AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT vs Intel Core 5 211E Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which CPU delivers the higher multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E scores 20389 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT scores 15848. The Intel part leads by 22.3% in this test.

Q: Are there any benchmark categories where the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT outperforms the Intel Core 5 211E?

A: Yes. The AMD chip wins in PassMark find prime numbers (54 vs 43, a 25.6% advantage) and PassMark physics (840 vs 702, a 19.7% advantage). These are the only two wins for AMD out of 17 head-to-head comparisons.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for these two desktop processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How do the single-core scores compare between the two CPUs?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E leads in every single-core test. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 2878 versus 2237 for the AMD, a 22.3% difference. In PassMark single-thread, the Intel scores 4006 versus 3066, a 23.5% lead.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT does not.

Q: What are the process nodes and memory types supported by each CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT uses a 7 nm process from TSMC and supports DDR4 memory. The Intel Core 5 211E uses a 10 nm process from Intel and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT is built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename, fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process. It contains 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The Intel Core 5 211E uses the Bartlett Lake codename, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². Intel does not list a transistor count in the database.

Cache layouts differ substantially. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip offers 80 KB of L1 per core, a much larger 2 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This larger cache hierarchy on the Intel side contributes to its performance advantage in memory-sensitive workloads.

Both CPUs are desktop parts with 65 W TDP ratings, but they use different sockets. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT fits AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel Core 5 211E uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, while the Intel part is locked.

Memory support diverges clearly. The AMD chip supports dual-channel DDR4 with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, with dual-channel memory bandwidth rated at 76.8 GB/s. This 25.6 GB/s bandwidth advantage helps the Intel part in bandwidth-sensitive tasks.

PCIe capabilities also differ. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core 5 211E provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This gives the Intel platform newer connectivity options for storage and expansion.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD chip includes Radeon Vega 7 graphics, while the Intel chip includes UHD Graphics 730. The database does not provide direct graphics benchmark comparisons, so the analysis focuses on CPU compute performance.

Release timing matters for platform choice. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT launched on 2024-01-07, while the Intel Core 5 211E launched on 2025-01-12. Both are listed as Active in production status.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 5 211E dominates the head-to-head benchmark results, winning 15 of 17 comparisons. The margin varies by workload type. The largest gap appears in PassMark floating point math, where Intel scores 66402 versus AMD's 36694, a 44.7% lead. This indicates a strong advantage in scientific and engineering workloads that rely on floating-point calculations.

In integer math, the Intel chip scores 88117 versus 64218 for AMD, a 27.1% advantage. Data compression shows a similar pattern: Intel scores 346757 versus 243904, a 29.7% lead. Random string sorting also favors Intel by 28.3%, with scores of 34308 versus 24583.

The Cinebench suite shows consistent 22.3% leads for Intel across all tests. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, Intel scores 2055 versus 1597. In R20 multi-core, Intel scores 8563 versus 6656. In R23 multi-core, Intel scores 20389 versus 15848. The single-core variants show the same 22.3% delta: R15 single-core 289 vs 225, R20 single-core 1208 vs 939, and R23 single-core 2878 vs 2237.

PassMark multithread favors Intel by 20.3%, with scores of 23833 versus 19000. Data encryption shows a 17.8% Intel lead, with 17938 versus 14754. Extended instructions also favor Intel by 21.1%, with 21592 versus 17027.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT wins two specific tests. In PassMark find prime numbers, AMD scores 54 versus 43 for Intel, a 25.6% advantage. In PassMark physics, AMD scores 840 versus 702, a 19.7% lead. These wins indicate that AMD's Zen 3 architecture handles certain mathematical operations and physics simulations more efficiently, despite the overall performance deficit.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT | Intel Core 5 211E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 10 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.60 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.40 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 10 nm |

| Die Size | 180 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Launch MSRP | $125 | $221 |

The base clock favors AMD at 3.60 GHz versus 2.70 GHz for Intel, but the boost clock favors Intel at 4.90 GHz versus 4.40 GHz. The Intel chip has a higher core count and thread count. The AMD chip has a smaller die and more advanced process node. The Intel chip supports newer memory and PCIe standards.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core 5 211E holds an 86th percentile ranking versus all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT sits at the 79th percentile. The average benchmark score confirms the gap: Intel averages 37829, while AMD averages 26748. This places the Intel chip roughly 41.4% higher in average score.

The Intel chip's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and the Intel Core i9-14901E, both with average scores near 37904 and 37911 respectively. The AMD chip's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-11900K and the AMD Ryzen 5 7545U, with average scores near 26639 and 26849. These comparisons show the Intel part competing in a higher performance tier.

For multi-threaded workloads, the Intel chip's 10 cores and 16 threads provide a 22.3% advantage in Cinebench R23 multi-core. The floating-point math advantage of 44.7% is particularly pronounced, making the Intel part the stronger choice for compute-heavy tasks like rendering, simulation, and data analysis.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT wins in find prime numbers and physics. These niche wins matter for specific mathematical workloads. However, the overall pattern is consistent: Intel leads in every Cinebench test and in 13 of 15 PassMark categories.

The Intel chip also offers newer platform features: PCIe Gen 5, DDR5 memory support, and ECC memory. The AMD chip offers a lower launch MSRP of $125 versus $221 for Intel, and an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The choice depends on whether the performance and platform advantages justify the higher cost.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 211E wins in almost every measurable CPU workload. It is the clear choice for multi-core rendering, video encoding, scientific computing, and data compression. The 44.7% lead in floating-point math makes it suitable for financial modeling, physics simulations, and engineering software. The 27.1% lead in integer math benefits database operations and general productivity. The 29.7% lead in data compression helps with archiving and file management tasks.

The Intel chip also wins in single-threaded performance by 22.3% to 23.5% across tests. This translates to faster application launches, snappier UI responsiveness, and better performance in lightly-threaded games and legacy software. The higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz supports this advantage.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT wins in two specific areas. The 25.6% lead in find prime numbers suggests an advantage in certain number-theoretic computations and cryptography-related workloads. The 19.7% lead in physics indicates stronger performance in physics simulation engines that use specific instruction patterns.

For platform flexibility, the Intel chip wins with DDR4 and DDR5 support, PCIe Gen 5, and ECC memory. These features matter for workstation builds, server-adjacent workloads, and future-proofing. The AMD chip wins on socket longevity with AM4, which supports a wide range of existing motherboards.

The AMD chip also offers an unlocked multiplier, which allows manual overclocking. This can partially close the performance gap in some workloads, though the database does not include overclocked benchmark results. The Intel chip has no such capability.

In summary, the Intel Core 5 211E is the superior processor for raw performance across nearly all benchmark categories. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT is the better choice only for the specific math workloads where it shows an advantage, or for builders who prioritize the lower launch MSRP and overclocking capability.