AMD Ryzen 5 220 vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 220

CORE STATE Hawk Point
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.2 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 213PTE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,562
2,192
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
220
309
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
6,510
9,135
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
918
1,289
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
15,502
21,751
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,188
3,070
geekbench_multicore
7,974
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
2,027
N/A
passmark_data_compression
212,739
261,083
passmark_data_encryption
12,493
14,413
passmark_extended_instructions
15,512
16,146
passmark_find_prime_numbers
65
157
passmark_floating_point_math
35,500
71,722
passmark_integer_math
57,987
93,109
passmark_multithread
18,582
25,590
passmark_physics
983
2,199
passmark_random_string_sorting
25,433
30,106
passmark_single_thread
3,646
3,718
passmark_singlethread
3,646
3,718

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 220 vs Intel Core 5 213PTE

The AMD Ryzen 5 220 and Intel Core 5 213PTE occupy different corners of the processor market, and the benchmark data reflects that split clearly. The AMD part is a mobile-focused processor built on a 4 nm process, while the Intel chip is a desktop processor on a 10 nm process. The recorded data shows a decisive overall advantage for the Intel Core 5 213PTE, which wins every single head-to-head benchmark in the database. However, the magnitude of those wins varies dramatically depending on the workload, which tells a more nuanced story about what each processor does well.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins all 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons, but the margin of victory is not uniform. The largest gaps appear in workloads that stress raw computational throughput. The biggest single win is in the passmark find prime numbers test, where the Intel chip scores 157 against the AMD chip's 65, a difference of 58.6 percent. This is a massive gap that suggests the Intel architecture handles this particular type of integer workload far more efficiently.

Floating point math shows a similar pattern. The Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 71,722 in passmark floating point math, while the AMD Ryzen 5 220 scores 35,500, a 50.5 percent deficit for the AMD part. Physics simulation follows suit, with the Intel chip scoring 2,199 against the AMD chip's 983, a 55.3 percent gap. These are clear computational wins for Intel, indicating that the Core 5 213PTE is the stronger choice for number-crunching tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 5 220 does not win any benchmark outright, but it comes closest in single-threaded performance. In passmark single thread, the AMD chip scores 3,646 against the Intel chip's 3,718, a narrow 1.9 percent gap. This is the only head-to-head test where the two processors are nearly equal, and it shows that the AMD part is competitive when a workload relies on a single core. The extended instructions test also shows a relatively small gap, with Intel leading by only 3.9 percent (16,146 versus 15,512). These two results indicate that the AMD Ryzen 5 220 is not far behind in lightly threaded or instruction-heavy tasks.

The data suggests a clear split in use cases. The Intel Core 5 213PTE is the dominant choice for multi-threaded, math-heavy, and physics-based workloads, which are common in rendering, scientific computing, and gaming physics. The AMD Ryzen 5 220, while behind, is closest in single-threaded and extended instruction workloads, which are more typical of everyday desktop tasks and certain productivity applications.

The Verdict

The benchmark results point to a straightforward conclusion for most users. The Intel Core 5 213PTE is the stronger processor in nearly every measurable way. The database shows it delivers 28.7 percent higher multi-core scores in Cinebench R23 (21,751 versus 15,502) and similarly large leads across all other multi-threaded tests. For anyone building a desktop system for demanding workloads, the data clearly favors the Intel chip.

The AMD Ryzen 5 220 is a mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE is a desktop processor with a 45 W TDP. This difference in power envelope and market segment is reflected in the scores. The AMD part is likely intended for thin-and-light laptops where battery life and heat matter more than raw performance. The benchmark data shows it is a capable single-threaded performer, but it cannot match the Intel chip in sustained multi-core workloads.

The data indicates that the Intel Core 5 213PTE sits at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the AMD Ryzen 5 220 sits at the 75th percentile. The Intel chip's average benchmark score is 32,924, compared to the AMD chip's 22,289. The Intel processor's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12700 (within 0.1 percent) and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (within 0.5 percent), placing it in high-performance desktop territory. The AMD processor's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i7-10700K (within 0.3 percent) and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X (within 1.4 percent), are older or lower-end parts.

For a desktop user who needs maximum performance, the Intel Core 5 213PTE is the clear pick based on the recorded data. For a mobile user who prioritizes efficiency, the AMD Ryzen 5 220 offers a more power-conscious option, though the data shows it will be significantly slower in demanding tasks.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite provides the most comprehensive view of overall processor performance, and here the Intel Core 5 213PTE leads by a consistent margin. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Intel chip scores 2,192 versus the AMD chip's 1,562, a 28.7 percent gap. The single-core test shows a nearly identical 28.8 percent gap (309 versus 220). Cinebench R20 repeats the pattern with a 28.7 percent multi-core lead (9,135 versus 6,510) and a 28.8 percent single-core lead (1,289 versus 918). Cinebench R23 confirms the trend with a 28.7 percent multi-core advantage (21,751 versus 15,502) and a 28.7 percent single-core advantage (3,070 versus 2,188).

