AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE vs Intel Core Ultra 7 366H Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE and Intel Core Ultra 7 366H occupy different corners of the processor market: one is a 6-core desktop part on AMD Socket AM4, the other a 16-core mobile part on Intel BGA 2540. The database records no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pair, and the AMD side has no recorded benchmark scores. All measured performance data in this comparison therefore comes from the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pairing, and the win counter shows 0 for both sides. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has an empty benchmark list and an average benchmark score of 0, so there are no Cinebench or PassMark results to place against the Intel part. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H is the only side with measured results.

Its average benchmark score is 41263, which places it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, it records 28477 multi-core and 4020 single-core. In Cinebench R20, it records 11960 multi-core and 1688 single-core. In Cinebench R15, it records 2870 multi-core and 405 single-core.

PassMark results for the Intel part include multithread 33429, single-thread 4043, integer math 83695, floating point math 103615, data compression 327455, data encryption 25845, extended instructions 26901, find prime numbers 326, physics 2880, and random string sorting 39814.

The nearest-rival data gives the Intel part a narrow average-score position. It is 0.1% above the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, which scores 41215, and 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440, which scores 41208. It is 0.7% above the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, which scores 40967. It is 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, which scores 41376. Because the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has no average score, no percentage margin can be calculated between the two CPUs in this comparison.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different foundries and process nodes. AMD uses TSMC's 7 nm process, with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. Intel uses its own 3 nm process; transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database. AMD's architecture is Zen 3 under the codename Cezanne, part of the 5000 series. Intel's architecture is Panther Lake, listed as Core Ultra Series 3 and generation Ultra 7 Panther Lake-H.

The core topology differs. AMD provides 6 cores and 12 threads. Intel provides 16 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 3.40 for AMD and 2.00 for Intel. Boost clocks are 4.40 for AMD and 4.80 for Intel. The TDP figures are 35 for AMD and 25 for Intel.

Cache organization also differs. AMD uses 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB L3. Intel uses 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR4 for AMD and DDR5 plus LPDDR5X for Intel. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, but the bandwidth figures are 51.2 GB/s for AMD and 115.2 GB/s for Intel.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation and lane count. AMD lists PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes, CPU only. Intel lists PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes, CPU only. Integrated graphics are Radeon Vega 7 on the AMD part and Intel Xe3 Graphics on the Intel part. The AMD part uses the desktop AM4 socket, while the Intel part uses the mobile BGA 2540 socket. The AMD multiplier is unlocked; the Intel multiplier is not. Release dates are 2025-02-23 for AMD and 2026-01-04 for Intel.

The Verdict

The recorded data is one-sided. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has a full Cinebench and PassMark record, an average benchmark score of 41263, and an 87th percentile standing. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has no benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile standing. For any conclusion based on measured performance, the Intel part is the only option supported by the database.

The AMD part has specification differences that are not reflected in benchmark results: a higher base clock, an unlocked multiplier, a desktop socket, and a larger PCIe lane count. Those differences do not produce a recorded win because no AMD benchmark data exists. The Intel part is the benchmark-backed candidate for measured multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. The AMD part remains a specification-only entry in this comparison.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE | Intel Core Ultra 7 366H |

|---|---|---|

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Series | 5000 series | Core Ultra Series 3 |

| Cores | 6 | 16 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.40 | 2.00 |

| Boost Clock | 4.40 | 4.80 |

| TDP | 35 | 25 |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel BGA 2540 |

| Architecture | Zen 3 | Panther Lake |

| Codename | Cezanne | Panther Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 3 (Cezanne)) | Ultra 7 (Panther Lake-H) |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 10,700 million | not recorded |

| Die Size | 180 mm² | not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 18 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 | Intel Xe3 Graphics |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2025-02-23 | 2026-01-04 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | true | false |

| Part Number | 100-000001804 | SA4R9Q9EL |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 41263 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 87 |

FAQ

Q: Does the database contain any benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE?

A: No. The AMD part has an empty benchmark list and an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile standing is 50.

Q: What are the highest recorded multi-core scores for the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H?

A: The Intel part records 28477 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 11960 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 2870 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. In PassMark multithread, it records 33429.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H compare with its nearest rivals in the database?

A: Its average score of 41263 is 0.1% above the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (41215) and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 (41208), 0.7% above the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (40967), and 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (41376).

Q: Which CPU has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has a boost clock of 4.80, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has a boost clock of 4.40. The AMD part has the higher base clock at 3.40 versus 2.00.

Q: Which CPU supports DDR5 memory?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE supports DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Are both processors multiplier-unlocked?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has an unlocked multiplier, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H does not.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H wins every recorded benchmark category in this comparison because the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has no recorded benchmark scores. The Intel part's largest recorded scores are in PassMark data compression (327455), PassMark floating point math (103615), PassMark integer math (83695), and Cinebench R23 multi-core (28477). Its single-core results are Cinebench R23 single-core 4020, Cinebench R20 single-core 1688, Cinebench R15 single-core 405, and PassMark single-thread 4043.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has no measured wins, but it does lead in specification categories. Its base clock of 3.40 is higher than the Intel part's 2.00. Its multiplier is unlocked, while the Intel multiplier is locked. It uses the desktop AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel part uses mobile BGA 2540. It also lists 16 PCIe lanes versus Intel's 12, though Intel's lanes are PCIe Gen 5 and AMD's are PCIe Gen 3.

For use-case splitting based on recorded data, the Intel part is the only one with benchmark evidence in rendering, math, compression, encryption, and single-thread tests. The AMD part is the only one with desktop socket support, an unlocked multiplier, and a higher base clock, but no database score supports a performance win.