AMD Ryzen 5 1500X vs AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 1500X vs AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded benchmark results show a split decision between these two AMD processors, with each taking two wins in the Cinebench suite. The most dramatic difference appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B scores 6957 against the AMD Ryzen 5 1500X's 4597, a 51.3% advantage. This is a substantial gap, indicating that the embedded part has a significant edge in heavily threaded workloads under the R23 test methodology.
The AMD Ryzen 5 1500X strikes back in the older Cinebench R15 tests. In multi-core, it scores 805 versus 701 for the V1807B, a 12.9% lead. The single-core R15 result is even more lopsided: the 1500X scores 154 while the V1807B manages only 98, a 36.4% deficit for the embedded chip. That single-core R15 gap is the largest margin in either direction across the entire comparison.
Cinebench R23 single-core tells a different story, however. The V1807B edges ahead with 982 points versus 947 for the 1500X, a slim 3.7% margin. This suggests that the embedded processor's newer test performance is not simply a matter of core count or clock speed, but rather how the workload scales across different Cinebench versions.
Looking at average benchmark scores, the two are nearly inseparable. The V1807B posts an average of 2012, while the 1500X averages 1992. The nearest rivals in the database reinforce this closeness: the V1807B sits within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 7 1700, and the 1500X is exactly matched with the Intel Core i7-7920HQ at 0% delta. Neither processor dominates its peer group by a wide margin, but the V1807B holds a slight overall edge in aggregate performance.
The benchmark wins are evenly split at two each, but the magnitude of those wins is not symmetrical. The V1807B's 51.3% multi-core R23 victory dwarfs the 1500X's 36.4% single-core R15 win, while the other two results are relatively close. This asymmetry matters for real-world usage: the R23 multi-core result often correlates better with modern rendering and compilation workloads.
Architecture Differences
Both processors are built on AMD's Zen architecture and use the same 14 nm process node from GlobalFoundries. The V1807B belongs to the Ryzen Embedded line, specifically the Great Horned Owl generation, while the 1500X is part of the Summit Ridge desktop generation. Despite sharing the core microarchitecture, the packaging and platform targets differ considerably.
The V1807B uses AMD Socket FP5, a BGA-style embedded socket, whereas the 1500X uses the standard AMD Socket AM4. This fundamental difference affects upgradeability and system design. The embedded part is soldered to the board, while the AM4 socket allows for processor swaps. The V1807B also integrates Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics, giving it a complete system-on-chip solution, while the 1500X has no integrated graphics at all.
Cache configurations diverge significantly. The V1807B has 128 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and only 2 MB of shared L3 cache. The 1500X has a smaller 96 KB L1 per core but the same 512 KB L2 per core, and a much larger 16 MB shared L3 cache. This eightfold difference in L3 capacity could influence performance in cache-sensitive workloads, though the benchmark results show the V1807B still manages to win in R23 tests.
Transistor counts and die sizes are similar but not identical. The V1807B packs 4,950 million transistors on a 210 mm² die, while the 1500X has 4,800 million transistors on a slightly larger 213 mm² die. The embedded part achieves higher transistor density on a marginally smaller die. Both support DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration, but the 1500X lists a specific memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, while the V1807B does not have a recorded bandwidth figure.
ECC memory support is another differentiator. The 1500X supports ECC memory, while the V1807B does not. The 1500X also has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, whereas the V1807B's multiplier is locked. PCIe capabilities are only listed for the 1500X, which provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B is the clear choice for workloads that scale with Cinebench R23 multi-core performance. The 51.3% advantage over the 1500X in that test suggests strong parallel execution capabilities, likely beneficial for rendering, video encoding, or scientific computing tasks that use modern multithreaded libraries. Its integrated Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics also make it suitable for compact systems that need display output without a discrete GPU, such as embedded controllers or thin clients.
The AMD Ryzen 5 1500X wins where single-threaded performance under the R15 benchmark matters most. Its 36.4% lead in that test points to better legacy single-core optimization, which could translate to snappier response in older software or lightly threaded applications. The larger 16 MB L3 cache may also benefit workloads with frequent data reuse, even if the R23 results do not reflect this advantage. The 1500X's ECC memory support and unlocked multiplier make it more attractive for overclocking enthusiasts or users who require error-correcting memory in their builds.
For mixed workloads, the average benchmark scores suggest near parity, with the V1807B at 2012 and the 1500X at 1992. The percentile rankings are equally close: the V1807B sits at the 45th percentile of all CPUs, while the 1500X is at the 44th. This indicates that for general-purpose computing, neither processor has a decisive edge.
The R23 single-core result favors the V1807B slightly, meaning that modern single-threaded applications may run marginally better on the embedded chip. However, the 3.7% margin is small enough to be within run-to-run variance on many systems.
Specification Differences
| Specification | AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B | AMD Ryzen 5 1500X |
|---------------|---------------------------|-------------------|
| Base Clock | 3.35 GHz | 3.50 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 3.80 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |
| Socket | AMD Socket FP5 | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Generation | Ryzen Embedded (Zen, Great Horned Owl) | Ryzen 5 (Zen, Summit Ridge) |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Transistors | 4,950 million | 4,800 million |
| Die Size | 210 mm² | 213 mm² |
| ECC Memory | No | Yes |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 | None |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |
| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 42.7 GB/s |
| PCIe | Not listed | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |
| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $189 |
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B boosts to 3.80 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1500X boosts to 3.70 GHz. The V1807B has a 100 MHz advantage in boost frequency.
Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?
A: Only the AMD Ryzen 5 1500X supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B does not list ECC as a supported feature.
Q: Which chip has integrated graphics?
A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B includes Radeon RX Vega 11 integrated graphics. The AMD Ryzen 5 1500X has no integrated graphics and requires a discrete GPU.
Q: What is the difference in Cinebench R23 multi-core scores?
A: The V1807B scores 6957, which is 51.3% higher than the 1500X's 4597. This is the largest performance gap in the comparison.
Q: Are these processors unlocked for overclocking?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 1500X has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B has a locked multiplier.
Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?
A: The V1807B averages 2012, while the 1500X averages 1992. The V1807B is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 1700, and the 1500X is exactly tied with the Intel Core i7-7920HQ.
The Verdict
Choose the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B if you need a low-power, integrated solution. Its 45 W TDP is substantially lower than the 1500X's 65 W, making it better suited for compact or thermally constrained systems. The built-in Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics eliminate the need for a separate GPU, and the 51.3% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core shows strong modern multithreaded performance. The 3.7% single-core R23 advantage also favors it for contemporary single-threaded tasks.
Choose the AMD Ryzen 5 1500X if you prioritize legacy single-core performance, ECC memory support, or overclocking flexibility. Its 36.4% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core is substantial, and the unlocked multiplier allows for manual tuning. The 12.9% R15 multi-core advantage also indicates better performance in older multithreaded applications. The 1500X's larger 16 MB L3 cache may benefit certain workloads, and its AM4 socket provides upgrade options.
For most general-purpose use, the data shows near parity: the V1807B's average score of 2012 versus the 1500X's 1992 is a negligible difference, and both sit at similar percentile rankings. The decision ultimately comes down to platform requirements. If you need an embedded form factor with graphics and low power, the V1807B is the obvious pick. If you want a traditional desktop CPU with ECC, overclocking, and a larger cache, the 1500X fits that role better. The R23 multi-core results suggest the V1807B is the stronger choice for future-proofed multithreaded workloads, while the R15 results indicate the 1500X remains competitive for older software.