AMD Ryzen 5 220 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100. The head-to-head comparison array is empty, and neither processor records any wins in direct testing scenarios. This absence of comparative data is notable, as it prevents any direct numerical comparison between the two mobile processors based on identical test conditions.

What the data does show is a complete benchmark profile for the AMD Ryzen 5 220, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The Ryzen 5 220 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15502 and a single-core score of 2188. In Geekbench, the AMD chip records 7974 multi-core and 2027 single-core. The Ryzen 5 220 also posts a PassMark multi-thread score of 18582 and a single-thread score of 3646.

The Ryzen 5 220 holds a 75th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score sits at 22289. The nearest rivals for the AMD part include the Intel Core i7-10700K with an average score of 22230, placing the Ryzen 5 220 ahead by 0.3 percent. The Ryzen 5 220 also leads the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X by 1.4 percent, with the 3600X scoring 21992. However, the Intel Core i5-13500H scores 22468, which puts it 0.8 percent ahead of the Ryzen 5 220, and the Intel Core i7-1270P leads by 0.9 percent with a score of 22502.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero, indicating that no benchmark data has been recorded for this processor. The database cannot confirm any performance claims for the Snapdragon part based on recorded measurements.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is substantial, starting with the manufacturing process. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 uses a 4 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 uses a 3 nm process node, also from TSMC. The smaller node gives the Qualcomm part a theoretical manufacturing advantage, though no benchmark data exists to confirm practical implications.

The core configurations differ significantly. The Ryzen 5 220 uses 6 cores with 12 threads, indicating simultaneous multithreading support. The Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has 12 cores but also 12 threads, meaning it operates without multithreading, each core handling a single thread. The AMD part runs Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, while the Snapdragon uses the Glymur codename under the Snapdragon X2 Elite generation.

Clock speeds show a clear distinction. The Ryzen 5 220 has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Snapdragon X2E-78-100 lists a base clock of 4.00 GHz and no boost clock data. The absence of a recorded boost clock for the Qualcomm part leaves a gap in the comparison.

Cache hierarchies follow different designs. The Ryzen 5 220 provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Snapdragon X2E-78-100 offers 288 KB of L1 cache per core and 16 MB of shared L2 cache, with no L3 cache listed. The Qualcomm design consolidates its L2 into a larger shared pool, while the AMD design uses per-core L2 and a shared L3.

Memory support also diverges. The Ryzen 5 220 supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Snapdragon X2E-78-100 uses LPDDR5X on a dual-channel bus with 152.4 GB/s bandwidth. The Qualcomm part has a higher memory bandwidth figure, though this reflects the different memory type rather than a direct performance comparison.

PCIe connectivity differs in both generation and lane count. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes, while the Qualcomm part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 12 CPU lanes. The newer PCIe generation on the Snapdragon offers higher per-lane bandwidth, but the AMD part provides more lanes.

The integrated graphics units are distinct: the Ryzen 5 220 uses the Radeon 740M, while the Snapdragon X2E-78-100 uses the Adreno X2-85. Die size varies considerably, with the AMD chip at 137 mm² and the Qualcomm chip at 220 mm². The transistor count is recorded at 20,900 million for the AMD part, while no transistor count exists for the Snapdragon.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has 12 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 220 has 6 cores. However, the AMD part supports 12 threads through multithreading, matching the Snapdragon's 12 threads from its 12 physical cores.

Q: Does the database contain any direct benchmark comparisons between these two processors?

A: No. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has no recorded benchmark scores. Only the AMD Ryzen 5 220 has benchmark data in the database.

Q: What is the performance ranking for the AMD Ryzen 5 220?

A: The Ryzen 5 220 ranks in the 75th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 22289, which places it 0.3 percent ahead of the Intel Core i7-10700K and 1.4 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X.

Q: What process nodes do these processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 220 uses a 4 nm process node, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 uses a 3 nm process node. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

Q: Which processor has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has a memory bandwidth of 152.4 GB/s using LPDDR5X memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 has 89.6 GB/s bandwidth using DDR5 memory.

Q: What socket types do the two processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 220 uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 uses Qualcomm BGA 2343.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 220 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 12 |

| Threads | 12 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | Not listed |

| TDP | 28 W | Not listed |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Qualcomm BGA 2343 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Not listed |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Glymur |

| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 4, Hawk Point) | Snapdragon X2 (Elite) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Transistors | 20,900 million | Not listed |

| Die Size | 137 mm² | 220 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 288 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 16 MB shared |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB shared | Not listed |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 152.4 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes | Gen 5, 12 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 740M | Adreno X2-85 |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2026-04-05 |

| Part Number | 100-000001611 | X2E78100 |

| Benchmarks Recorded | 19 scores | None |

| Percentile | 75th | 50th |

| Average Benchmark Score | 22289 | 0 |

The Verdict

The data presents an asymmetric picture. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 has a complete benchmark record showing solid performance in the 75th percentile, with its closest rival margins within roughly one percent. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has no recorded benchmarks, making any performance assessment impossible from the database.

The architecture differences suggest the Qualcomm part is designed for a different set of tradeoffs. The 3 nm process, higher base clock, larger die, and higher memory bandwidth point toward a processor built for specific workloads. The 12 cores without multithreading, the larger L1 cache per core, and the shared L2 design indicate a different scheduling and throughput model compared to the AMD part's 6 cores with multithreading and per-core L2.

For users seeking a processor with measured performance data, the Ryzen 5 220 offers a verified profile. Its Cinebench R23 scores of 15502 multi-core and 2188 single-core, along with Geekbench results of 7974 multi-core and 2027 single-core, provide concrete reference points. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 18582 and a single-thread score of 3646, with specific workload scores ranging from 212739 in data compression to 65 in prime number finding.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 remains an unknown quantity in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking with an average score of zero indicates that no measurement supports any performance claim. The hardware specifications are present, but without benchmarks, the processor's actual behavior cannot be assessed.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 220 wins in every category where data exists, because the Qualcomm part has no recorded benchmarks. The AMD chip demonstrates strength across multi-threaded workloads with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15502 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 18582. Single-thread performance shows a Cinebench R23 score of 2188 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3646. The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths: integer math at 57987, floating point math at 35500, extended instructions at 15512, and data encryption at 12493.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 wins in specifications but not in measured performance. Its higher base clock of 4.00 GHz, larger L1 cache of 288 KB per core, 16 MB of shared L2 cache, and 152.4 GB/s memory bandwidth are all architectural advantages on paper. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 12 lanes represents a newer standard than the AMD part's PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes. The 3 nm process node and larger 220 mm² die size indicate a physically different chip design.

The release timeline shows the Snapdragon launching later, with a 2026-04-05 date compared to the Ryzen 5 220's 2025-01-05 date. This later release does not translate into recorded performance data in the database. The Qualcomm part remains a specification sheet without verification, while the AMD part offers a full set of measurements that place it among established desktop and mobile processors in the database.