AMD Ryzen 5 150 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 Comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 150 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head comparison results between the AMD Ryzen 5 150 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither processor has recorded wins against the other in direct testing. This absence of comparative data means that any performance assessment must rely on the individual benchmark scores available for the AMD Ryzen 5 150, alongside the architectural specifications recorded for both parts.

The AMD Ryzen 5 150 has a complete set of PassMark benchmark results, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The Ryzen 5 150 achieves an average benchmark score of 34,881, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs tracked. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Xeon 6349P with an average score of 34,890 (a delta of 0 percent), the Intel Core 7 253PTE at 34,962 (0.2 percent higher), the Intel Core i7-13800H at 34,988 (0.3 percent higher), and the Intel Core i9-12900HX at 35,003 (0.3 percent higher). These figures indicate that the Ryzen 5 150 sits within a tight cluster of mid-range to high-end mobile processors, with performance differentials of less than half a percent against its closest competitors.

The Snapdragon X2E-78-100, by contrast, holds a 50th percentile position among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of zero due to the absence of recorded test data. This lack of scores makes it impossible to quantify its performance relative to the Ryzen 5 150 through measured benchmarks. The data indicates that the Snapdragon has no nearest rivals listed, further confirming that no comparative analysis can be derived from recorded results. The Ryzen 5 150's multithread score of 17,492, single-thread score of 3,155, and integer math score of 62,151 provide concrete reference points, but without corresponding Snapdragon numbers, no direct wins or losses can be established.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 150 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 150 has 11 recorded PassMark benchmark results, including a multithread score of 17,492, a single-thread score of 3,155, and a floating point math score of 35,118.

Q: Does the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs, which reflects the absence of test data rather than measured performance.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 150 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Ryzen 5 150's average score of 34,881 is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon 6349P at 34,890, and it trails the Intel Core 7 253PTE by 0.2 percent, the Intel Core i7-13800H by 0.3 percent, and the Intel Core i9-12900HX by 0.3 percent.

Q: What are the core counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 150 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What process nodes do the two processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 150 is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 uses a 3 nm process, also at TSMC.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 150 supports dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 supports dual-channel LPDDR5X with a memory bandwidth of 152.4 GB/s.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 150 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R, part of the Ryzen 5 generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 210 mm². The processor features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.55 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated graphics are Radeon 660M, and the processor uses the AMD Socket FP7. It supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes for CPU-only connectivity. The TDP is rated at 35 watts, and the part number is 100-000000990 (FP7r2).

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 uses the Glymur codename, part of the Snapdragon X2 (Elite) generation. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 220 mm². The processor has 12 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and no recorded boost clock. Its cache configuration includes 288 KB of L1 cache per core and 16 MB of shared L2 cache, with no L3 cache listed. The integrated graphics are Adreno X2-85, and the processor uses the Qualcomm BGA 2343 socket. It supports LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with 152.4 GB/s bandwidth, and PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes for CPU-only connectivity. No TDP value is recorded for this part, and its part number is X2E78100.

The most significant architectural differences are the core counts, with the Snapdragon offering twice the core count of the Ryzen, and the process node, where the Snapdragon uses a smaller 3 nm node compared to the Ryzen's 6 nm node. The cache designs also diverge substantially: the Ryzen uses a per-core L1 and L2 with a shared L3, while the Snapdragon uses a per-core L1 with a shared L2 and no L3. The memory bandwidth on the Snapdragon is roughly double that of the Ryzen, and the PCIe generation differs, with the Snapdragon supporting Gen 5 while the Ryzen supports Gen 4. Both processors are marked as active production, use TSMC as the foundry, and do not support ECC memory or unlocked multipliers.

The Verdict

Based on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 5 150 has a substantial body of benchmark results, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has none. The Ryzen 5 150's average benchmark score of 34,881 places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, with performance within 0.3 percent of several Intel mobile and server processors. The Snapdragon's 50th percentile ranking and average score of zero indicate that no performance conclusions can be drawn from measurements. For any user relying on benchmark-verified performance, the Ryzen 5 150 is the only option with recorded data supporting its capability. The Snapdragon's specifications, including 12 cores, a 4.00 GHz base clock, and 152.4 GB/s memory bandwidth, suggest potential, but the database contains no evidence of its execution in tested workloads.

The choice between these two processors, strictly from the data, favors the AMD Ryzen 5 150 for anyone requiring verified performance metrics. The Snapdragon X2E-78-100 cannot be evaluated for performance because no benchmark scores exist for it. The architectural differences, such as the Snapdragon's higher core count and newer process node, are recorded facts, but without benchmark confirmation, they do not translate into demonstrated advantages. The Ryzen 5 150's position among its nearest rivals, all within 0.3 percent of its average score, shows that it delivers competitive performance in its recorded segment.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across multiple specification fields. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads. The Ryzen has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.55 GHz, whereas the Snapdragon has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and no recorded boost clock. The Ryzen's TDP is 35 watts, while the Snapdragon has no TDP recorded. The Ryzen uses AMD Socket FP7, and the Snapdragon uses Qualcomm BGA 2343. The Ryzen's architecture is Zen 3+ with the codename Rembrandt-R, while the Snapdragon has no architecture listed but uses the codename Glymur. The process node is 6 nm for the Ryzen and 3 nm for the Snapdragon, both at TSMC. The die size is 210 mm² for the Ryzen and 220 mm² for the Snapdragon.

The cache configurations differ: the Ryzen has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3, while the Snapdragon has 288 KB L1 per core and 16 MB shared L2 with no L3. Memory support is DDR5 for the Ryzen and LPDDR5X for the Snapdragon, both dual-channel, with bandwidths of 76.8 GB/s and 152.4 GB/s respectively. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 20 lanes for the Ryzen and Gen 5 with 12 lanes for the Snapdragon. Integrated graphics are Radeon 660M for the Ryzen and Adreno X2-85 for the Snapdragon. Both are mobile market segments, active production, with no launch MSRP recorded, no ECC support, and no unlocked multiplier. The release dates differ, with the Ryzen dated September 30, 2025, and the Snapdragon dated April 5, 2026.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 150 wins in every category where recorded data exists. Its benchmark suite covers 11 distinct PassMark tests, including data compression at 211,289, data encryption at 13,425, extended instructions at 14,675, prime number finding at 47, floating point math at 35,118, integer math at 62,151, multithread performance at 17,492, physics at 806, random string sorting at 22,382, and single-thread performance at 3,155. These scores provide a full picture of its capabilities across integer, floating point, encryption, and sorting workloads. Its 84th percentile ranking confirms that it outperforms the majority of tracked CPUs in aggregate. The Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has no benchmark wins because it has no benchmark results. Its 50th percentile ranking is a neutral placeholder, not evidence of performance.

In terms of specifications that could translate to future wins, the Snapdragon holds advantages in core count (12 versus 6), base clock (4.00 GHz versus 3.30 GHz), process node (3 nm versus 6 nm), memory bandwidth (152.4 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s), and PCIe generation (Gen 5 versus Gen 4). These are architectural facts recorded in the database, but they have not been validated by any measured benchmark. The Ryzen 5 150 wins on verified performance data, TDP specification (35 watts recorded versus none for the Snapdragon), and the presence of a boost clock (4.55 GHz versus none recorded). For workloads requiring confirmed throughput, the Ryzen is the only choice with evidence. For workloads that might favor higher core counts or memory bandwidth, the Snapdragon presents theoretical advantages, but the database offers no proof of their realization.