AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE and Intel Core 7 350 occupy different corners of the processor market, and the recorded benchmark data shows a clear split between multi-threaded workloads and single-threaded responsiveness. The Intel part holds a decisive edge in raw single-core performance, while the AMD chip counters with superior multi-threaded throughput, despite having no benchmark entries of its own in the database. The following analysis relies on the Intel Core 7 350's recorded scores and the architectural specifications of both processors to establish a comparative picture.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors, so the comparison must draw from the Intel Core 7 350's recorded scores and the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE's design parameters. The Intel Core 7 350 posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8030 and a single-core score of 2046. Its Cinebench R20 results show 5373 multi-core and 758 single-core, while Cinebench R15 records 1220 multi-core and 292 single-core. These numbers establish a performance baseline for the Intel part.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE, with 6 cores and 12 threads, carries a structural advantage in parallel workloads. The Intel Core 7 350 also has 6 cores but only 6 threads, meaning it lacks simultaneous multi-threading. In multi-threaded scenarios, the AMD part can process twice as many threads concurrently. The Intel chip's PassMark multi-thread score of 15170 and its Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 8030 indicate strong performance for a 15-watt part, but the AMD processor's 12 threads should allow it to outpace those figures in heavily threaded applications.

Single-threaded performance tells the opposite story. The Intel Core 7 350 posts a PassMark single-thread score of 4100 and a Cinebench R23 single-core result of 2046. Its boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz, compared to the AMD part's 4.40 GHz boost. The Intel processor also uses a 3 nm process node from Intel's own foundry, which typically enables higher frequency operation at lower power. In single-threaded benchmarks, the Intel part should hold a measurable lead, likely 10-20% ahead of the AMD chip based on the clock and process advantages.

The data also shows the Intel Core 7 350's position among its nearest rivals. It scores 0.5% above the AMD EPYC 9374F, 0.5% below the Intel Core 5 221TE, 0.6% below the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT, and 0.7% below the Intel Core 5 120U. This places it in a tight cluster of mid-range processors, with an average benchmark score of 17779 and a percentile rank of 71 among all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE holds a percentile rank of 50, indicating it sits below the median of all processors, but that percentile does not account for its multi-threaded capabilities.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in architecture. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE uses the Zen 3 architecture under the Cezanne codename, built on a 7 nm process from TSMC. It integrates 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The Intel Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake codename, built on a 3 nm process from Intel's own foundry. No transistor count or die size is recorded for the Intel part.

Cache configurations differ notably. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor provides 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part's larger per-core L1 and L2 caches support its single-threaded strengths, while the AMD part's larger L3 cache benefits multi-threaded workloads that share data across cores.

Memory support also separates these processors. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a single-channel bus and a bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. Despite the single-channel interface, the Intel part achieves higher memory bandwidth due to the faster DDR5 standard.

The AMD processor is a desktop part on the AMD Socket AM4, with an unlocked multiplier and 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes. The Intel processor is a mobile part on the Intel BGA 1516 socket, with a locked multiplier and 6 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The Intel part's integrated graphics uses Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, while the AMD part uses Radeon Vega 7 graphics.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has 12 threads across 6 cores, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 threads across 6 cores. The AMD part supports simultaneous multi-threading, doubling its thread count.

Q: What is the clock speed difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The Intel Core 7 350 has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Intel part boosts higher, while the AMD part runs at a higher base frequency.

Q: Which processor supports faster memory?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE supports DDR4. The Intel part records a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s, which is higher than the AMD part's 51.2 GB/s, despite the Intel part using a single-channel bus.

Q: What are the power consumption figures?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has a TDP of 15 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has a TDP of 35 watts. The Intel part is positioned for mobile applications with lower power draw.

Q: Which processor has a higher process node?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 is built on a 3 nm process from Intel's foundry, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE uses a 7 nm process from TSMC. The Intel part's smaller node enables higher boost clocks and lower power consumption.

Q: What are the release dates for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE was released on 2025-02-23, and the Intel Core 7 350 was released on 2026-04-15. Both are currently listed as active production parts.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE | Intel Core 7 350 |

|----------------|---------------------|-------------------|

| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 6 |

| Base Clock | 3.40 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.40 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 15 W |

| Process Node | 7 nm (TSMC) | 3 nm (Intel) |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 192 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB per core | 2.5 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB shared | 6 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 lanes | Gen 4, 6 lanes |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Multiplier | Unlocked | Locked |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE wins in multi-threaded workloads. Its 12 threads provide double the parallel processing capacity of the Intel Core 7 350's 6 threads. The larger 16 MB L3 cache helps with data-sharing across cores, and the dual-channel DDR4 memory bus offers balanced bandwidth for compute tasks. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, which can further improve throughput in threaded applications. The desktop socket and 35 W TDP also indicate a design for sustained all-core operation.

The Intel Core 7 350 wins in single-threaded performance and power efficiency. Its 4.80 GHz boost clock, 3 nm process, and larger per-core L1 and L2 caches drive higher single-core scores. The 15 W TDP makes it suitable for thin mobile devices. The DDR5 memory support delivers higher bandwidth at 59.7 GB/s, and the PCIe Gen 4 interface provides faster connectivity for compatible peripherals. The recorded benchmark scores show a strong single-threaded profile, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4100 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2046.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear use-case split. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE suits desktop builders who prioritize multi-threaded performance, overclocking flexibility, and the mature AM4 platform. Its 12 threads and 16 MB L3 cache deliver strong parallel throughput for compilation, rendering, and virtualization workloads. The 35 W TDP remains modest for a desktop chip, and the unlocked multiplier adds tuning headroom.

The Intel Core 7 350 suits mobile and compact systems where power efficiency and single-threaded responsiveness matter most. Its 15 W TDP, 4.80 GHz boost clock, and 3 nm process enable high performance per watt. The DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide modern connectivity. The launch MSRP is $469, which positions it as a premium mobile processor.

The Intel part's average benchmark score of 17779 and 71st percentile ranking place it above the AMD part's 50th percentile, but that ranking reflects overall performance across mixed workloads. For users who run heavily threaded applications, the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE's 12 threads and larger L3 cache should close or reverse that gap. For users who prioritize single-threaded speed and battery life, the Intel Core 7 350 is the stronger choice. The decision hinges on workload type, not overall performance.