The consistency of these Cinebench gaps is notable. Every version of the test, from R15 to R23, shows the Intel chip holding roughly a 28.7 to 28.8 percent lead in both single-core and multi-core modes. This suggests a fundamental architectural advantage for the Intel Core 5 213PTE that scales across generations of the benchmark.

The Passmark suite reveals where the Intel chip's advantages are largest and smallest. The smallest gap is in single-thread performance, where Intel leads by just 1.9 percent (3,718 versus 3,646). This is the closest result in the entire head-to-head set. The extended instructions test is the second closest, with Intel ahead by 3.9 percent (16,146 versus 15,512). These two results show that the AMD Ryzen 5 220 can hold its own in certain light workloads.

The largest gaps are in find prime numbers (58.6 percent, Intel ahead), physics (55.3 percent), and floating point math (50.5 percent). Integer math also shows a significant 37.7 percent gap in favor of Intel (93,109 versus 57,987). Data compression and encryption show more moderate gaps of 18.5 percent and 13.3 percent respectively, while random string sorting shows a 15.5 percent difference. The multi-thread test shows a 27.4 percent gap (25,590 versus 18,582). All of these results consistently favor the Intel Core 5 213PTE.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has an average benchmark score of 32,924, while the AMD Ryzen 5 220 has an average score of 22,289.

Q: How large is the performance gap in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 21,751, which is 28.7 percent higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 220's score of 15,502.

Q: Is there any benchmark where the AMD Ryzen 5 220 is close to the Intel Core 5 213PTE?

A: Yes, the passmark single thread test shows the AMD chip scoring 3,646 against the Intel chip's 3,718, a narrow 1.9 percent gap, which is the closest result in the head-to-head data.

Q: What are the memory support differences between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 220 supports DDR5 memory, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 220 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How do the two processors compare in the passmark physics test?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 2,199, which is 55.3 percent higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 220's score of 983.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and process nodes. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It has 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The database does not list transistor count or die size for the Intel chip.

The cache hierarchies differ significantly. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger cache sizes on the Intel chip likely contribute to its performance advantage in memory-intensive workloads.

The integrated graphics also differ. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 includes Radeon 740M graphics, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE includes UHD Graphics 730. The database does not provide benchmark scores for these iGPUs, so a direct comparison is not possible.

The market segments are distinct. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 is a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. This reflects different design goals, with the mobile part prioritizing power efficiency and the desktop part prioritizing performance.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The base clock speeds are 3.20 GHz for the AMD chip and 2.10 GHz for the Intel chip, but the boost clocks are 4.90 GHz and 5.20 GHz respectively. The Intel chip has a higher boost clock, which helps explain its single-thread performance advantage.

The thermal design power differs substantially. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 has a TDP of 28, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has a TDP of 45. This reflects the mobile versus desktop design split.

Memory support differs. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bandwidth also differs, with the AMD chip rated at 89.6 GB/s and the Intel chip at 76.8 GB/s. Interestingly, the AMD chip has higher rated memory bandwidth despite lower overall performance, which may be relevant for certain memory-bound workloads.

ECC memory support is another differentiator. The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 5 220 does not. PCIe support also differs, with the AMD chip offering Gen 4 with 14 lanes and the Intel chip offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The Intel chip's newer PCIe generation and more lanes could be advantageous for expansion and storage.

The release dates are also different. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 was released on January 5, 2025, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE was released on March 8, 2026. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $221. The AMD chip has no recorded launch MSRP in the database. Both processors are currently active in production and have locked multipliers.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 220
5 213PTE
Core Specs
Cores
6
8 +33.3%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.2
2.1 -34.4%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.9
5.2 +6.1%
Frequency (GHz)
3.2
2.1 -34.4%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.9
5.2 +6.1%
Multiplier
32
21 -34.4%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
45 +60.7%
PL1
—
45 W
PL2
—
219 W
Configurable TDP
15-30 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
—
Codename
Hawk Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
20,900 million
—
Die Size
137 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
—
E-Core Frequency
3 GHz up to 3.5 GHz
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 740M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$221
Part Number
100-000001611
SA4QM
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen 5 220 Details View Core 5 213PTE Details