AMD Ryzen 5 150 vs Intel Core 5 211E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data shows a clear overall advantage for the Intel Core 5 211E, which wins 9 of the 11 head-to-head comparisons. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 secures only 2 wins, both in specific computational tasks where its architecture appears better suited.

The largest margin of victory for Intel comes in floating-point math, where the Core 5 211E scores 66402 against the Ryzen 5 150's 35118, a 47.1% difference. This is a substantial gap and indicates the Intel part handles heavy mathematical workloads with considerably more efficiency. Data compression follows a similar pattern: Intel scores 346757 versus AMD's 211289, a 39.1% deficit for the Ryzen part. Random string sorting also favors Intel by 34.8%, with scores of 34308 and 22382 respectively.

Extended instruction performance shows Intel ahead by 32%, scoring 21592 compared to 14675. Integer math results in a 29.5% Intel advantage (88117 versus 62151). Data encryption favors Intel by 25.2%, with scores of 17938 and 13425. The multithread benchmark delivers a 26.6% Intel lead, 23833 versus 17492. Single-thread performance, often critical for everyday responsiveness, shows Intel at 4006 against AMD's 3155, a 21.2% gap.

The AMD Ryzen 5 150's two wins are notable despite the overall trend. In the find prime numbers test, AMD scores 47 versus Intel's 43, a 9.3% advantage. The physics benchmark shows AMD at 806 against Intel's 702, a 14.8% lead. These wins suggest the AMD architecture has specific strengths in certain integer-heavy or simulation-type workloads, even if the broader benchmark suite favors Intel.

The average benchmark score reinforces this picture. Intel's average is 37829, while AMD's is 34881. The percentile rankings also differ: Intel sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while AMD is at the 84th. The nearest rivals in the database for each part confirm their positioning; Intel's closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 with a delta of 0.1%, while AMD's nearest rival is the Intel Xeon 6349P with negligible difference.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and process technologies. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 211E uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The die sizes reflect this difference: AMD's die measures 210 mm², while Intel's is larger at 257 mm².

Core and thread counts differ substantially. AMD provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while Intel offers 10 cores and 16 threads. This explains much of the multithread performance gap. The cache hierarchies also diverge. AMD uses 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Intel uses 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. Intel's larger per-core L2 cache is particularly significant for workloads that benefit from fast local data access.

Memory support shows a clear split. AMD supports only DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus with identical peak bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory support is exclusive to the Intel part, which has it enabled, while the AMD does not support ECC.

PCIe connectivity also differs. AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, whereas Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Intel's newer PCIe generation offers higher per-lane bandwidth, though AMD provides more total lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well: AMD includes a Radeon 660M, while Intel includes UHD Graphics 730.

The market segments are different. AMD is classified as a mobile processor using the AMD Socket FP7, while Intel is a desktop processor using Intel Socket 1700. This explains the thermal design point difference: AMD's TDP is 35 watts, while Intel's is 65 watts. The release dates also differ, with AMD launching on 2025-09-30 and Intel on 2025-01-12.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 211E dominates most computational categories. Data compression, encryption, extended instructions, floating-point math, integer math, multithreaded workloads, random string sorting, and single-threaded performance all favor Intel. The margins range from 21.2% to 47.1%, making Intel the clear choice for general-purpose computing, content creation, and any workload that scales across multiple cores. The 10-core configuration with 16 threads provides a structural advantage in parallel tasks, and the higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz versus 4.55 GHz contributes to the single-thread lead.

The AMD Ryzen 5 150 wins in two specific areas: prime number finding and physics simulations. The prime number test shows a 9.3% advantage, and the physics benchmark shows a 14.8% lead. These results indicate that AMD's Zen 3+ architecture handles certain types of integer operations and physics calculations more efficiently per clock. The lower TDP of 35 watts also suggests the AMD part may be more suitable for thermally constrained environments, though the database does not include power efficiency benchmarks.

For users prioritizing raw throughput across a broad range of tasks, the data clearly points to Intel. For specialized workloads involving prime number generation or physics computations, AMD holds a measurable edge. The mobile versus desktop segmentation further clarifies use cases: AMD's mobile designation pairs with a 35-watt TDP for portable systems, while Intel's desktop designation with 65 watts suits stationary builds.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. AMD offers 6 cores and 12 threads, while Intel offers 10 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 3.30 GHz for AMD and 2.70 GHz for Intel, but boost clocks favor Intel at 4.90 GHz versus 4.55 GHz. Thermal design points are 35 watts for AMD and 65 watts for Intel.

The process node differs: AMD uses 6 nm from TSMC, Intel uses 10 nm from its own foundry. Die sizes are 210 mm² for AMD and 257 mm² for Intel. Cache configurations vary across all levels: L1 is 64 KB per core for AMD and 80 KB per core for Intel; L2 is 512 KB per core for AMD and 2 MB per core for Intel; L3 is 16 MB shared for AMD and 20 MB shared for Intel.

Memory support shows AMD restricted to DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. ECC memory is supported only on Intel. PCIe generation and lanes differ: Gen 4 with 20 lanes for AMD, Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics are Radeon 660M for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. Sockets are AMD Socket FP7 versus Intel Socket 1700. Market segments are Mobile for AMD and Desktop for Intel. Release dates are 2025-09-30 for AMD and 2025-01-12 for Intel. The launch MSRP for Intel is $221; AMD has no recorded launch MSRP. Both processors have locked multipliers and are currently active in production.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the single-thread performance difference?

A: Intel scores 4006 in the passmark single-thread test, which is 21.2% ahead of AMD's 3155.

Q: Does the AMD processor support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory support is false for the AMD Ryzen 5 150. The Intel Core 5 211E supports ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 150 supports only DDR5. The Intel Core 5 211E supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, compared to 4.55 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 150.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has an average benchmark score of 37829, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 has an average of 34881.

Q: Which processor wins the physics benchmark?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 150 wins the passmark physics test with a score of 806, which is 14.8% higher than Intel's 702.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates the Intel Core 5 211E is the stronger overall performer. Its 9 wins out of 11 head-to-head tests, higher average score of 37829 versus 34881, and 86th percentile ranking versus 84th all point to Intel as the more capable processor for general workloads. The multithread advantage of 26.6% and single-thread advantage of 21.2% make it suitable for both parallel tasks and responsive single-threaded applications. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration with 20 MB of L3 cache provides a structural foundation for these results.

The AMD Ryzen 5 150 appeals to a narrower set of use cases. Its wins in prime number finding and physics benchmarks demonstrate specific strengths, but the overall margin is insufficient to counter Intel's broad lead. The 35-watt TDP and mobile market segment suggest it targets portable or low-power systems, where thermal constraints matter more than peak performance. Its 6 nm process from TSMC offers a smaller die at 210 mm², which may benefit power efficiency, though the database does not include direct power measurements.

The choice depends on workload priority. Intel is the default recommendation for users seeking maximum throughput across compression, encryption, math, and multithreaded tasks. AMD is the pick for specialized physics or prime-number workloads, or for systems where the 35-watt TDP and mobile form factor are required. The Intel launch MSRP of $221 provides a reference point, but the database does not contain pricing for AMD. For most users, the Intel Core 5 211E delivers more consistent and higher performance across the recorded benchmark suite.