AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE vs Intel Core Ultra X7 368H Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE
Core Ultra X7 368H
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE vs Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
The Verdict
The database comparison between the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE and the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is a study in contrasting priorities. The AMD part is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the mature Zen 3 architecture, aimed at efficiency-focused desktop builds. The Intel part is a 16-core, 16-thread mobile processor using the newer Panther Lake architecture, designed for high-performance laptops. The recorded data shows the Intel chip holds a decisive advantage in every measured benchmark, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD chip sits at the 50th percentile. For anyone prioritizing raw compute throughput, the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is the clear choice. For those committed to a desktop AM4 platform with lower power draw, the Ryzen 5 5605GE remains a functional, albeit far less powerful, option. The data does not support choosing the AMD chip for performance reasons; its only advantages are its desktop socket, unlocked multiplier, and lower core count, which may appeal to specific system builders with legacy AM4 motherboards.
Where Each One Wins
The benchmark results are one-sided. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H wins 100% of the head-to-head comparisons in this database. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has no recorded benchmark wins over the Intel part. The Intel chip’s wins are comprehensive, spanning single-threaded, multi-threaded, and specialized instruction workloads. The AMD chip’s practical advantages are not in speed but in platform compatibility: it uses the AMD Socket AM4, which is a desktop standard, and it has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The Intel part, conversely, is a mobile BGA 2540 package with a locked multiplier. The data indicates the Intel part is the only one of the two that delivers competitive scores in both productivity and compute-heavy tasks, while the AMD part is best suited for a system where the motherboard and socket are already predetermined.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different architectural eras and target different market segments. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE is built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename, using a 7 nm process from TSMC. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, a base clock of 3.40 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its thermal design power is 35 W. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H uses the Panther Lake architecture, specifically Panther Lake-H, built on Intel’s own 3 nm process. It has 16 cores and 16 threads, a base clock of 2.00 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a thermal design power of just 25 W. The Intel chip also uses a newer memory standard, LPDDR5X, versus the AMD chip’s DDR4, and it supports PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes, whereas the AMD chip supports PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. The cache structures also differ significantly: the AMD chip has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB L3. The Intel chip has 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. The Intel part also integrates a different graphics solution, the Arc B390, compared to the AMD Radeon Vega 7. These architectural differences explain the performance gap, as the Intel part has more than double the cores and a newer process node.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has 6 cores and 12 threads.
Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE boosts to 4.40 GHz. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H boosts to 5.00 GHz.
Q: Which processor has a higher thermal design power?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has a 35 W TDP. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H has a lower 25 W TDP.
Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?
A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H does not.
Q: Which processor supports faster memory bandwidth?
A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H supports LPDDR5X with a memory bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE supports DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s.
Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor?
A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE is in the 50th percentile.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded benchmark data for the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H shows a substantial lead over the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE in every test category, although the AMD chip has no recorded scores in this database. The Intel chip’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 28221, and its single-core score is 3984. In Cinebench R20, it scores 11852 multi-core and 1673 single-core. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2844 multi-core and 401 single-core. The PassMark suite further confirms this dominance: the Intel chip scores 32956 in multi-thread tests and 4005 in single-thread tests. Its floating-point math score is 105681, integer math is 88083, and extended instructions score is 25669. Data compression yields 312927, and data encryption yields 25228. The random string sorting score is 38093, and the physics score is 2857. Prime number finding scores 321. These figures place the Intel chip close to its nearest rivals in the database: the Intel Core 7 253PE with an average score of 40557 and a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core 5 223PE with 40585 and a delta of -0.2%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H with 40431 and a delta of 0.2%. The Intel Xeon 6507P also sits nearby with 40426 and a delta of 0.2%. This means the Core Ultra X7 368H is effectively tied with those processors in overall average score, sitting at 40518, which is within 0.2% of all of them. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE, with no recorded benchmarks, cannot be compared on a per-test basis, but its 50th percentile ranking and lack of any wins in the head-to-head table indicate it falls far behind the Intel part’s 87th percentile standing.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ across nearly every specification field in the database. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE belongs to the 5000 series, while the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H belongs to the Core Ultra Series 3. The AMD chip uses the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename, whereas the Intel chip uses Panther Lake. The process nodes are different: 7 nm for AMD versus 3 nm for Intel. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads; the Intel chip has 16 cores and 16 threads. The base clocks are 3.40 GHz for AMD and 2.00 GHz for Intel, while boost clocks are 4.40 GHz and 5.00 GHz, respectively. The TDP is 35 W for AMD and 25 W for Intel. The AMD chip uses the AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel chip uses Intel BGA 2540. The AMD chip’s cache includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB L3. The Intel chip’s cache includes 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3. Memory support differs: the AMD chip uses DDR4 with dual-channel and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel chip uses LPDDR5X with dual-channel and 153.6 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD chip has PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes, whereas the Intel chip has PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes. Integrated graphics are the Radeon Vega 7 for AMD and the Arc B390 for Intel. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel chip is locked. The AMD chip has a transistor count of 10,700 million and a die size of 180 mm², while the Intel chip has no recorded transistor or die size data. The AMD chip is a desktop part, and the Intel chip is a mobile part. The release dates are also distinct, with the AMD chip launching in February 2025 and the Intel chip in January 2026. Both processors are listed as active in production, and neither has a recorded launch MSRP in the database.