AMD Ryzen 5 3501U vs Intel Core i7-14700T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data shows a decisive performance advantage for the Intel Core i7-14700T across every measured workload. The AMD Ryzen 5 3501U does not win a single head-to-head comparison, with the Intel part taking all 11 tests in the database. The largest margins appear in extended instructions, where the Intel processor scores 20052 against 3274, a delta of -83.7% for the AMD chip. Floating point math shows a similar gap: 79042 versus 12707, a -83.9% difference. Prime number finding is the most lopsided test, with Intel at 145 and AMD at 21, a -85.5% delta.

The multithreaded PassMark score confirms the pattern. Intel achieves 30571, while AMD manages 7071, which is -76.9%. Integer math follows the same trajectory: 113854 against 26321, also -76.9%. Data compression shows Intel at 354216 versus AMD at 87380, a -75.3% gap. Random string sorting is somewhat closer in relative terms, with Intel at 38546 and AMD at 10414, a -73% delta. Data encryption yields 21277 for Intel and 5580 for AMD, a -73.8% difference. Physics testing records 1946 for Intel and 483 for AMD, a -75.2% margin.

Single-thread performance tells a less severe story, though Intel still leads clearly. The PassMark single-thread score is 3905 for Intel and 2136 for AMD, a -45.3% delta. This is the smallest relative gap in the entire head-to-head set, indicating that the AMD architecture is comparatively stronger in lightly threaded work than in heavily parallel workloads. Still, the absolute difference remains substantial.

The average benchmark score in the database reinforces the hierarchy. Intel sits at 41914, while AMD is at 14320. The Intel part also holds an 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs, compared to AMD's 69th percentile. In the nearest rival comparisons, AMD's closest competitors include the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 at 14336 (-0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C at 14277 (+0.3%), and the Intel Core 7 160UL at 14232 (+0.6%). Intel's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS at 41963 (-0.1%), the Intel Core i7-12850HX at 41779 (+0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 at 42055 (-0.3%). These neighboring scores indicate that both processors sit within a tight band relative to their direct competition, but the two bands themselves are far apart.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design points. The AMD Ryzen 5 3501U belongs to the 3000 series and uses the Picasso codename, built on the Zen+ generation. Its process node is 12 nm, fabricated by GlobalFoundries. The Intel Core i7-14700T is a Core 14th Gen part with the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and it uses a 10 nm process from Intel's own foundry. The node difference alone suggests a more modern manufacturing approach for Intel, though the database does not quantify the performance-per-watt implications directly.

Core and thread counts diverge sharply. AMD provides 4 cores and 4 threads, with no simultaneous multithreading. Intel provides 20 cores and 28 threads, which indicates a hybrid configuration with performance and efficiency cores. The base clock for AMD is 2.10 GHz, while Intel runs at 1.30 GHz. Boost clocks reverse the order: AMD reaches 3.70 GHz, while Intel tops out at 5.20 GHz. The higher Intel boost ceiling contributes to its single-thread advantage, while the core count drives the multithreaded gap.

Cache hierarchies are also very different. AMD uses 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3. Intel uses 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3. The Intel L3 cache is more than eight times larger in total, which helps with data-heavy workloads. The L2 per core is four times larger on Intel, 2 MB versus 512 KB.

Memory support differs as well. AMD supports DDR4 only, on a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also on a dual-channel bus, but the database does not record a bandwidth figure for Intel. ECC memory is not supported by AMD, while Intel lists ECC support as enabled. PCIe generation also separates the two: AMD uses Gen 3, while Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics differ by vendor and capability. AMD ships Radeon Vega 8, while Intel includes UHD Graphics 770. The database does not provide comparative graphics benchmarks, so the analysis here is limited to feature presence. The AMD part is mobile-class, using AMD Socket FP5, while Intel is desktop-class, using Intel Socket 1700. The Intel die size is 257 mm², while AMD is 210 mm². AMD lists 4,940 million transistors, while Intel does not report a transistor count. Power envelopes differ as well: AMD has a 15 W TDP, while Intel has a 35 W TDP.

