AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE vs Intel Core i3-10100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the most head-to-head benchmark comparisons?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE wins 5 of the 6 head-to-head tests, with the Intel Core i3-10100 taking only a single victory in the Cinebench R15 single-core test.

Q: How large is the AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE's advantage in multi-core workloads?

A: In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD part scores 615 versus the Intel's 258, a 138.4% difference. The margin is nearly identical in Cinebench R20 and R23 multi-core tests, with deltas of 138.3% and 138.2% respectively.

Q: Is the Intel Core i3-10100 faster in any benchmark?

A: Yes, in Cinebench R15 single-core, the Intel scores 88 against the AMD's 86, a 2.3% advantage. However, in the newer Cinebench R20 and R23 single-core tests, the AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE leads by 138.2% and 138.1% respectively.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for these two CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE has an average benchmark score of 1766, while the Intel Core i3-10100 sits at 1742. Both processors occupy the 41st percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The AMD chip's closest rival is the Intel Core i7-4870HQ, which scores 1769, a 0.2% difference. The Intel Xeon E-2224 trails by 0.2%, and the Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 and Intel Core i5-5675C are within 0.4% in either direction.

Q: What about the Intel Core i3-10100's competitive position?

A: The Intel part is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 3 4300U, both scoring 1742 with a 0% delta. The Intel Core i5-6600 is 0.1% ahead, the Intel Core i3-1315UE is 0.2% behind, and the Intel Core i7-980X trails by 0.2%.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE uses the Zen architecture, codenamed Raven Ridge, built on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It integrates 4,950 million transistors on a 210 mm² die. The Intel Core i3-10100 uses the Comet Lake architecture, also on a 14 nm process but fabricated by Intel; the database records no transistor count or die size for this part.

Both chips have 4 cores and 8 threads, but the cache layouts differ notably. The AMD processor allocates 128 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor uses 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and a larger 6 MB shared L3. This difference in cache hierarchy suggests the Intel design prioritizes a tighter per-core cache footprint, while the AMD design spreads more cache across the core complex.

Memory support is DDR4 on both platforms with dual-channel buses, but the AMD part claims a higher memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s versus the Intel's 42.7 GB/s. Neither supports ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs: the AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE provides Gen 3 with 8 CPU lanes, while the Intel Core i3-10100 provides Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes, doubling the available direct expansion bandwidth.

Integrated graphics separate the two clearly. The AMD chip carries a Radeon RX Vega 11, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 630. The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, whereas the Intel part is locked. The AMD unit uses AMD Socket AM4, the Intel uses Intel Socket 1200. The production status for both is listed as active, with release dates of April 2018 for AMD and April 2020 for Intel.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data reveals a lopsided contest in most measured workloads. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE scores 615 against the Intel Core i3-10100's 258, a 138.4% advantage. This pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 multi-core, where AMD posts 2564 versus 1076, a 138.3% delta, and in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where AMD scores 6107 against 2564, a 138.2% difference.

Single-core results tell a more complex story. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Intel part narrowly edges ahead with 88 versus 86, a 2.3% margin. However, in Cinebench R20 single-core, the AMD chip scores 362 against the Intel's 152, a 138.2% swing. The Cinebench R23 single-core test shows the same direction: AMD at 862, Intel at 362, a 138.1% lead for AMD.

The database also records additional Intel-only benchmark results that place the i3-10100 in a broader context. In 3DMark tests, the Intel chip scores 3235 for 16 threads, 1361 for 2 threads, 2357 for 4 threads, 3193 for 8 threads, 3185 for max threads, and 705 for single thread. Geekbench results show 4495 multi-core and 1350 single-core for the Intel part. These figures are not mirrored in the AMD dataset, so direct comparisons for these tests are not possible from the recorded data.

The consistency of the Cinebench deltas across multiple versions is striking. The AMD advantage hovers around 138% in every multi-core test and in the newer single-core tests, suggesting a systemic performance characteristic rather than a workload-specific anomaly. The lone Intel win in Cinebench R15 single-core, by a 2.3% margin, stands as an outlier against the broader pattern.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE | Intel Core i3-10100 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Series | 2000 series | Core 10th Gen |

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 3.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.80 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1200 |

| Architecture | Zen | Comet Lake |

| Codename | Raven Ridge | Comet Lake |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | Intel |

| Transistors | 4,950 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 128 KB per core | 64 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB per core | 256 KB per core |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB shared | 6 MB shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 46.9 GB/s | 42.7 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 | UHD Graphics 630 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Release Date | April 2018 | April 2020 |

The base and boost clocks favor Intel by a wide margin: 3.60 GHz versus 3.20 GHz at base, and 4.30 GHz versus 3.80 GHz at boost. The Intel TDP of 65 W is nearly double the AMD's 35 W. Despite the clock and power advantages on Intel's side, the benchmark results show AMD winning the majority of comparisons, which points to architectural efficiency differences rather than raw clock speed as the deciding factor.

The Verdict

The benchmark data paints a clear picture. The AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE dominates the Cinebench suite, winning 5 of 6 head-to-head tests with margins consistently around 138%. The Intel Core i3-10100's sole victory, a 2.3% edge in Cinebench R15 single-core, is a narrow and isolated result. The average benchmark scores align with this: AMD at 1766, Intel at 1742. Both processors sit at the 41st percentile among all CPUs, placing them in the same overall performance tier despite the lopsided head-to-head results.

For users prioritizing multi-threaded workloads, the AMD part is the clear choice based on the recorded data. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 6107 versus 2564 for Intel represents more than double the output. Even in single-core tests where Intel's higher clocks might suggest an advantage, the newer Cinebench versions show AMD leading by 138% or more. The Intel chip's higher TDP of 65 W does not translate into better benchmark outcomes in these tests.

The Intel processor does offer a larger L3 cache at 6 MB versus 4 MB, more PCIe lanes at 16 versus 8, and a higher boost clock at 4.30 GHz versus 3.80 GHz. However, these specification advantages do not appear in the Cinebench results. The integrated graphics differ, with AMD's Radeon RX Vega 11 being a more substantial GPU solution than Intel's UHD Graphics 630, though the database records no direct graphics benchmarks for either processor.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE wins in every multi-core benchmark recorded and in the newer single-core tests. Its 138.4% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 138.3% in R20 multi-core, and 138.2% in R23 multi-core make it the stronger choice for rendering, compilation, and any workload that scales across threads. The 35 W TDP also indicates lower power draw, which could matter for compact systems. The unlocked multiplier adds flexibility for users who wish to overclock.

The Intel Core i3-10100 wins only in Cinebench R15 single-core, with a 2.3% advantage over the AMD part. Its higher base and boost clocks, larger L3 cache, and doubled PCIe lane count are the specifications where it leads. The 16 PCIe lanes could benefit users with multiple expansion cards or high-bandwidth storage devices. The Intel part also has a later release date, coming in April 2020 versus April 2018 for AMD.

For gaming-oriented builds without a discrete graphics card, the AMD's Radeon RX Vega 11 integrated graphics likely offers a stronger baseline than Intel's UHD Graphics 630, though the database does not include graphics benchmarks for either chip. For general productivity and multi-threaded tasks, the recorded data strongly favors AMD. For users who need maximum PCIe expansion or who specifically value the older single-core Cinebench result, the Intel part has its niche. The overall performance tier is identical at the 41st percentile, but the head-to-head results show a decisive AMD advantage in the tests that were measured.