and generate more heat, which helps explain its higher clock speeds. The trade-off is efficiency: AMD achieves comparable average benchmark scores at nearly half the power envelope.

Memory support is similar on paper: both use DDR4 with dual-channel buses and 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. AMD supports ECC memory, Intel does not. PCIe capabilities differ: AMD provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while Intel provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). Intel's newer PCIe standard offers double the bandwidth per lane.

Integrated graphics differ as well. AMD uses Radeon Vega 7, while Intel uses Iris XE 96EU. The database does not include graphics benchmarks, so the performance implications remain qualitative. Both processors use mobile sockets: AMD Socket FP6 for AMD, Intel BGA 1449 for Intel. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 5625U wins in scenarios that favor many cores and threads. Its 6-core, 12-thread configuration delivers a 46.9% advantage in Cinebench R15 multicore and a 6.2% advantage in Geekbench multicore. The Ryzen also wins the R15 single-core test by a massive 61.6%, which is curious given Intel's higher boost clock, but the R15 single-core workload appears to reward AMD's architecture more than raw clock speed.

The Intel Core i7-11375H wins in scenarios that favor high clock speeds and newer instruction sets. Its 5.00 GHz boost clock drives a 15.2% win in Cinebench R23 multicore, despite having two fewer cores. The single-core R23 result is a dead heat, but Intel wins Geekbench single-core by 15.5%. The R23 results suggest that Intel's architecture handles sustained multicore loads better than R15 would imply, possibly due to better thermal management at its 28 W TDP.

For real-world use, the split suggests different profiles. The AMD chip is better suited to lightly threaded legacy benchmarks and moderately threaded productivity tasks where its extra cores can engage. The Intel chip is better suited to newer workloads that leverage its higher clocks and Gen 4 PCIe connectivity, particularly if the workload involves frequent single-threaded operations or benefits from newer instruction sets.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5625U has an average benchmark score of 3096, compared to 3018 for the Intel Core i7-11375H. AMD leads by 78 points, roughly 2.6%.

Q: How do the two chips compare in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The Intel Core i7-11375H wins decisively, scoring 9775 against AMD's 8290, a 15.2% advantage. This is Intel's largest multicore win despite having only 4 cores versus AMD's 6 cores.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-11375H boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U boosts to 4.30 GHz. Intel's boost clock is 0.70 GHz higher.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 5625U supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i7-11375H does not. Both use DDR4 with dual-channel memory buses and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5625U is rated at 15 W TDP, while the Intel Core i7-11375H is rated at 28 W TDP. Intel's TDP is 13 W higher.

Q: How close is the single-core Cinebench R23 result?

A: It is essentially a tie. Intel scores 1380 and AMD scores 1379, a difference of 0.1%. This is the closest result in the entire head-to-head comparison.

The Verdict

The data supports two distinct buyer profiles. The AMD Ryzen 5 5625U is the choice for users who prioritize multicore throughput in older benchmark workloads and value efficiency. Its 15 W TDP, combined with a 46.9% lead in R15 multicore and a 6.2% lead in Geekbench multicore, makes it the stronger option for sustained multi-threaded productivity on battery-powered systems. The ECC memory support also gives it an edge for reliability-sensitive tasks.

The Intel Core i7-11375H is the choice for users who prioritize single-threaded performance and newer PCIe connectivity. Its 15.5% Geekbench single-core lead and 15.2% R23 multicore lead show that its 5.00 GHz boost clock delivers real advantages in modern workloads. The Gen 4 PCIe with 20 lanes is a significant upgrade over AMD's Gen 3 with 16 lanes, potentially benefiting external GPU or high-speed storage configurations.

The 52nd percentile ranking for both chips indicates they occupy the same performance tier in the database. The average benchmark scores are close: 3096 for AMD versus 3018 for Intel. The deciding factors are workload type and power budget. For raw multicore grunt in older tests and lower power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U wins. For newer benchmarks, higher single-thread performance, and faster I/O, the Intel Core i7-11375H is the better pick. The Intel chip also carries a recorded launch MSRP of $482, which can be noted for reference.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 5625U | Intel Core i7-11375H |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 4 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.30 GHz | 3.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 28 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP6 | Intel BGA 1449 |

| Architecture | Zen 3 | Tiger Lake |

| Codename | Barcelo | Tiger Lake-H |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 180 mm² | 146.1 mm² |

| Transistors | 10,700 million | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 | Iris XE 96EU |

| Release Date | 2022-01-05 | 2021-01-10 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $482 |

| Part Number | 100-000000583 | SRKH4 |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 5625U
i7-11375H
Core Specs
Cores
6
4 -33.3%
Threads
12
8 -33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.3
3 +30.4%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.3
5 +16.3%
Frequency (GHz)
2.3
3 +30.4%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.3
5 +16.3%
Multiplier
23
30 +30.4%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
12 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
15
28 +86.7%
Configurable TDP
25W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3
Tiger Lake
Codename
Barcelo
Tiger Lake-H
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 3 (Cezanne))
Core i7 (Tiger Lake-H)
Process Size
7 nm
10 nm
Transistors
10,700 million
—
Die Size
180 mm²
146.1 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
51.2 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP6
Intel BGA 1449
Chipsets
—
QM580, HM570, WM590
PCIe
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Vega 7
Iris XE 96EU
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$482
Part Number
100-000000583
SRKH4
Package
FC-BGA1140
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
View Ryzen 5 5625U Details View Core i7-11375H Details