AMD Ryzen 5 40 vs Intel Core 5 211E Comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 40 and Intel Core 5 211E occupy opposite corners of the processor market. The Ryzen 5 40 is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile chip built for efficiency, while the Core 5 211E is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop part aimed at sustained throughput. The benchmark data shows a complete sweep: the Intel chip wins all 15 recorded head-to-head tests. The magnitude of those wins, however, varies dramatically by workload, which makes the comparison more nuanced than a simple scoreboard.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 40 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E records an average benchmark score of 37829. The AMD Ryzen 5 40 records an average benchmark score of 15882.

Q: How do the two processors compare in single-thread performance?

A: In the PassMark single-thread test, the Intel Core 5 211E scores 4006, which is 38.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 40's score of 2477.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 5 40 has 4 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 40 supports LPDDR5 memory. The Intel Core 5 211E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 5 40 has a boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 40 uses the Zen 2 architecture under the Mendocino codename, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It has a die size of 100 mm². The Intel Core 5 211E uses the Bartlett Lake codename, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 257 mm².

Cache layouts diverge significantly. The AMD chip allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, with 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip allocates 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, with a much larger 20 MB shared L3 cache. The larger L3 pool gives the Intel part a substantial advantage in workloads that repeatedly access the same data set.

Memory support also differs. The AMD Ryzen 5 40 uses LPDDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and records 88.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Intel Core 5 211E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but records 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Intel part supports ECC memory, while the AMD part does not.

PCIe connectivity shows a generational gap. The AMD chip provides PCIe Gen 3 with 4 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD part carries a Radeon 610M, while the Intel part carries UHD Graphics 730.

Power characteristics place them in different segments. The AMD Ryzen 5 40 has a TDP of 15 watts and targets the mobile market. The Intel Core 5 211E has a TDP of 65 watts and targets the desktop market. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FT6, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 5 211E wins every test in the database, but the margins tell the real story. The closest result is in the PassMark physics test, where the Intel chip scores 702 against the AMD chip's 432, a 38.5% lead. The single-thread tests show similar gaps: PassMark single-thread has Intel at 4006 versus AMD at 2477, a 38.2% advantage. Cinebench R15 single-core shows Intel at 289 versus AMD at 165.5, a 42.7% lead.

Multi-core workloads amplify the gap substantially. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core 5 211E scores 20389, while the AMD Ryzen 5 40 scores 4841. That is a 76.3% deficit for the AMD part. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows Intel at 2055 against AMD at 790, a 61.6% gap. The PassMark multithread test records Intel at 23833 and AMD at 9341, a 60.8% difference.

The largest single delta appears in floating-point math. PassMark floating point math has the Intel chip at 66402, versus 15194 for the AMD chip, a 77.1% lead. Integer math shows a 64.1% gap, with Intel at 88117 and AMD at 31598. Extended instructions follow a similar pattern: Intel scores 21592, AMD scores 6437, a 70.2% difference.

Data-heavy workloads favor Intel broadly. PassMark data compression shows Intel at 346757 versus AMD at 141533, a 59.2% lead. Data encryption has Intel at 17938 versus AMD at 6646, a 63% gap. Random string sorting shows Intel at 34308 against AMD at 15124, a 55.9% difference. Prime number finding is the smallest absolute margin: Intel scores 43, AMD scores 20, a 53.5% lead.

The overall benchmark profile confirms the hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen 5 40 sits at the 70th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core 5 211E sits at the 86th percentile. The nearest rivals for the AMD part include the AMD EPYC 75F3 at a 0.1% delta and the Intel Core Ultra 5 134U at a -0.2% delta. The nearest rivals for the Intel part include the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at a 0.1% delta and the Intel Core i9-14901E at a -0.2% delta.

Specification Differences

The core counts differ massively: 4 cores for AMD versus 10 cores for Intel. Thread counts follow suit at 8 threads versus 16 threads. Base clocks are close, with AMD at 2.80 GHz and Intel at 2.70 GHz, but boost clocks separate them: 4.30 GHz for AMD, 4.90 GHz for Intel.

TDP marks the largest power divide. The AMD Ryzen 5 40 draws only 15 watts, while the Intel Core 5 211E draws 65 watts. Socket compatibility is entirely different: AMD Socket FT6 versus Intel Socket 1700. Process nodes differ, with AMD on 6 nm and Intel on 10 nm. Die sizes also differ at 100 mm² for AMD and 257 mm² for Intel.

Cache specifications diverge at every level. L1 cache is 64 KB per core for AMD and 80 KB per core for Intel. L2 cache is 512 KB per core for AMD and 2 MB per core for Intel. L3 cache is 4 MB shared for AMD and 20 MB shared for Intel. Memory support splits between LPDDR5 (AMD) and DDR4/DDR5 (Intel). Memory bandwidth favors AMD at 88.0 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for Intel. ECC support exists only on Intel.

PCIe capability differs by generation and lane count: Gen 3 with 4 lanes for AMD, Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics are Radeon 610M for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. Market segments are Mobile for AMD and Desktop for Intel. Release dates differ, with the AMD part released later in 2025 and the Intel part earlier in 2025. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221; the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 40 does not win any benchmark in the head-to-head comparison. Its recorded strengths are contextual rather than absolute. The 15-watt TDP makes it suitable for passively cooled or ultra-portable systems where power draw is the primary constraint. Its 88.0 GB/s memory bandwidth exceeds the Intel part's 76.8 GB/s, which could matter in memory-bandwidth-sensitive workloads if the core count did not intervene. The smaller 100 mm² die and 6 nm process suggest lower production cost per unit, though pricing data is not recorded for the AMD part.

The Intel Core 5 211E wins all 15 recorded benchmarks. Its largest advantages appear in floating-point math (77.1% lead), Cinebench R23 multi-core (76.3% lead), and extended instructions (70.2% lead). These results point toward workloads that scale with core count, including rendering, simulation, and data processing. The 20 MB L3 cache and 16 threads give it a structural advantage in parallel tasks. The PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes provides connectivity headroom for discrete GPUs or high-speed storage. The desktop form factor and 65-watt TDP allow sustained operation under load.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear separation by use case. The AMD Ryzen 5 40 belongs in mobile devices where the 15-watt TDP and compact footprint are priorities. Its 70th percentile ranking places it among capable mid-range mobile processors, but its 4 cores limit it to lighter workloads. For a thin laptop handling office tasks, web browsing, and media playback, the Ryzen 5 40 delivers adequate performance with minimal power draw.

The Intel Core 5 211E is the choice for desktop workloads that demand throughput. Its 86th percentile ranking and 37829 average benchmark score place it in a different performance class. The 10 cores and 16 threads handle multi-threaded applications with room to spare. The 65-watt TDP is acceptable for desktop cooling solutions. The PCIe Gen 5 support and ECC memory compatibility extend its utility to workstation-class builds.

For anyone comparing these two directly, the benchmark results are unambiguous. The Intel Core 5 211E outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 40 in every recorded test, with deficits ranging from 38.2% to 77.1% depending on the workload. The AMD part only makes sense when the mobile form factor and low power draw are non-negotiable. Otherwise, the Intel part's core count, cache size, and clock speeds produce a decisive performance advantage across the entire benchmark suite.