The Verdict

The data points to two distinct usage scenarios. For workloads that demand high throughput, the Intel Core i7-14700T is the clear choice. It wins every benchmark in the head-to-head set, often by margins exceeding 70%. The multithreaded score of 30571 versus 7071 indicates a processor that can handle parallel compilation, rendering, or data processing tasks with far greater headroom. The extended instructions score of 20052 against 3274 suggests that workloads using modern SIMD or cryptographic instruction sets will finish dramatically faster on Intel.

For single-threaded tasks, Intel still leads, but the gap narrows. The -45.3% delta in single-thread performance means that everyday responsive tasks, such as web browsing or office productivity, will favor Intel but not by the same factor as heavily threaded workloads. The AMD Ryzen 5 3501U, with its 15 W TDP and mobile socket, is positioned for low-power portable systems. Its 4-core, 4-thread configuration is suited to light computing where battery life matters more than peak performance.

The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $384. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP in the database. The Intel processor also sits at the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while AMD sits at the 69th percentile. The nearest rival data confirms that both parts are competitive within their own performance tiers, but the tiers are far apart. No benchmark in the recorded data suggests that the AMD processor can close the gap with the Intel part in any measurable way.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has 20 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U has 4 cores.

Q: What is the single-thread score difference?

A: Intel scores 3905 in the PassMark single-thread test, while AMD scores 2136, a -45.3% delta for AMD.

Q: Does the AMD processor support ECC memory?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U does not support ECC memory. The Intel Core i7-14700T does support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does the Intel processor support?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U supports only DDR4.

Q: What is the multithread benchmark result?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T scores 30571 in the PassMark multithread test, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U scores 7071.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U has 4 MB of shared L3 cache.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14700T wins every recorded benchmark, so the "wins" section is a matter of degree rather than direction. The largest relative wins for Intel are in prime number finding (-85.5%), floating point math (-83.9%), and extended instructions (-83.7%). These tests indicate workloads that are either highly parallel or instruction-heavy, such as scientific computation, financial modeling, or cryptographic processing. The smallest Intel lead is in single-threaded performance (-45.3%), which means that the Intel advantage is least pronounced in light, latency-sensitive tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 5 3501U does not win any test, but its relative performance profile suggests a different role. The single-thread gap is the smallest, so the AMD part comes closest to Intel in basic responsiveness. Its 15 W TDP and mobile socket make it suitable for fanless or low-power designs where sustained multithreaded performance is not the primary goal. The 4 MB L3 cache and 4-core configuration are appropriate for embedded or entry-level mobile workloads.

The data also shows that the AMD part's nearest rivals are all in the 14200 to 14336 range, while Intel's nearest rivals are in the 41650 to 42055 range. This separation means that purchasing decisions within each tier will depend on factors outside the recorded benchmarks, such as platform features, memory support, or integrated graphics, since the performance deltas among close rivals are minimal.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen 5 3501U uses a 12 nm process from GlobalFoundries, while Intel uses a 10 nm process from Intel. AMD has 4 cores and 4 threads; Intel has 20 cores and 28 threads. Base clocks are 2.10 GHz for AMD and 1.30 GHz for Intel, while boost clocks are 3.70 GHz and 5.20 GHz respectively. TDP is 15 W for AMD and 35 W for Intel.

Cache configurations differ: AMD has 96 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 4 MB L3 shared. Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB L3 shared. Memory support is DDR4 only for AMD, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is recorded at 38.4 GB/s for AMD, with no figure for Intel. ECC support is absent on AMD and present on Intel. PCIe generation is Gen 3 for AMD and Gen 5 for Intel. Integrated graphics are Radeon Vega 8 on AMD and UHD Graphics 770 on Intel.

Sockets differ: AMD uses AMD Socket FP5, Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part is mobile-class, the Intel part is desktop-class. Die size is 210 mm² for AMD and 257 mm² for Intel. AMD reports 4,940 million transistors, while Intel does not report a count. The AMD part uses the Picasso codename from the Zen+ generation; Intel uses Raptor Lake-R from the Raptor Lake refresh. Launch dates also differ: AMD records a release date of 2026-05-31, while Intel records 2024-01-07. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $384, while AMD has none recorded. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.