AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE is a 35-watt desktop processor built on the Zen architecture, combining four cores with eight threads and a base clock of 3.20 GHz that boosts to 3.80 GHz. It is an active part of the 2000 series, using the Raven Ridge codename, and integrates Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics, a feature that defines its hybrid positioning in the low-power desktop market.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 2400GE delivers an average benchmark score of 1766, which places it at the 43rd percentile among all CPUs tracked in the database. This is a mid-pack standing, indicating that while the processor is not a performance leader, it sits squarely in a competitive tier defined by older desktop and mobile parts. In Cinebench R15, the processor scores 615 in multi-core and 86 in single-core. The R20 run shows 2564 multi-core and 362 single-core, while the R23 results are 6107 and 862, respectively.

Looking at the nearest rivals, the data reveals a remarkably tight cluster. The Intel Core i7-4870HQ and Intel Core i3-9300 both post an average score of 1768, meaning the Ryzen 5 2400GE trails them by a mere 0.1 percent. That is a statistically insignificant gap, effectively a tie in aggregate performance. The Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 scores 1758, and the Ryzen leads it by 0.4 percent. The Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3 is the only rival that edges out the Ryzen, with a score of 1777, a 0.6 percent advantage. These deltas are all within a range that falls below what most users would perceive in real-world tasks, suggesting that the 2400GE competes on equal footing with these older or lower-tier Intel parts despite its drastically lower power envelope.

The multi-core scores tell a more specific story. In Cinebench R23, the 6107 multi-core score is roughly 7 times the single-core score of 862, which is a typical scaling ratio for a four-core, eight-thread processor with a modest boost clock. The Cinebench R20 ratio is similar, with 2564 divided by 362 yielding about 7.1. This indicates that the processor scales well across all cores, with no sign of thermal or power throttling suppressing multi-threaded throughput, a common risk for 35-watt parts. In Cinebench R15, the ratio is 615 to 86, about 7.2, confirming consistent behavior across benchmark generations.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The single-thread performance of the Ryzen 5 2400GE is its weaker dimension. A Cinebench R23 single-core score of 862 is low by modern standards, reflecting the 3.80 GHz boost clock and the first-generation Zen architecture, which trailed Intel in instructions per clock. The 86-point result in Cinebench R15 single-core reinforces this, showing that the processor will feel adequate for lightweight tasks like web browsing or office documents, but it will not excel in applications that are heavily dependent on a single fast core. The data suggests that the processor’s single-thread performance is more comparable to older mobile parts than to contemporary desktop chips, which is expected given its low TDP and 2018 release date.

Multi-thread behavior is where the 2400GE compensates. The eight threads allow it to handle parallel workloads with reasonable competence, as evidenced by the 6107 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core. This is a strong result for a 35-watt processor, and it indicates that the chip can sustain full multi-core loads without significant performance degradation. The 4 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support at 46.9 GB/s bandwidth help feed all cores effectively. For users running video encoding, 3D rendering, or batch photo processing, the multi-threaded scores will be far more representative of the experience than the single-core numbers. The split between 86 single-core and 615 multi-core in R15 — a 7.2x ratio — shows that the processor is designed for throughput over latency, a trade-off that favors content creators on a strict power budget.

Platform and Compatibility

The Ryzen 5 2400GE uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which is a significant compatibility advantage. The processor supports dual-channel DDR4 memory, providing a memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, and it does not support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity is limited to Gen 3 with 8 lanes from the CPU, which is half the lane count of many desktop rivals but sufficient for a single discrete GPU or a pair of NVMe drives in most configurations. The integrated Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics is a standout feature, as it allows the processor to function as a complete system without a discrete graphics card, which is rare in this performance class.

The platform’s upgrade path is arguably its strongest attribute. Since the processor is built on the AM4 socket, users can potentially move to newer Ryzen generations without replacing the motherboard, depending on BIOS support. The multiplier is unlocked, so overclocking is permitted, though the 35-watt TDP and integrated graphics may limit headroom. The 14 nm process node from GlobalFoundries, with 4,950 million transistors on a 210 mm² die, is an older node, but it enables the low power draw that defines this chip. The production status is active, meaning the processor remains available, and the release date of April 2018 makes it a mature platform with established driver support and compatibility. For small form factor builds or always-on systems, the AM4 platform offers flexibility that proprietary low-power sockets often lack.

How It Compares

Against the Intel Core i7-4870HQ, the Ryzen 5 2400GE is effectively dead even, with a 0.1 percent deficit in average score. The i7-4870HQ is a mobile part from an older generation, so this comparison highlights how the 2400GE can match a high-end laptop CPU from several years prior while doing so at a lower power draw. The Ryzen’s integrated Vega graphics also give it a feature advantage over the i7, which would typically require a discrete GPU for gaming.

The Intel Core i3-9300 is a more modern rival, and again the 2400GE trails by only 0.1 percent. This is notable because the i3-9300 is a desktop processor with a higher TDP, yet the benchmark scores are virtually identical. The Ryzen offers more threads (8 vs. 4), which may give it an edge in multi-threaded applications, even if the i3’s single-core performance is superior. The data shows that the 2400GE trades blows with the i3-9300 in aggregate, making it a viable alternative for users who prioritize the integrated graphics.

The Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 is a server-class chip from the Haswell era, and the Ryzen leads it by 0.4 percent. This is a meaningful result for a low-power part, as the Xeon has a higher core count and more cache, yet the 2400GE’s newer architecture and higher clocks per watt allow it to edge ahead. The Xeon also lacks integrated graphics, so the Ryzen is a more complete package for a desktop system.

The Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3 is the only rival that beats the Ryzen, doing so by 0.6 percent. The E5-4610 v3 is a multi-socket server processor, so its presence in this comparison is a testament to the 2400GE’s balanced performance. The Ryzen’s deficit is negligible in real-world terms, and the E5-4610 v3 would require a completely different motherboard and cooling setup, making the comparison academic rather than practical.

Who Should Consider It

The Ryzen 5 2400GE is best suited for users who need a compact, energy-efficient system that can handle a mix of everyday tasks and light creative work. The multi-core scores, particularly the 6107 in Cinebench R23, make it a reasonable choice for hobbyist video editors or 3D modelers who do not require professional-grade rendering speeds. The eight threads will keep up with multi-tasking workloads, such as running a browser with dozens of tabs, streaming video, and compiling code simultaneously. The integrated Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics mean that a discrete GPU is unnecessary for basic display output, which is ideal for home theater PCs or office desktops where space and power are at a premium.

Gamers should temper their expectations. The single-core score of 862 in Cinebench R23 suggests that the processor may bottleneck in CPU-intensive titles, and the integrated graphics, while capable, are not designed for high-refresh-rate gaming. For esports titles at lower settings, the 2400GE could suffice, but the data does not support it as a gaming-focused chip. Office productivity is a clear fit, as the single-thread performance is more than adequate for spreadsheets, word processing, and email, while the multi-core headroom handles background tasks without stutter. For users looking to build a low-power server or a quiet home server, the 35-watt TDP and active production status make it a dependable, available choice. The AM4 socket also provides a future upgrade path, so a user can start with this chip and later move to a higher-core-count Ryzen without changing the motherboard. The 2400GE is not a performance champion, but the benchmark data shows it is a balanced, capable processor for a specific and practical niche.